Advertisement

Defining Traditional and Complementary Medicine

  • Kate ChatfieldEmail author
Chapter
  • 112 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

‘Complementary’, ‘alternative’, ‘traditional’ or even ‘pseudomedicine’, are just some of the words that are used to describe this body of therapeutic interventions. Collectively, these terms evoke an array of seemingly disparate connotations, indicative of a wide range of perspectives. Indeed, opinions about their worth span a full spectrum from: ‘essential and highly valued forms of health care’, to: ‘no better than placebos that are proffered by charlatans’. This polarisation of perspectives is a significant challenge when it comes to explanation of what is meant by ‘complementary’ or ‘traditional’ medicine, as is the broad range of individual interventions that fall under this sizeable umbrella. The challenges for establishing a clear definition are explained and arguments given for adopting the World Health Organization’s definition of ‘traditional and complementary medicine’ (T&CM). An overview of the controversial nature of the subject matter provides a backdrop to subsequent ethical analysis in later chapters.

Keywords

Complementary medicine Traditional medicine Alternative medicine Evidence-based medicine Definition Benefits Controversy 

References

  1. Abbott R (2014) Documenting traditional medical knowledge. World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/resources/pdf/medical_tk.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2018
  2. Abdullahi AA (2011) Trends and challenges of traditional medicine in Africa. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 8(5S):115–123Google Scholar
  3. Barrett B, Marchand L, Scheder J, Plane MB, Maberry R, Appelbaum D, Rakel D, Rabago D (2003) Themes of holism, empowerment, access, and legitimacy define complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in relation to conventional biomedicine. J Altern Complement Med 9(6):937–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell IR, Koithan M, Pincus D (2012) Methodological implications of nonlinear dynamical systems models for whole systems of complementary and alternative medicine. Complement Med Res 19(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellavite P (2003) Complexity science and homeopathy: a synthetic overview. Homeopathy 92(4):203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benitez-Bribiesca L (2000) Alternative medicine: to teach or not to teach. Arch Med Res 31(6):537–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith GT (2010) Why consumers maintain complementary and alternative medicine use: a qualitative study. J Altern Complement Med 16(2):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. British Medical Association (1993) Complementary medicine: new approaches to good practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspi O, Sechrest L, Pitluk HC, Marshall CL, Bell IR, Nichter M (2003) On the definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine: societal mega-stereotypes vs. the patients’ perspectives. Altern Ther Health Med 9(6):58–62Google Scholar
  10. Cassidy CM (2002) Commentary on terminology and therapeutic principles: challenges in classifying complementary and alternative medicine practices. J Altern Complement Med 8(6):893–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL (2015) Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. Natl Health Stat Rep 79:1Google Scholar
  12. Colquhoun D, Isbell B (2007) Credible endeavour or pseudoscience? Times Higher Education Supplement, 6 April , p 14Google Scholar
  13. Cronje R, Fullan A (2003) Evidence-based medicine: toward a new definition of ‘rational’ medicine. Health: Interdiscip J Soc Study Health, Illn Med 7(3):353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. di Sarsina PR, Alivia M, Guadagni P (2012) Widening the paradigm in medicine and health: person-centred medicine as the common ground of traditional, complementary, alternative and non-conventional medicine. In: Costigliola V (ed) Healthcare overview. Advances in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebell MH, Sokol R, Lee A, Simons C, Early J (2017) How good is the evidence to support primary care practice? Evid Based Med 22(3):88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernst E, Smith K (2018) More harm than good?: the moral maze of complementary and alternative medicine. Springer International Publishing, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eskinazi D (1998) Factors that shape alternative medicine. J Am Med Assoc 280(18):1621–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evidence Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 268(17):2420–2425Google Scholar
  19. Franzel B, Schwiegershausen M, Heusser P, Berger B (2013) Individualised medicine from the perspectives of patients using complementary therapies: a meta-ethnography approach. BMC Complement Altern Med 13(1):124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Müllner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD (2012) Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. Ochsner J 12(1):45–56Google Scholar
  21. Fulder S (1988) The handbook of complementary medicine, 2nd edn. Open University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Guyatt GH, Rennie D (2001) Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall H (2009) Homeopathy: still crazy after all these years. Skeptic 15(1):8–9Google Scholar
  24. Hannah L, Ross GJ, Oliver PT (2012) Pilot Study: The suitability of sham treatments for use as placebo controls in trials of spinal manipulative therapy: a pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ (2012) Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract 66(10):924–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes BM (2008) How should clinical psychologists approach complementary and alternative medicine? Empirical, epistemological, and ethical considerations. Clin Psychol Rev 28(4):657–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerridge IH, McPhee JR (2004) Ethical and legal issues at the interface of complementary and conventional medicine. Med J Aust 181:164–167Google Scholar
  28. Kim DI, Jeong JC, Kim KH, Rho JJ, Choi MS, Yoon SH, Choi S-M, Kang KW, Ahn HY, Lee MS (2011) Acupuncture for hot flushes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Acupunct Med 29(4):249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre M (2001) The House of Lords select Committee’s report on CAM. J Altern Complement Med 7(1):9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miettinen OS (2001) The modern scientific physician: 1. Can practice be science? Can Med Assoc J 165(4):441–442Google Scholar
  31. Milgrom LR (2006) Is homeopathy possible? J R Soc Promot Health 126(5):211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Health Service (2018) Complementary and alternative medicine. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/complementary-and-alternative-medicine/. Accessed 10 Apr 2018
  33. O’Connor BB (1995) Healing traditions: alternative medicine and the health professions. Studies in health, illness, and caregiving, vol xxiv. Univeristy of Pennsylvania Publishing, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Office of Alternative Medicine (1997) Defining and describing complementary and alternative medicine. In Panel on definition and description, CAM research methodology conference, April 1995. Altern Ther Health Med 3(2):49–57Google Scholar
  35. Oliver D (2014) Evidence based medicine needs to be more pragmatic. BMJ 349(7966):g4453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Omonzejele PF, Maduka C (2011) Metaphysical and value underpinnings of traditional medicine in West Africa. Chin J Integr Med 17(2):99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ostendorf GM (1991) Naturopathy and alternative medicine—definition of the concept and delineation. Das Offentliche Gesundheitswesen 53(2):84–87Google Scholar
  38. Park H-L, Lee H-S, Shin B-C, Liu J-P, Shang Q, Yamashita H, Lim B (2012) Traditional medicine in China, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 32, 546–555Google Scholar
  39. Patriani Justo CM, dé Andrea Gomes MH (2008) Conceptions of health, illness and treatment of patients who use homeopathy in Santos, Brazil. Homeopathy 97(1):22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reid R, Steel A, Wardle J, Trubody A, Adams J (2016) Complementary medicine use by the Australian population: a critical mixed studies systematic review of utilisation, perceptions and factors associated with use. BMC Complement Altern Med 16(1):176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Research America (2016) US investments in medical and health research and development. https://www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/2016US_Invest_R&D_report.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
  42. Sharma U (1992) Complementary medicine today. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaw D (2010) Homeopathy is where the harm is: five unethical effects of funding unscientific ‘remedies’. J Med Ethics 36(3):130–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaw D (2011) Homeopathy and medical ethics. Focus Altern Complement Ther 16(1):17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh S, Ernst E (2008) Trick or treatment?: alternative medicine on trial. Bantam, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith K, Ernst E, Colquhoun D, Sampson W (2016) Complementary & alternative medicine (CAM): ethical and policy issues. Bioethics 30(2):60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stambolovic V (1996) Medical heresy—the view of a heretic. Soc Sci Med 43(5):601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stein H (1990) American medicine as culture. Westview Press, Boulder COGoogle Scholar
  49. Tataryn DJ (2002) Paradigms of health and disease: a framework for classifying and understanding complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med 8(6):877–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teixeira MZ (2009) Homeopathy: a preventive approach to medicine? Homeopatía: una praxis médica preventiva? 8(29):155–172Google Scholar
  51. Tyreman S (2011) Values in complementary and alternative medicine. Med Health Care Philos 14(2):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. White P (2000) What can general practice learn from complementary medicine? Br J Gen Pract 50(459):821–823Google Scholar
  53. Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Berman BM (2011) Development and classification of an operational definition of complementary and alternative medicine for the Cochrane collaboration. Altern Ther Health Med 17(2):50–59Google Scholar
  54. Witt C, Schützler L (2012) The gap between results from sham-controlled trials and trials using other controls in acupuncture research—the influence of context. Complement Ther Med.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2012.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wittgenstein L (1967) Philosophische Untersuchungen. Philosophical investigations. Translated by GEM Anscombe. Wiley-Blackwell, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  56. World Health Organization (2000) General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. World Health Organization, Hong Kong SARGoogle Scholar
  57. World Health Organization (2013) WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014–2023. World Health Organization, Hong Kong SARGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Professional EthicsUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations