Advertisement

Internet of Things-Based Framework for Public Transportation Fleet Management in Non-smart City

Conference paper
  • 376 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 260)

Abstract

The notable increase in location-based applications especially in smart cities realm is driven by the emergence of miniaturized, cheaper and readily available location-based internet of things’ devices. The backbone of the internet of things is a well-orchestrated electronic infrastructure, telecommunication and information technology. Such a backbone is the precursor for the success of internet of things applications that have mushroomed in the public transportation sectors of the developed world. The developing countries such as South Africa have not kept pace with the development of these electronic infrastructures. Implementation of smart city concepts such as intelligent public transportation system in these countries therefore requires novel approaches. As one of the solutions to this, we present an internet of things framework that enables the integration of multiple cost-effective internet of things technologies through which public transport-related information can be obtained in cost-effective and robust ways. The framework was designed and evaluated using a system prototype for the Free State province (South Africa) public transport system case.

Keywords

Intelligent public transport system Internet of things framework Free State province South Africa 

References

  1. 1.
    Gama, K., Touseaui, L., Donsez, D.: Combining heterogeneous service technologies for building an internet of things middleware. Comput. Commun. 35(4), 405–417 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Telecommunication Union: ITU Internet Report 2005: The Internet of Things. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jain, A.K., Hong, L., Pankanti, S.: Internet of things - strategic research roadmap. Technical report, Cluster of European Research projects on the Internet of Things, September 2009. http://www.internet-of-things-research.eu/pdf/IoT_Cluster_Strategic_Research_Agenda_2011.pdf
  4. 4.
    Borgia, E.: The internet of things vision: key features, applications and open issues. Comput. Commun. 54, 1–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ray, P.P.: A survey on internet of things architectures. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 30 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Behrendt, F.: Why cycling matters for smart cities. Internet of bicycles for intelligent transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 56, 157–164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Padrón, G., García, C.R., Quesada-Arencibia, A., Alayón, F., Pérez, R.: Using massive vehicle positioning data to improve control and planning of public road transport. Sensors 14(4), 7342–7358 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    García, C.R., Pérez, R., Lorenzo, Á., Quesada-Arencibia, A., Alayón, F., Padrón, G.: Architecture of a framework for providing information services for public transport. Sensors 12(5), 5290–5309 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neisse, R., Baldini, G., Steri, G., Mahieu, V.: Informed consent in internet of things: the case study of cooperative intelligent transport systems. In: 2016 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), pp. 1–5. IEEE, May 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaiwartya, O., et al.: Internet of vehicles: motivation, layered architecture, network model, challenges, and future aspects. IEEE Access 4, 5356–5373 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Datta, S.K., Da Costa, R.P.F., Härri, J., Bonnet, C.: Integrating connected vehicles in internet of things ecosystems: challenges and solutions. In: 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6. IEEE, June 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rakotonirainy, A., Orfila, O., Gruyer, D.: Reducing driver’s behavioural uncertainties using an interdisciplinary approach: convergence of quantified self, automated vehicles, internet of things and artificial intelligence. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(32), 78–82 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yelmarthi, K., Abdelgawad, A., Khattab, A.: An architectural framework for low-power IoT applications. In: 2016 28th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM), pp. 373–376. IEEE, December 2016Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mhlaba, A., Masinde, M.: Implementation of middleware for internet of things in asset tracking applications: in-lining approach. In: 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pp. 460–469. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, N., Chen, H., Chen, X., Chen, J.: Semantic framework of internet of things for smart cities: case studies. Sensors 16(9), 1501 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Ryneveld, P.: 15 Year Review of Public Transport in South Africa with emphasis on metropolitan areas. Hunter van Ryneveld (Pty) (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berg, R.: Cape Town launches mobile transport app. BDlive, 20 October 2014. https://www.techcentral.co.za/cape-town-launches-transport-app/51895/
  18. 18.
    Sanral: Cameras. Sanral, South Africa (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uber: Uber Cities (2017). https://www.uber.com/en-ZA/cities/. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
  20. 20.
    National Household: Statistics South Africa (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Avenri, E.: A cumulative prospect theory approach to passengers behavior modeling: waiting time paradox revisited. Taylor and Francis (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson, B., Turner, L.A.: Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In: Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 297–319 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh, J., Singh, K.: Congestion control in vehicular ad hoc network: a review. In: Lobiyal, D.K., Mansotra, V., Singh, U. (eds.) Next-Generation Networks. AISC, vol. 638, pp. 489–496. Springer, Singapore (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6005-2_49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoßfeld, T., et al.: The memory effect and its implications on web QoE modeling. In: Teletraffic Congress (ITC), 6–9 September 2011, pp. 103–110 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for Research on Informatics for Droughts in Africa (URIDA)Central University of Technology, Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Sustainable, Urban, Roads and Transportation (SURT)Central University of Technology, Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations