Crop Rotation pp 163-192 | Cite as

Crop Rotation Could Alleviate Climate Change Damage

  • S. OudaEmail author
  • A. Zohry


The relationships between climate, crop, water, and soil are complex with many biological processes involved. Climate change is expected to have many adverse impacts agriculture, which is considered to be the most tangible affected sector. In this chapter, we used the knowledge we learned from the previous chapters to suggest intensive crop rotations to be implemented in 2030 under climate change. The suggested crop rotations were designed to tolerate the stressful effects of climate change, namely loss in the productivity of its crops, rise in its required irrigation water, and the degradation of the cultivated soils. Thus, it could maximize food production and diminish irrigation water losses, which will lead to maximize land and water productivities. The increase in the projected water requirements of the cultivated crops in these rotations were calculated in 2030 using RCP6.0 climate change scenario resulted from MIROC5 model. The results indicated that implementing the suggested rotations in 2030 could alleviate the harmful effect of crop rotations, where more food could be produced, some irrigation water can be saved and minimized soil degradation, as a result of increasing number of legume crop.


Intercropping systems Three-crop sequence Cultivation on raised beds Irrigation scheduling 


  1. Abd El-Galil AM, Abdel-Ghany REA (2014) Effect of groundnut-sesame intercropping and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components, and infection of root-rot and wilt diseases. Int J Plant and Soil Sci 3(6):623–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abd El-Zaher ShR, Gendy EK (2014) Effect of plant density and mineral and bio-nitrogen fertilization on intercropping faba bean with sugar beet. Egypt J Appl Sci 29(7):352–366Google Scholar
  3. Abd El-Zaher ShR, Shams AS, Mergheny MM (2013) Effect of intercropping pattern and nitrogen fertilization on intercropping wheat with tomato. Egypt J Appl Sci 28(9):474–489Google Scholar
  4. Abdel CG (2006) Improvement of tomato fruit-set under natural high temperature: I. Intercropping tomato with sunflower or corn. J Dohuk Univ 9(2):2–16Google Scholar
  5. Abouelenein R, Oweis T, Sherif M, Khalil FA, Abed El-Hafez SA, Karajeh F (2010) A new water saving and yield increase method for growing berseem on raised seed bed in Egypt. Egypt J Appl Sci 25(2A):26–41Google Scholar
  6. Abou-Elela AM (2012) Effect of intercropping system and sowing dates of wheat intercropping with sugar beet. J Plant Prod 3(12):3101–3116Google Scholar
  7. Abou-Keriasha MA, El-Habbak KE, Shams SAA (1993) Effect of inetrcropping soybean with sorghum varieties on yield and yield components of the intercrops. Egypt J Appl Sci 8(6):873–881Google Scholar
  8. Abou-Keriasha MA, Gadallah RA, Mohamdain EEA (2008) Response of groundnut to intercropping with some sesame varieties under different plant density. Arab Univ J Agric Sci 16(2):359–375Google Scholar
  9. Abou-Keriasha MA, Zohry AA, Farghly BS (1997) Effect of intercropping some field crops with sugar cane on yield and its components of plant cane and third ratoon. J Agric Sci 22(12):4163–4176Google Scholar
  10. Ahmed AM, Ahmed NR, Khalil SRA (2013) Effect of intercropping wheat on productivity and quality of some promising sugarcane cultivars. Minia J Agric Res Develop 33(4):557–583Google Scholar
  11. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy, p D05109Google Scholar
  12. Annandale JG, Stockle CO (1994) Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather. A sensitivity analysis. Irrig Sci 15:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Attaher S, Medany M, AbdelAziz AA, El-Gendi A (2006) Irrigation-water demands under current and future climate conditions in Egypt. In: The 14th Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Agricultural Engneering, pp 1051–1063Google Scholar
  14. Baker JT, Gitz DC, Payton P, Wanjura DF, Upchurch DR (2007) Using leaf gas exchange to quantify drought in cotton irrigated based on Canopy temperature measurements. Agron J 99:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bakheit BR, Abo-Elwafa A, Abdel-Galil MM, Abdelmonem AMA (2016) Impacts of recurrent selection and synthetic population on forage and seed yields of monocot Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.). Assiut. J Agric Sci 47(1):31–44Google Scholar
  16. de la Fuentea EB, Suárez SA, Lenardis AE, Poggio SL (2014) Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. J Life Sci 70(71):47–52Google Scholar
  17. Dwivedi A, Dev I, Kumar V, Yadav RS, Yadav M, Gupta D, Singh A (2015) Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under Smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. Tomar1 Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res 4(3)Google Scholar
  18. Eid H (2001) Climate change studies on Egyptian agriculture. Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI) ARC, Ministry of Agriculture, Giza, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  19. El-Gergawi ASS, Saif LM, Abou-Salama AM (2000) Evaluation of sunflower intercropping in spring planted sugarcane fields in Egypt. Assuit J Agric Sci 312:163–174Google Scholar
  20. El-Massah S, Omran G (2014) Would climate change affect the imports of cereals? The case of Egypt, Hand book of climate change adaptation, Berlin. Springer-Verlag Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  21. El-Nahrawy MA (2011) Country pasture/forage resource profiles, Egypt. FAO, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Vialedelle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy, p 27Google Scholar
  22. El-Yamani KM, Ibrahim ST, Osman EBA (2010) Intercropping sunflower with soybean in the New Valley. Egypt J Appl Sci 25(7):288–302Google Scholar
  23. Farghaly BS, Zohry AA, Bassal SAA (2003) Crops management for intercropping sugar beet with some essential crops to maximize area unit productivity. J Agric Sci 28(7):5183–5199Google Scholar
  24. Farghly BS (1997) Yield of sugar cane as affected by intercropping with faba bean. J Agric Sci 22(12):4177–4186Google Scholar
  25. Fernandez-Munoz R, Gonzalez-Fernandez JJ, Cuartero J (1995) Variability of pollen tolerance to low temperatures in tomato and related with species. J Hortic Sci 70:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fujino J, Nair R, Kainuma M, Masui T, Matsuoka Y (2006) Multi-gas mitigation analysis on stabilization scenarios using AIM global model. Multi-gas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J Spec 27:343–353Google Scholar
  27. Gardner FP, Pearce RB, Mitchell RL (1985) Physiology of crop plants. Iowa State University Press. Ames, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamd-Alla WA, Shalaby EM, Dawood RA, Zohry AA (2014) Effect of cowpea (Vigan sinensis L.) with maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping on yield and its components. Int Sch Sci Res Innov 8(11):1170–1176Google Scholar
  29. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Andersen MK, Jornsgaard B, Jensen ES (2006) Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crops Res 95:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hijioka Y, Matsuoka Y, Nishimoto H, Masui M, Kainuma M (2008) Global GHG emissions scenarios under GHG concentration stabilization targets. J Glob Environ Eng 13:97–108Google Scholar
  31. Ibrahim S, Shaaban M, Gendy EK (2010) Intercropping faba bean with tomato. Egypt J Appl Sci 25(6A):167–181Google Scholar
  32. Ijoyah MO, Fanen FT (2012) Effects of different cropping pattern on performance of maize-soybean mixture in Makurdi, Nigeria. Sci J Crop Sci 1(2):39–47Google Scholar
  33. IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report: climate change 2007. Synthesis Report, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  35. Jabbar A, Ahmad R, Bhatti IH, Aziz T, Nadeem M, Din WU, Rehman AU (2011) Residual soil fertility as influenced by diverse rice-based inter/relay cropping systems. Int J Agric Biol 13:477–483Google Scholar
  36. Kamel AS, Zohry AA, Ouda S (2016) Unconventional solution to increase crop production under water scarcity. In: Major crops and water scarcity in Egypt. Springer Publishing House, pp 99–114Google Scholar
  37. Kestha MM, El-Baz MG (2004) Studies on sunflower-tomato intercropping. In: Proceeding of the 16th international sunflower conference, Fargo, ND, USA, pp 514–518Google Scholar
  38. Khalil AA (2013) Effect of climate change on evapotranspiration in Egypt. Researcher 51:7–12Google Scholar
  39. Khalil FA, Farag H, El Afandi G, Ouda SA (2009) Vulnerability and adaptation of wheat to climate change in Middle Egypt. In: Proceeding of the 13th international conference on water technology, Egypt, 12–15 MarchGoogle Scholar
  40. Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M (2002) Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Adv Agron 77:293–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ko J, Piccinni G, Marek T, Howell T (2009) Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (Kc) of cotton and wheat. Agric Water Manag 96:1691–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Machado S (2009) Does intercropping have a role in modern agriculture? J Soil and Water Conserv 64(2):233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morsy M (2015) Use of regional climate and crop simulation models to predict wheat and maize productivity and their adaptation under climate change. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Science Al-Azhar UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Nair A (2015) Assessing nitrogen credits from clover cover crops and effects of seed inoculation. Iowa State Research Farm Progress Reports 1-1-2015Google Scholar
  45. Ouda S, Khalil F, Yousef H (2009) Using adaptation strategies to increase water use efficiency for maize under climate change conditions. In: 13th international conference on water technology, Hurghada, Egypt. 12–15 MarchGoogle Scholar
  46. Ouda S, Khalil F, Noreldin T (2013) Simulation of adaptation to climate change on wheat and maize in Egypt. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-659-44279-7Google Scholar
  47. Ouda S, Noreldin T (2017) Evapotranspiration data to determine agro-climatic zones in Egypt. J Water and Land Dev 32(I-III)79-86Google Scholar
  48. Ouda S, Zohry AA, Khalifa H (2016) Combating deterioration in salt-affected soil in Egypt by crop rotations. In: Management of climate induced drought and water scarcity in Egypt: unconventional solutions. Springer Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  49. Ouda S, Noreldin T, Abd El-Latif K (2015) Water requirements for wheat and maize under climate change in North Nile Delta. Span J Agric Res 13(1):1–7Google Scholar
  50. Ouda S, Noreldin T, Hosny M (2016) Evapotranspiration under changing climate. In: Major crops and water scarcity in Egypt. Springer Publishing House, pp 1–22. ISBN: 978-3-319-21770-3Google Scholar
  51. Pressman E, Bar-Tal A, Shaked R, Rosenfeld K (1997) The development of tomato root system in relation to the carbohydrate status of the whole plant. Ann Bot 80:533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rahman A, Karim NN, Kadir N, Naher T (2015) Impacts of climate change on crop coefficient and reference crop evapotranspiration of boro rice in north-east hydrological region of Bangladesh. In: 5th international conference on water and flood management, pp 345–350Google Scholar
  53. Rao KPC, Ndegwa WG, Kizito K, Oyoo A (2011) Climate variability and change: farmer perceptions and understanding of intra-seasonal variability in rainfall and associated risk in semi-arid Kenya. Exp Agric 47:267–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reddy KC, Arunajyothy S, Mallikarjuna P (2015) Crop coefficients of some selected crops of Andhra Pradesh. J Inst Eng (India): Ser A, 96, 123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shahidian S, Serralheiro R, Serrano J, Teixeira J, Haie N, Francisco S (2012) Hargreaves and other reduced-set methods for calculating evapotranspiration, evapotranspiration—remote sensing and modeling. In: Dr. Ayse Irmak (ed) ISBN: 978-953-307-808-3, InTech, Available from: Scholar
  56. Sherif SA, Gendy EK (2012) Growing maize intercropped with soybean on beds. Egypt J Appl Sci 27(9):409–423Google Scholar
  57. Sherif SA, Zohry AA, Ibrahim ST (2005) Effect of planting dates and densities of maize intercropped with groundnut on growth, yield and yield components of both crops. Arab Univ J Agric Sci 13(3):771–791Google Scholar
  58. Snyder RL, Orang M, Bali K, Eching S (2004) Basic irrigation scheduling BIS.
  59. Sundara B (2000) Sugarcane cultivation. Vikas Publishing House PvtLtd, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  60. Taha A (2012) Effect of climate change on maize and wheat grown under fertigation treatments in newly reclaimed soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Tanta University, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  61. Wayne GP (2013) The beginner’s guide to representative concentration pathways. Skeptical Science, Version 1.0.
  62. Wright JL (1982) New evapotranspiration crop coefficients. J Irrig Drainage Div ASCE 108:57–74Google Scholar
  63. Zohry A, Ouda S, Abdel-Wahab T (2018) Sustainable intensive cropping to reduce irrigation-induced erosion: I. Intercropping systems under surface irrigation practice. Rev Mar Sci Agron Vét. Accepted for PublicationGoogle Scholar
  64. Zohry AA (1997) Effect of intercropping onion with autumn planted sugar cane on cane yield and juice quality. Egypt J Agric Res 77(1):273–287Google Scholar
  65. Zohry AA (2005) Effect of relaying cotton on some crops under bio-mineral N fertilization rates on yield and yield components. Ann Agric Sci 431:89–103Google Scholar
  66. Zohry AA, Abbady K, El-Mazz E, Ahmed H (2018b) Maximizing land productivity by diversified cropping systems with different nitrogen types. Acta Agriculturae Slov 109(3):481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil, Water and Environment Research InstituteAgricultural Research CenterGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Field Crops Research InstituteAgricultural Research CenterGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations