Advertisement

Ethical Challenges for Animals from Traditional and Complementary Medicine

  • Kate ChatfieldEmail author
Chapter
  • 106 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

Humans use and abuse animals for many purposes, including the production and testing of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) products. While some animals may benefit from T&CM interventions, many more suffer harm. In both animal experimentation and for the production of T&CM products, animals can be exposed to stress, pain, artificially induced diseases and/or ultimately killed. However, the use of animals in T&CM products (for example, oil extracted from the blubber of the River Dolphin or the intestines of a porcupine) is more ethically challenging than the use of animals in T&CM research. First, research is better regulated. Second, animals used in research are often bred for purpose whereas most of the animals used for T&CM products are taken from the wild in an unregulated manner and many are endangered species such as rhinos, and tigers. Ethical challenges for the use of animals in T&CM products are analysed together with potential for adoption of the same ethical principles that govern animal experimentation (replacement, reduction, refinement).

Keywords

Traditional medicine Animals Animal welfare Animal ethics Three R’s Zootherapy 

References

  1. Abraham C (2014) Rhino horn is no medicine, New Sci 222 (2966): 27–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves RRN (2009) Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves RRN, Albuquerque UP (2013) Animals as a source of drugs: bioprospecting and biodiversity conservation. In: Animals in traditional folk medicine. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–89Google Scholar
  4. Alves RRN, Alves HN (2011) The faunal drugstore: animal-based remedies used in traditional medicines in Latin America. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7(1):9–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves RRN, Santana GG, Rosa IL (2013) The role of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. In: Animals in traditional folk Medicine. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–301Google Scholar
  6. Alves RRN, Silva JS, da Silva Chaves L, Albuquerque UP (2018) Ethnozoology: an overview and current perspectives. In: Ethnozoology. Elsevier, Massachusetts, pp 513–521Google Scholar
  7. Alves RRN, Souto WMS, Barboza RRD (2010) Primates in traditional folk medicine: a world overview. Mammal Rev 40(2):155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersson TE (2004) Hormones, horses and the menopause industry: the truth about Premarin. Conference paper: American Sociological Association, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  9. Association of British Veterinary Acupuncturists (2018) What conditions can it treat? http://www.abva.co.uk/pet-owner-area/what-conditions-can-it-treat/. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  10. Athiyaman A (2008) An exploration into modeling sustainable consumption: the case of animal-based tradtional medicines. Proc Acad Mark Stud 13(1):11Google Scholar
  11. Bear Conservation (2018) Bear farms. http://www.bearconservation.org.uk/bear-farms/. Accessed 04 May 2018
  12. Bentham J (1823) Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/bentham/government.htm. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  13. Bergenstrahle AE, Nielsen BD (2015) 29 Attitude and behavior of veterinarians surrounding the use of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine in the treatment of equine musculoskeletal pain. J Equine Vet Sci 35(5):395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borah MP, Prasad SB (2017) Ethnozoological study of animals based medicine used by traditional healers and indigenous inhabitants in the adjoining areas of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 13(1):39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. British Association of Veterinary Herbalists (2018) Common conditions that could be treated with herbal supplements. http://www.herbalvets.org.uk/2016/common-conditions-that-could-be-treated-with-herbal-supplements/. Accessed 21 Apr 2018
  16. Challem J (2007) “Bear bile” constituent may help patients who have retinal degeneration. Altern Complement Ther 13(2):113Google Scholar
  17. Costa-Neto EM (1999) Healing with animals in Feira de Santana City, Bahia, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol 65(3):225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences and the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science (2012) International guiding principles for biomedical research involving animals. http://iclas.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/CIOMS-ICLAS-Principles-Final.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2018
  19. Darwin C (1838) Notebook C, Transmutation of species. http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/vanWyhe_notebooks.html. Accessed 26 Jun 2017
  20. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man. http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=F937.1&viewtype=text. Accessed 13 Jan 2018
  21. Das D (2015) Ethnozoological practices among tribal inhabitants in Khowai district of Tripura, North-East India. J Global Biosci 4(9):3364–3372Google Scholar
  22. Department of Health (2013) Medicines/pharmaceuticals of animal origin. Australian Department of Health, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  23. Electronic Medicines Compendium (2018) Ursodeoxycholic acid. https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/7253/smpc. Accessed 07 May 2018
  24. European Commission (2018) Animals in scientific research. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/index_en.htm. Accessed 03 May 2018
  25. Euorpean Union (2012) Commission regulation (EU) No 722/2012. vol L 212Google Scholar
  26. Ferreira F, Fernandes-Ferreira H, Léo Neto N, Brito S, Alves R (2013) The trade of medicinal animals in Brazil: current status and perspectives. Biodivers Conserv 22(4):839–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferreira FS, Brito SV, de Oliveira Almeida W, Alves RRN (2015) Conservation of animals traded for medicinal purposes in Brazil: can products derived from plants or domestic animals replace products of wild animals?  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0767-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillén J, Vergara P (2018) Global guiding principles: a tool for harmonization. In: Laboratory animals, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Massachusetts, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  29. International Union for Conservation of Nature (2011) IUCN red list if threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ Accessed 14 Feb 2018
  30. Kikuchi R (2012) Captive bears in human-animal welfare conflict: a case study of bile extraction on Asia’s bear farms. J Agric Environ Ethics 25(1):55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim H, Song M-J (2013) Ethnozoological study of medicinal animals on Jeju Island, Korea. J Ethnopharmacol 146(1):75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luo J, Yan D, Zhang D, Feng X, Yan Y, Xiao X, Dong X (2011) Substitutes for endangered medicinal animal horns and shells exposed by antithrombotic and anticoagulation effects. J Ethnopharmacol 136(1):210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mepham B (1995) An ethical matrix for animal production. New Farmer Grow 46:14Google Scholar
  34. Nascimento AL, Lozano A, Melo JG, Alves RR, Albuquerque UP (2016) Functional aspects of the use of plants and animals in local medical systems and their implications for resilience. J Ethnopharmacol 194:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. North American Equine Ranching Information Council (2018) About the equine ranching industry. http://www.naeric.org/about.asp?strNav=4. Accessed 22 Mar 2018
  36. Omasa T, Onitsuka M, Kim W-D (2010) Cell engineering and cultivation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11(3):233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pavão MSG, Mourão PAS (2012) Challenges for heparin production: artificial synthesis or alternative natural sources? Glycobiology Insights 3:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2018) Premarin: a prescription for cruelty. http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animals-used-experimentation-factsheets/premarin-prescription-cruelty/. Accessed 22 Mar 2018
  39. Rangarajan M (2005) India’s wildlife history. Orient Blackswan, TelanganaGoogle Scholar
  40. Rastogi S, Kaphle K (2011) Sustainable traditional medicine: taking the inspirations from ancient veterinary science. Evid Based Complement Altern Med (eCAM) 8(1):1–6Google Scholar
  41. Regan T (1987) The case for animal rights. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russell WMS, Burch RL, Hume CW (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Sajem Betlu AL (2013) Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use among the Biate tribe of Dima Hasao District, Assam, Northeastern India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 9:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Save the Rhino (2018) Poaching for rhino horn. https://www.savetherhino.org/rhino_info/threats_to_rhino/poaching_for_rhino_horn. Accessed 15 Mar 2018
  45. Silver F (2012) Biomaterials, medical devices and tissue engineering: an integrated approach. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York Review, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer P (1993) Equality for animals? In practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–83Google Scholar
  48. Still J (2003) Use of animal products in traditional Chinese medicine: environmental impact and health hazards. Complement Ther Med 11(2):118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams VL, Whiting MJ (2016) A picture of health? Animal use and the Faraday traditional medicine market, South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol 179:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Wildlife Fund (2018) Rhino facts. https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/rhino. Accessed 15 Mar 2018
  51. Yeshi K, Morisco P, Wangchuk P (2017) Animal-derived natural products of Sowa Rigpa medicine: their pharmacopoeial description, current utilization and zoological identification. J Ethnopharmacol 207:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yibin F, Kayu S, Ning W, Kwan-Ming N, Sai-Wah T, Tadashi N, Yao T (2009) Bear bile: dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 5:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Professional EthicsUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations