Skip to main content

History of Evidence-Based Surgery (EBS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Surgery

Abstract

Before the introduction of Evidence-Based Surgery (EBS) and its predecessor, Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) , the art and knowledge of surgery was passed from teacher to student. A paradigm shift occurred in the 1980s and 90s when the “experiential” nature of the development of surgery in a hierarchical environment was supplanted by evidentiary rules. The EBS Movement, following the footsteps of EBM, was introduced to ensure that patients were, in fact, treated with the best available treatment , based on evidence . In this chapter, readers are introduced to a brief history of the paradigm shift of valuing evidence over authority. They will also learn about the five pillars of decision-making in practising EBS. The importance of research and EBS is highlighted in this chapter by outlining surgical training programs that have introduced EBM and EBS in their educational curricula. Finally, we highlight research guidelines and initiatives such as OMERACT, GRADE, Cochrane Collaboration, COSMIN, and EQUATOR that have been designed to improve the methodological quality and reporting of clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guyatt GH. Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club. 1991; A-16:114.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith R, Rennie D. Evidence based medicine—an oral history. BMJ. 2014;348:371–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatt A. Evolution of clinical research: a history before and beyond James Lind. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1(10):6–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Imber G. Genius on the edge: the bizarre double life of Dr. William Steweard Halsted. New York: Kaplan Publishing; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;290(10092):415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meakins JL. Innovation in surgery. Am J Surg. 2002;183:399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (CTFPHE). The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193–254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95(Supp 2):2S–4S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eddy DM, Billings J. The quality of medical evidence: implications for quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood).1988;7(1):19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eddy DM. Guidelines for the cancer related checkup: recommendations and rationale. CA: Cancer J Clin. 1980;30:3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sackett DL. How to read clinical journals: I. Why to read them and how to start reading them critically. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;124(5):555–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 1993;270(17):2093–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Levels of evidence (March) 2009. http://www.cebm.net/oxfordcentre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009. Accessed 8 Aug 2014.

  15. Archibald S, Bhandari M, Thoma A. Evidence based surgery series. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use an article about a diagnostic test. Can J Surg. 2001;44(1):17–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Urschel J, Tandan V, Miller J, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to evidence-based surgery: how to use an article evaluating surgical interventions. Can J Surg. 2001;44(2):95–100.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Thoma A, Sprague S, Tandan V. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use an article on economic analysis. Can J Surg. 2001;44:347–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong D, Tandan V, Goldsmith CH, Simunovic M. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use an article reporting population-based volume-outcome relationships in surgery. Can J Surg. 2002;45(2):109–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Birch D, Eady A, Robertson D, De Pauw S, Tandan V. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to perform a literature search. Can J Surg. 2003;46(2):136–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Montori V, Cinà C, Tandan V, Guyatt GH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2004;47(1):60–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Thoma A, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M, Tandan V. The evidence-based surgery working group. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery. Can J Surg. 2004;47(3):200–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Birch D, Goldsmith CH, Tandan V. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: self audit and practice appraisal for surgeons. Can J Surg. 2005;48(1):57–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mastracci TM, Thoma A, Farrokhyar F, Tandan VR, Cina CS. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use a decision analysis. Can J Surg. 2007;50(5):403–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thoma A, Cornacchi S, Lovrics P, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article on health-related quality of life. Can J Surg. 2008;51(3):215–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A, Haines T, Garnett A, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess power and sample size. Can J Surg. 2008;51(6):476–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hansebout R, Cornacchi SD, Haines T, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to use an article on prognosis. Can J Surg. 2009;52(4):328–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dijkman B, Kooistra B, Bhandari M. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to work with a subgroup analysis. Can J Surg. 2009;52(6):515–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Thoma A, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guides to the surgical literature: how to assess a survey in surgery. Can J Surg. 2011;54(6):394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, Levis C, Cornacchi, Haines T, Thoma A. For the evidence-based surgery working group. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: understanding confidence intervals. Can J Surg. 2012;55(3):207–11.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cornacchi SD, Goldsmith CH, Ignacy TA, Thoma A. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to evaluate clinical practice guidelines. Can J Surg. 2014;57(4):280–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Waltho D, Kaur MN, Haynes RB, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to perform a high-quality literature search. Can J Surg. 2015;58(5):349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thoma A, Kaur MN, Farrokhyar F, Waltho D, Levis C, Lovrics P, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article about harm in surgery. Can J Surg. 2016;59(5):351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gallo L, Eskicioglu C, Braga L, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article using surrogate outcomes. Can J Surg. 2017;60(4):280–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thoma A, Farrokhyar F, Waltho D, Braga LH, Sprague S, Goldsmith CH. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a noninferiority trial. Can J Surg. 2017;60(6):426–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gallo L, Murphy J, Braga L, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A. Users’ guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a qualitative study. Can J Surg. Accepted for publication October 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thoma A. Evidence-based plastic surgery: design, measurement and evaluation. Toronto Ontario: Clin Plastic Surg. 2008;35(2):ix.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bhandari M, editor. Evidence-based orthopedics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. BMJ Evid-Based Med. 2002;7:36–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Duke University. Duke Clinical Research Institute: from thought leadership to clinical practice—about us [Internet]. Duke University; 2017 [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from https://www.dcri.org/about/who-we-are/.

  40. Stanford University. Stanford Center for Clinical Research (SCCR) [Internet]. Stanford University; 2018 [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from http://med.stanford.edu/sccr.html.

  41. Farrokhyar F, Amin N, Dath D, Bhandari M, Kelly S, Kolkin AM, et al. Impact of the surgical research methodology program on surgical residents’ research profiles. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(4):513–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. OMERACT Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Welcome to OMERACT [Internet]. OMERACT [cited 19 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.omeract.org.

  43. GRADE Working Group. GRADE: welcome to the grade working group—from evidence to recommendations—transparent and sensible [Internet]. GRADE working group [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/.

  44. McMaster University Mac GRADE Centre. About GRADE [Internet]. McMaster University [cited 29 Mar 2018]. Available from https://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/aboutgrade.html.

  45. Cochrane. About Us [Internet]. Cochrane group [cited 29 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.cochrane.org/about-us.

  46. VU University Medical Center. COSMIN [Internet]. VU University [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.cosmin.nl/.

  47. The EQUATOR Network. Equator network—about us [Internet]. The EQUATOR network [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.equator-network.org/about-us/x.

  48. COMET Initiative. The COMET initiative [Internet]. COMET [cited 13 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.comet-initiative.org/.

  49. National Institute of Health (NIH). Clinicaltrials.gov [Internet]. NIH [cited 20 Mar 2018]. Available from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

  50. University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination—PROSPERO. About PROSPERO [Internet]. York [cited 29 Mar 2018]. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#aboutpage.

  51. Innes N, Schwendicke F, Lamont T. How do we create, and improve the evidence? Br Dent J. 2016;220(12):651–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achilles Thoma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thoma, A., Murphy, J., Sprague, S., Goldsmith, C.H. (2019). History of Evidence-Based Surgery (EBS). In: Thoma, A., Sprague, S., Voineskos, S., Goldsmith, C. (eds) Evidence-Based Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05120-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05120-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05119-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05120-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics