Advertisement

Justification in Protest Publics: The Homeless Workers’ Movement in Brazil’s Crisis

  • Victor Albert
Chapter
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)

Abstract

In the late 2000s, a number of analysts were optimistic about Brazil’s future. Their expectant analyses did not bear out, however, as a political and economic crisis developed just as Brazil was gearing up to host two mega-events, the World Cup in 2014 and the Olympic Games in 2016. This paper has two aims. The first is to deepen our understanding of the crisis through examining one of the foremost social actors to emerge in this period: the Landless Workers’ Movement (Movimento de Trabalhadores Sem-Teto, MTST). The second is to use this case to consider the potential for the sociology of critical capacity—a field of theory that emerged out of the Political and Moral Sociology Research Group in Paris in the 1980s—to contribute to theorising the ‘justification work’ of movements and protest publics.

Keywords

Crisis in Brazil Pragmatic sociology Protest publics Homeless Workers’ Movement 

References

  1. Abreu, M. d. A. (2014). A apropriação do território no Brasil colonial [The appropriation of territory in colonial Brazil]. In F. Fridman & R. Haesbaert (Eds.), Escritos sobre Espaço e História (pp. 265–298). Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (1996). Collective action, culture and civil society: Secularizing, updating, inverting, revising and displacing the classical model of social movements. In J. Clark & M. Diani (Eds.), Alain Touraine (pp. 205–234). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  3. Arretche, M. (Ed.). (2015). Trajetórias das Desigualdades: como Brasil mudou nos últimos 50 anos [Trajectories of inequality: How Brazil changed over the past 50 years]. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
  4. Blokker, P. (2011). Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blokker, P. (2014). Luc Boltanski and democratic theory: Fragility, auto-nomos, and critique as democracy’s end. Thesis Eleven, 124(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blokker, P., & Brighenti, A. (2011). Politics between justification and defiance. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Boltanski, L. (2013). A journey through French-style critique. In P. du Gay & G. Morgan (Eds.), New spirits of capitalism?: Crises, justifications, and dynamics (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boulos, G. (2014). Por que ocupamos? Uma introdução à luta dos sem-teto [Why we occupy? An introduction to the homeless struggle]. São Paulo: Scortecci.Google Scholar
  13. Boulos, G. (2015). De que lado você está?: reflexões sobre a conjuntura política e urbana no Brasil [What side are you on? Reflections on the political and urban conjuncture in Brazil]. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  14. Bruff, I., Ebenau, M., & May, C. (Eds.). (2015). New directions in comparative capitalisms research: Critical and global perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Chiapello, E. (2013). Capitalism and its criticisms. In P. du Gay & G. Morgan (Eds.), New spirits of capitalism?: Crises, justifications, and dynamics (pp. 61–81). Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
  16. Clément, K. (2015). Unlikely mobilisations: How ordinary Russian people become involved in collective action. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 2(3–4), 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dias, E. C. (2015). Profits and votes: Entrepreneurs and the government in Brazilian housing policy. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 35(4), 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eakin, M. (2013). The emergence of Brazil on the world stage. Latin American Research Review, 48(3), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fernandes, A. C., & Novy, A. (2010). Reflections on the unique response of Brazil to the financial crisis and its urban impact. Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 952–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green, S. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirata, F. (2009). “Minha Casa, Minha Vida”: Política habitacional e de geração de emprego ou aprofundamento da segregação urbana? [“My House My Life”: Housing policy and employment generation or deepening urban segregation?]. Revista Aurora, 2(2), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. Hirata, F., & Oliveira, N. C. (2012). Os movimentos dos sem-teto de São Paulo no contexto neoliberal [Homeless movements in São Paulo in the neoliberal context]. In A. Boito & A. Galvão (Eds.), Política e Classes Sociais no Brasil dos anos 2000 (pp. 369–402). São Paulo: Alameda Editorial.Google Scholar
  24. Holston, J. (1991). The misrule of law: Land and usurpation in Brazil. Comparative Studies of Society and History, 33(4), 695–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jagd, S. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography and creativity in social movements. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jasper, J. M. (2007). Cultural approaches to the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans & C. Roggeband (Eds.), Handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 59–109). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Klandermans, B. (2005). Politicised collective identity: Collective identity and political protest. Social Identification in Groups, 22, 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magnani, G. C. (2015). A Copa do Povo e o Vale do Lírio: duas experiências sob o olhar etnográfico “de perto e de dentro” [The cup of the people and the Lily valley: Two experiences with the ethnographic gaze “from up close and within”]. Áltera, 1(1), 112–143.Google Scholar
  31. Mahony, N., & Clarke, J. (2013). Public crises, public futures. Cultural Studies, 27(4), 933–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marques, E., & Rodrigues, L. (2015). A produção pública de habitação [The public production of housing]. In E. Marques (Ed.), A metrópole de São Paulo no século XXI: espaços, heterogeneidades e desigualdades (pp. 337–366). São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
  33. Nash, K. (2014). The promise of pragmatic sociology, human rights, and the state. In S. Sussen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’ (pp. 351–367). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  34. Neri, M. C. (2010). Os emergentes dos emergentes: reflexões globais e ações locais para a nova classe média brasileira [The emergents of the emergents: Global and local reflections on the new Brazilian middle class]. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
  35. Neri, M. C. (2011). A nova classe média: o lado brilhante da base da pirâmide [The new middle class: The shining side of the base of the pyramid]. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
  36. Neri, M. C., Carvalhães, L., & Monte, S. D. R. S. (Eds.). (2010). Superação da Pobreza e a Nova Classe Média no Campo [Overcoming poverty and the new middle class in rural regions]. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
  37. Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Pochmann, M. (2014). O mito da grande classe média: capitalismo e estrutura social [The myrth of the large middle class: Capitalism and social structure]. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  39. Ricoeur, P. (2000). The just. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rizek, C. S., Santo Amore, C., & de Camargo, C. M. (2014). Política social, gestão e negócio na produção das cidades: o programa Minha Casa Minha Vida “entidade” [Social policy, administration, and negotiation in the production of cities: The my house my life entities programme]. Cadernos CRH, 27(72), 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roett, R. (2011). The new Brazil. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  42. Rolnik, R. (2015). Guerra dos Lugares [War of places]. São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  43. Rosa, M. (2015). Beyond the MST: The impact on social movements. In M. Carter (Ed.), Challenging social inequality: The landless workers’ movement and agrarian reform in Brazil (pp. 375–389). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saad-Filho, A. (2013). Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, june–july 2013. Critical Sociolgy, 39(5), 657–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saad-Filho, A., & Boito, A. (2016). Brazil: The failure of the PT and the rise of the ‘new right’. Socialist Register, 52, 213–230.Google Scholar
  46. Secco, L. (2014). A hegemonia tardia [Late hegemony]. In M. Pinheiro (Ed.), Ditadura: o que resta da transição (pp. 231–246). São Paulo: Boitempo.Google Scholar
  47. Silber, I. F. (2003). Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology: Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tedesco, M. C. (2013). Grassroots activist video documentary in Brazil and the construction of new cultural identities: The case of the homeless workers movement. Social Identities, 19(3–4), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thévenot, L. (2002). Which road to follow? The moral complexity of an “equipped” humanity. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 53–87). Durham, NH: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thévenot, L. (2006). Institutions and agency: Differentiating regimes of engagement. Max Planck Summer Conference on Economy and Society. Italy: Lago di Como.Google Scholar
  51. Thévenot, L. (2011). Power and oppression from the perspectives of the sociology of engagements: A comparison with Bourdieu’s and Dewey’s critical approaches to practical activities. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thévenot, L. (2012). Enlarging conceptions of testing moments and critical theory: Economies of worth, on critique and sociology of engagements. In S. Sussen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’ (pp. 235–244). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  53. Thévenot, L. (2014). Voicing concern and difference: From public spaces to common-places. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thévenot, L., et al. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States (pp. 229–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Albert
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Policy Department, School of Political Science, Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations