Skip to main content

Research Methods – What Is Best for Developing and Evaluating Human Computer Interaction and Interactive Artistic Installations?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Work Interaction Design. Designing Engaging Automation (HWID 2018)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 544))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 721 Accesses

Abstract

Research in human computer interaction (HCI) covers both technological and human behavioral concerns. As a consequence, the contributions made in HCI research tend to be aware to either engineering or the social sciences. In HCI the purpose of practical research contributions is to reveal unknown insights about human behavior and its relationship to technology. Practical research methods normally used in HCI include formal experiments, field experiments, field studies, interviews, focus groups, surveys, usability tests, case studies, diary studies, ethnography, contextual inquiry, experience sampling, and automated data collection. In this paper, we report on our experience using developing and evaluation methods to assess artifacts. Four defined outputs (projects) were examples of the different methods application to gather information about user’s wants, habits, practices, concerns and preferences. An interactive artistic installation, Sea Grains – an immersive poetics in interactive artistic experience, is another example of the use of research methods for development and evaluation of artifacts. The goal was to build an understanding of the attitudes and satisfaction of the people who might interact with those artifacts. Conversely, we intend to present a framework design to be applied on the design for interactive applications, to promote better user’s experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Höök K., Laaksolahti J., Isbister K.: In: Proceedings of the WP9 Workshop on Innovative Approaches for Evaluating Affective Systems (2006). The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things, Revised Edition. Basic Books, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laurel, B.: Design Research, MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mao, J.-Y., et al.: The state of user-centered design practice. Commun. ACM 48(3), 105–109 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Eklund, T., et al.: Usability evaluation of an XP product. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pp. 280–289 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schindlholzer, B.: Methode zur Entwicklung von Innovationen durch Design Thinking Coaching, Dissertation, Universität St. Gallen (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Young, I.: Mental Models: Aligning Design Strategy with Human Behavior. Rosenfeld Media, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Preece, J., Sharp, H., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th Edition. Wiley, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirschhorn, L., Gilmore, T.: The new boundaries of the ‘boundaryless’ organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70, 104–115 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Creswell, J.: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research (Sage Mixed Methods Research). Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33(7), 14–26 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saffer, D.: Designing for Interaction: Creating Innovative Applications and Devices, 2nd edn. New Riders Publishers, Berkley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Branner, J.: Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8(3), 173–184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baden, M., Wimpenny, K.: A Practical Guide to Arts-Related Research. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2014). ISBN 978-94-6209-813-8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conquergood, D.: Interventions and radical research. Drama Rev. 46(2), 145–156 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barone, T., Eisner, E.W.: Arts based educational research. In: Green, J., Camilli, G., Elmore, P. (eds.) Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, pp. 93–107. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elbaz, F.: Teacher Thinking: A Study of Practical Knowledge. Croon Helm, London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clandinin, D.J., Connelly, F.M.: Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kay, L.: Bead collage: an arts-based research method. Int. J. Educ. Arts 14(3) (2013). http://www.ijea.org/v14n3/. Accessed 2018

  20. Gerstenblatt, P.: Collage portraits as a method of analysis in qualitative research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289409882_Collage_Portraits_as_a_Method_of_Analysis_in_Qualitative_Research. Accessed 19 Apr 2018

  21. Phillips, C.B., Bellinger, A.: Feeling the cut: exploring the use of photography in social work education. Qual. Soc. Work 10(1), 86–105 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill, D.A.: The poetry in portraiture: seeing subjects, hearing voices, and feeling contexts. Qual. Inquiry 11(1), 95–105 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Witkin, S.L.: Relational poetry. Qual. Soc. Work 6(4), 477–481 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dixson, A.D.: Extending the metaphor: notions of jazz in portaiture. Qual. Inquiry 11(1), 106–137 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuhn, A.: Memory texts and memory work: performances of memory in and with visual media. Mem. Stud. 3(4), 298–313 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Butler-Kisber, L.: Collage as inquiry. In: Knowles, J.G., Cole, A.L. (eds.) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jongeward, C.: Visual portraits: integrating artistic process into qualitative research. In: Leavy, P. (ed.) Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. The Guilford Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaughan, K.: Pieced together: collage as an artist’s method for interdisciplinary research. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ. 4(1), 1–21 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heinrich, F.: On the beauty of interactive art. Int. J. Arts Technol. 1, 159 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lambert, J.: Digital Storytelling Cookbook, 3a edn. Digital Diner Press, Berkeley (2010). http://goo.gl/GzdJ0f. Accessed April 2018

  31. de Jager, A., Fogarty, A., Tewson, A., Lenette, C., Boydell, K.M.: Digital storytelling in research: a systematic review. Qual. Rep. 22(10), 2548–2582 (2017). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss10/3

  32. Lopes, A.: Using research methods in human computer interaction to design technology for resilience. J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manage. 13, 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moreno, A., Lopes, A., Mendes, M.: Grãos de Mar - Uma Poética Imersiva em Experiência Artística Interativa 6º EIMAD | Encontro de Investigação em Música, Artes e Design. Castelo Branco (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Clemmensen, T., Campos, P., Orngreen, R., Pejtersen, A.M., Wong, W. (eds.): HWID 2006. IIFIP, vol. 221. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36792-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Campos, P., Clemmensen, T., Nocera, J.A., Katre, D., Lopes, A., Ørngreen, R. (eds.): HWID 2012. IAICT, vol. 407. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41145-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Edmonds, E.: Interactive art. In: Candy, L., Edmonds, E.A. (eds.) Interacting: Art, Research and the Creative Practitioner, pp. 18–32. Libri Publishing, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thanks the students that developed the artifacts and Adriana Moreno who did the interactive artistic installation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arminda Guerra Lopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lopes, A.G. (2019). Research Methods – What Is Best for Developing and Evaluating Human Computer Interaction and Interactive Artistic Installations?. In: Barricelli, B., et al. Human Work Interaction Design. Designing Engaging Automation. HWID 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05297-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05296-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05297-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics