Skip to main content

New Deterministic Model of Evolving Trinomial Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Complex Networks and Their Applications VII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 812))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We provide a new model of attributed networks where label of each vertex is a partition of integer n into at most m integer parts and all labels are different. The metric in the space of (nm)-partitions is introduced. First, we investigate special class of the trinomial \((m^2, m)\)-partitions as a base for synthesis of networks G(m). It turns out that algorithmic complexity (the shortest computer program that produces G(m) upon halting) of these networks grows with m as \(\log m\) only. Numerical simulations of simple graphs for trinomial \((m^2, m)\)-partition families \((m= 3, 4, \ldots , 9)\) allows to estimate topological parameters of the graphs—clustering coefficients, cliques distribution, vertex degree distribution—and to show existence of such effects as scale-free and self-similarity for evolving networks. Since the model under consideration is completely deterministic, these results put forward new mode of thought about mechanisms of similarity, preferential attachment and popularity of complex networks. In addition, we obtained some numerical results relating robust behavior of the networks to disturbances like deleting nodes or cliques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There exist optimal algorithm and recurrent rules for exact computation of number of partitions in the classes P(nm) [11].

  2. 2.

    There is totipotency cell in living organisms, i.e. a single cell with the ability to divide and produce all of the differentiated cells in an organism.

  3. 3.

    The closest analogy to low value for K-complexity is the problem of generating all partitions of n into at most m parts. An upper bound on K-complexity of the problem is \(\log n\) because the recurrence holds for all integers m and n but running time to generate all partitions grows exponentially with n [11].

  4. 4.

    Perfect graph is a graph in which the chromatic number of every induced subgraph equals the size of the largest clique of that subgraph [16].

  5. 5.

    J-distance \(d(A,B) = 1 - (A \cap B)/(A \cup B)\) is measure dissimilarity between two sets A and B (see [14]).

References

  1. Andrews, G.E.: Number Theory (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, G.E.: Euler’s “Exemplum memorabile inductionis fallacis" and q-trinomial coefficients. J. Am. Math. Soc. 3(3), 653–669 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1990932

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barabási, A.L., Ravasz, E., Vicsek, T.: Deterministic scale-free networks. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 299(3–4), 559–564 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00369-7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bocharov, P.: Partition Games Research Toolbox (2015). https://github.com/pbo/partition-games

  5. Bocharov, P., Goryashko, A.: Evolutionary dynamics of partition games. In: 2015 International Conference "Stability and Control Processes” in Memory of V.I. Zubov (SCP), pp. 225–228. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCP.2015.7342108. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7342108/

  6. Bollobás, B.: Random graphs. In: Modern Graph Theory, pp. 215–252. Springer, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bollobás, B., Riordan, O.M.: Mathematical results on scale-free random graphs. In: Handbook of Graphs and Networks (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602755.ch1

  8. Chaitin, G.J.: On the length of programs for computing finite Binary Sequences: statistical considerations. J. ACM 13(4), 547–569 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1145/321495.321506

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cvetkovic, D., Rowlinson, P., Simic, S., Beineke, W., Godsil, C., Royle, G., Biggs, N., Doob, M., Wilson, R.J.: Algebraic Graph Theory (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0163-9

  10. Goryashko, A.: On suboptimal solution of antagonistic matrix games. ITM Web of Conferences, vol. 1(03001) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171003001

  11. Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, Combinatorial Algorithms, Part 1, vol. 4A. Addison-Wesley Professional (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kolmogorov, A.N.: Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Probl. Inf. Trans. 1(1), 1–7 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leskovec, J., Chakrabarti, D., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C., Ghahramani, Z.: Kronecker graphs: an approach to modeling networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 985–1042 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levandowsky, M., Winter, D.: Distance between sets. Nature 234(5323), 34 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, M., Vitányi, P.M.B.: Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lovász, L.: Perfect graphs. Sel. Top. Graph Theory 2, 55–87 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morzy, M., Kajdanowicz, T., Kazienko, P.: On measuring the complexity of networks: kolmogorov complexity versus entropy. Complexity (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2), 167–256 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480

    Google Scholar 

  19. OEIS Foundation Inc.: The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (2018). https://oeis.org

  20. Samokhine, L.: Trinomial Family Research Toolbox (2017). https://github.com/samokhine/gory

  21. Tardos, E., Wexler, T.: Network Formation Games and the Potential Function Method (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1785414.1785439

  22. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zenil, H., Kiani, N.A., Tegnér, J.: Low-algorithmic-complexity entropy-deceiving graphs. Phys. Rev. E (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012308

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Goryashko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goryashko, A., Samokhine, L., Bocharov, P. (2019). New Deterministic Model of Evolving Trinomial Networks. In: Aiello, L., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 812. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics