Abstract
This chapter presents an overview of how the role of the state in France’s economy has been continuously changing since the 1930s. The first section describes the three waves of nationalizations of the past century, and the logic and ideas they were based on. The second section goes through the (re)privatization process of the 1986–2006 period. The third and main section of the chapter, which treats the period since the outbreak of the global financial crisis in 2008, points to the fact that state interference into the economy continues to be a dominant feature of the French policy.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The royal manufactures developed in France by Colbert can be seen as the first state-owned enterprises (Chevallier 1979, p. 16).
- 2.
It is typical that although people of the French revolution were desperate and upset about unbearably high taxes (especially on peasants), it was not the state but the aristocracy and the clergy, seen as free riders, who they blamed for the country’s economic problems (Meisel 2014, pp. 81–82).
- 3.
Following democratization, each shareholder had the right to attend the general assembly of the Bank of France (BoF), and each had only one vote irrespective of the number of shares he/she held (Banque de France 1936). Before the reform, the 200 biggest shareholders (nicknamed the 200 families) governed both BoF and the country (Brugvin 2009).
- 4.
In the programme’s own words: ‘The big and monopolized assets of the economy – i.e. energy sources, treasures of the underground, as well as the large banks, insurances companies – were to return to the Nation’ (Andrieu et al. 2014).
- 5.
For example, ITT, having allegedly taken part in the CIA-backed coup d’état against the Allende government in Chile on 11 September 1973 (Cohen 1993, p. 793).
- 6.
Protecting strategic sectors is far from being a French specialty. In the US, the 1988 ‘Exon-Florio’ amendment to the ‘Defense Production Act’ gave the president a broad mandate to limit foreign investments in strategic sectors. Since neither France nor the EU has such a legal instrument, state ownership continues to play an important role in protecting industries, deemed strategic for reasons of national security (Cour des comptes 2013, p. 28).
- 7.
There are (or at least used to be) some similarities concerning the use of public utilities as a tool for redistribution in the French conception of public services and German conception of municipal utilities. The latter was best represented by the so-called Stadtwerke (city utilities), the archetype of the German communal company, owned by the city and offering various type of public services like energy (electricity, gas, and district heat), water, sewage and transport, but also libraries and leisure centres. This solution of pooling different activities made it possible for the service provider to cross-finance the less lucrative sectors (like public transport) from the more profitable ones (e.g. energy and water), and thus to save a significant amount of tax money (Bauby and Similie 2014). According to EU regulation about liberalization of the energy market, this system has been transformed since the late 1990s through privatization and corporatization. But when cross-subsidization ceased, selling profitable services in one sector imposed fare increases in others (Kuhlmann and Fedele 2010).
- 8.
State-owned enterprises are defined as companies in which the public has a majority ownership.
- 9.
It is not a matter of chance that the amount of state aid provided to financial institutions in the EU’s biggest economies (i.e. Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands) in the context of financial and economic crisis between 2008 and 2014 was, as a share of GDP, the lowest in France (DG Competition 2016). The already mentioned common ‘cultural’ (i.e. elite network) roots of the bank managers prevented them from exposing their institutions to overly risky transactions, or at least from those transactions that gain too much importance relative to their size (Howarth 2013).
- 10.
For example, by 2015, more than two-thirds of the companies in the state’s portfolio (55 out of 81) were already transformed into public limited companies (APE 2016, p. 27).
- 11.
In the wake of these changes, the board members, instead of being appointed from a limited group of senior civil servants, could be appointed from a larger pool of experts which method fit more to companies’ interests, because the number of political nominees were reduced substantially. While in 2013 the state still participated in the nomination of 936 administrators, of which 366 represented the state directly, in 2015 these numbers fell to 765 and 272 respectively (APE 2013, p. 7; 2016, p. 17).
- 12.
We refer to economic patriotism in the sense of ‘economic choices which seek to discriminate in favour of particular social groups, firms or sectors understood by the decision-makers as insiders because of their territorial status’ (Clift and Woll 2012). As already mentioned, five footnotes earlier, there is some similarity between France and Germany. In the case of France, the social groups to be favoured are the French employees, whose interests are to be defended irrespective of the employers’ nationality. In our world of globalization, businesses in France do not necessarily need to be loss-making in order to be relocated. It is enough for them to be just marginally worse in terms of profit margins than their counterparts are somewhere else (in Eastern Europe or Asia). In the case of German cities, the social groups to be favoured are the city dwellers. As fragmentation and privatization of the multipurpose model of German local self-administration have had awkward (unintended) consequences, such as higher prices (and not only for unprofitable services like public transport), declining quality, oligopolistic tendencies—for example, the inexorable rise of the big four (E.ON, Energie Baden-Württemberg AG, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Elektrizitätswerk AG and Vattenfall) in the energy sector—and a general reduction of local council capacity for political steering, a vigorous process of re-municipalization started in German cities in the mid-2000s (Kuhlmann and Fedele 2010; Brandt 2006; Becker 2017), We can deduce that, apart from the differences in tradition and conception of the state (unitary in France and federal in Germany), this new appetite for authorities taking back control over what is considered to be important for the wellbeing of insiders or citizens, either as job holders or consumers, is the same process in both countries. So, if you call it economic patriotism in France, you can call it economic local patriotism in Germany.
- 13.
The value of SOEs to GDP in 2012 was lower than in France in only 6 out of 23 European OECD member countries. Almost all of them happen to be either federal states (like Belgium and Germany) or monarchies (like the UK or Spain), where significant competencies have been devolved to the regions (OECD 2014).
References
Andrieu, C., et al. (2014). Le programme du Conseil national de la Résistance en perspective. Histoire@ Politique n° 24. Le dossier. http://www.histoire-politique.fr/index.php?numero=24&rub=dossier&item=225
APE. (2013). L’État actionnaire – Rapport 2013. http://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/directions_services/agence-participations-etat/Documents/Rapports-de-l-Etat-actionnaire/2013/RA_APE_complet.pdf
APE. (2014). Lignes directrices de l’État actionnaire. http://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/agence-participations-etat/Documents/Textes_de_reference/Lignes_directrices_de_l’Etat_actionnaire_-_17_03_2014.pdf
APE. (2016). Rapport d’activité 2015/2016. http://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/agence-participations-etat/RAPPORT_D'ACTIVITE_APE_2015-2016.pdf
Banque de France. (1936). LOI Tendant à modifier et à compléter les Lois et statuts qui régissent la Banque de France. https://www.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/arrete.pdf#page=207
Bauby, P., & Similie, M. M. (2014). Management public et construction européenne. In Management Public (pp. 285–327). Paris: Dunod.
Bauer, M. (1988). The Politics of State-Directed Privatisation: The Case of France, 1986–88. West European Politics, 11(4), 49–60.
Becker, S. (2017). Our City, Our Grid: The Energy Remunicipalisation Trend in Germany. In Reclaiming Public Services: How Cities and Citizens Are Turning Back Privatisations (pp. 117–129). Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
Bizaguet, A. (1983). L’importance des entreprises publiques dans l’économie française et européenne après les nationalizations de 1982. Revue economique, 34(3), 434–465.
Brandt, T. (2006). Liberalization, Privatization and Regulation in the German Electricity Sector. Privatization of Public Services and the Impact on Quality, Employment and Productivity (CIT5–2006-028478). Duesseldorf.
Brugvin, T. (2009). La domination des banquiers au cœur des états. https://scholar.google.hu/scholar?q=LA+DOMINATION+DES+BANQUIERS+AU+CpercentC5percent92UR+DES+ETATS++&hl=hu&as_sdt=0percent2C5&as_ylo=2009&as_yhi=2009
Chabanas, N., & Vergeau, E. (1996). Nationalizations et privatisations depuis 50 ans. Insee Premiere No. 440, Avril 1996.
Chevallier, F. (1979). Les entreprises publiques en France – La documentation française, Notes et Études documentaires, Nos. 4507–4508, 9 Mars 1979.
Clift, B., & Woll, C. (2012). Economic Patriotism: Reinventing Control over Open Markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 307–323.
Cohen, E. (1993). Représentation de l’adversaire et politique économique: nationalization, politique industrielle et Acte unique européen. Revue française de science politique, 43(5), 788–806.
Cohen, E. (2007). Le CIRI ou l’ingénierie sociale du déclin industriel, Actes du Colloque du Creusot 2007. http://www.elie-cohen.eu/IMG/pdf/Creusot3.pdf
Cour des comptes. (2013). Les faiblesses de l’État actionnaire d’entreprises industrielles de défense, rapport public thématique. http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/var/storage/rapports-publics/134000231.pdf
DG Competition. (2016). State Aid Scoreboard 2015 – Aid in the Context of Financial and Economic Crisis. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/financial_economic_crisis_aid:en.html
Fortune.com. (2017). Fortune Global 500. http://fortune.com/global500/
Harbula, P. (2007). The Ownership Structure, Governance and Performance of French Companies. Hitelintézeti szemle, VI(5), 429–452.
Howarth, D. (2013, July). The Legacy of State-Led Finance in France and the Rise of Gallic Market-Based Banking-Governance, 26(3), 369–395. https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/14594/2/Howarthpercent20onpercent20Francepercent20andpercent20thepercent20Financialpercent20Crisispercent20Governancepercent202013.pdf
INSEE. (2016a). Emploi total par sexe. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/series-longues.asp?indicateur=emploi-total-sexe
INSEE. (2016b). Entreprises publiques. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?reg_id=0&ref_id=T16F154
INSEE. (2016c). Données détaillées sur le répertoire des entreprises contrôlées majoritairement par l’État au 31 décembre 2014. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/detail.asp?ref_id=ir-irecorecme14#RECME14_REP
Kolm, S.-C. (2010). History of Public Economics: The Historical French School. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(4), 687–718. http://sergekolm.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/HistoryPublEco7Feb10.pdf
Kuhlmann, S., & Fedele, P. (2010). New Public Management in Continental Europe: Local Government Modernization in Germany, France and Italy from a Comparative Perspective. In The Provision of Public Services in Europe. Between State, Local Government and Market (pp. 49–74). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Le Figaro. (2015a). La Banque de France garde son or sous l’eau. Le Figaro Économie/Entreprises 10/08/2015.
Le Figaro. (2015b). Actionnaires: pourquoi l’État veut imposer le droit de vote double. Le Figaro Économie/Entreprises 14/04/2015. http://www.lefigaro.fr/societes/2015/04/14/20005-20150414ARTFIG00210-actionnaires-pourquoi-l-etat-veut-imposer-le-droit-de-vote-double.php
Légifrance. (1982). Loi n° 82-155 du 11 février 1982 de nationalization. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000503960
Légifrance. (2014). LOI n° 2014-384 du 29 mars 2014 visant à reconquérir l’économie réelle [Law aiming at recapturing the real economy]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000028811102&categorieLien=id
Meisel, C. (2014). The Role of State History on Current European Union Economic Policies. Towson University Journal of International Affairs, XLVII(1), 78–97.
Musso, P. (2008). III. La dérégulation du système des télécoms. Repères, pp. 38–59.
OECD. (2014). The Size and Sectoral Distribution of SOEs in OECD and Partner Countries. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/finance-and-investment/the-size-and-sectoral-distribution-of-soes-in-oecd-and-partner-countries_9789264215610-en#.WjPygHlG3IU#page15
Vessilier, E. (1983). Aspects financiers des nationalizations. Revue économique, 34(3), 466–495.
Vie Publique. (2013). L’évolution du périmetre du secteur publique d‘entreprises – Vie Publique, Découverte des institutions, le 19.08.2013. http://www.vie-publique.fr/decouverte-institutions/institutions/approfondissements/evolution-du-perimetre-du-secteur-public-entreprises.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Somai, M. (2019). Economic Patriotism and Liberalism in Present-Day France: Changing Role of the State in French Economy. In: Gerőcs, T., Szanyi, M. (eds) Market Liberalism and Economic Patriotism in the Capitalist World-System. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05186-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05186-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05185-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05186-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)