Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Assess the Impacts of Marine Renewable Energy

  • Jean-Philippe PezyEmail author
  • Aurore Raoux
  • Nathalie Niquil
  • Jean-Claude Dauvin


Since the beginning of the 2000’, the French government ambition was to have an offshore wind production formed 40% of the renewable electricity in 2030. Three calls tenders of Offshore Wind Farms (OWFs) construction have been pronounced since 2011. However, no offshore wind farm (OWF) had been constructed at the end of 2017 due to long administrative procedures and numerous appeals in justice, at French and European levels. Nevertheless, several studies have been enterprised to identify the environmental conditions and ecosystem functioning in selected sites before OWF implantations. However, these studies are generally focused on the conservation of some species or groups of species, and there is no holistic study on the effects of the construction and operation of OWF on an ecosystem taken as a whole. In 2017, a complete and integrated view of the ecosystem of two future OWF sites of the eastern English Channel (Courseulles-sur-Mer and Dieppe-Le Tréport) was developed to model the marine ecosystems before OWF implementation and to simulate reef effects due to new spatial occupation of maritime territory. Results contribute to a better knowledge of the impacts of the OWFs on the functioning of marine ecosystems. They also allow to define recommendations for environmental managers and industry in terms of monitoring the effects of marine renewable energy (MRE), not only locally but also on other sites, at national and European levels.


Offshore wind farm Ecosystemic approach Ecopath with EcoSim Ecological network analysis Monitoring Benthos Demersal fish Suprabenthos 



These works were co-funded by the Normandy Region, the group ‘Eoliennes Offshore du Calvados’ and the group ‘Eoliennes en mer Dieppe-Le Tréport’. We also acknowledge, for their help in the data sampling, the captain and the crew of the Oceanographic Vessel ‘Celtic Warrior’. We acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their comments on this article.


  1. 1.
    Bergström, L., Sundqvist, F., Bergström, U.: Effects of an offshore wind farm on temporal and spatial patterns in the demersal fish community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 485, 199–210 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Willsteed, E.-D., Jude, S., Gill, A., Birchenough, S.N.R.: Obligations and aspirations: a critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 82, 2332–2345 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey, H., Brookes, K.L., Thompson, M.: Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Aquat. Biosyst. 10, 1–13 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petersen, J.K., Malm, T.: Offshore windmill farms: threats to or possibilities for the marine environment. Ambio. 35, 75–80 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Mesel, I., Kerckhof, F., Norro, A., Rumes, B., Degraer, S.: Succession and seasonal dynamics of the epifauna community on offshore wind farm foundations and their role as stepping stones for non-indigenous species. Hydrobiologia. 756, 37–50 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilhelmsson, D., Malm, T.: Fouling assemblages on offshore wind power plants and adjacent substrata. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 79, 459–466 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raoux, A., Tecchio, S., Pezy, J.-P., Degraer, S., Wilhelmsson, D., Cachera, M., Ernande, B., Lassalle, G., Leguen, C., Grangeré, K., Le loch, F., Dauvin, J.-C., Niquil, N.: Benthic and fish aggregation inside an offshore wind farm: which effects on the trophic web functioning? Ecol. Indic. 72, 33–46 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raoux, A.: Approche écosystémique des Energies Marines Renouvelables: étude de l’impact sur le réseau trophique de la construction du parc éolien au large de Courseulles-sur-Mer et du cumul d’impacts. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Caen Normandie, France, 293 pp (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pezy, J-P.: Approche écosystémique d’un futur parc éolien en Manche orientale: exemple du site de Dieppe – Le Tréport. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Caen Normandie, France, 324 pp (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D’Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M.D., Steneck, R., Watson, R.: A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science. 319, 948–952 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Halpern, B.S., McLeod, K.L., Rosenberg, A.A., Crowder, L.B.: Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning. Ocean Coast. Manag. 51, 203–211 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dauvin, J.-C.: Are the eastern and western basins of the English Channel two separate ecosystems? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 64, 463–471 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Degraer, S., Brabant, R., Rumes, B., Vigin, L.: Environmental Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms in the Belgium Part of the North Sea: A Continued Move Towards Integration and Quantification. Royal Belgium Institute of Ntural Sciences, OD Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management Section., 141 pp, Brussels (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polovina, J.-J.: Model of a coral reef ecosystem. The ECOPATH model and its application to French Frigate Shoals. Coral Reefs. 3, 1–11 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen, V., Walters, C.J.: Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model. 172, 109–139 (2004). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christensen, V., Walters, C.J., Pauly, D., Forrest, R.: Ecopath with Ecosim version 6 User Guide. Lensfest Ocean Futur. Proj. 2008, 1–235 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plagànyi, E.E.: Models for an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, vol. 477. FAO, Rome. 108 pp (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ulanowicz, R.E.: Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. SpringerVerlag, New York. 166 pp (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dauvin, J.C., Lorgeré, J.C.: Modifications du traîneau MACER-GIROQ pour l’amélioration de l’échantillonnage quantitatif étagé de la faune suprabenthique. J. Rech. Océanogr. 14, 65–67 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, CNRSNormandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUENCaenFrance
  2. 2.Unité Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques (BOREA), MNHN, CNRS, IRDSorbonne Université, Université de Caen Normandie, Université des AntillesCaenFrance

Personalised recommendations