Skip to main content

The Political in Transport and Mobility: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Everyday Mobility and Transport Planning

Abstract

Transport and mobility are integrated with everyday activities in people’s lives. Transport research and planning has been characterized by utilitarian, rationalistic and quantitative epistemologies. Also, for a long time transport planning research has been gender coded as masculine. In this collection we show the importance of combining methodologies and that ‘numbers’ is useful when addressing issues of power and gender equality but also that qualitative and critical epistemologies bring important and necessary knowledge to the transport planning research field. This collection is a contribution to the research field of transport planning, representing a plurality of epistemologies—but with one important common denominator: transport planning as inheritably political practice and that transport planning research has to acknowledge the diversity of social positions when planning for equity and accessibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_1
  • Chapter length: 22 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkmar, D. (2012). On men and cars: An ethnographic study of gendered, risky and dangerous relations. Dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., Kraftl, P., Horton, J., & Tucker, F. (2009). The road less travelled: New directions in children’s and young people’s mobility. Mobilities, 4(1), 1–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., Levin, L., Abrahamsson, M., & Hagberg, J. (2014). Mobility in the transition to retirement: The intertwining of transportation and everyday projects. Journal of Transport Geography, 38, 48–54.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Mackett, R., Gong, Y., Kitazawa, K., & Paskins, J. (2008). Gender differences in children’s pathways to independent mobility. Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 385–401.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2006). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In The RoutledgeFalmer reader in gender & education (pp. 73–83). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, C., & Omrod, S. (1993). Gender in the microwave world. In Gender and technology in the making (pp. 41–74). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, L. (2007). Stuck in the slow lane: Reconceptualizing the links between gender, transport and employment. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(2), 85–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, K., Westerlund, O., & Åström, J. (2007). Flyttning och pendling i Sverige. Stockholm: Fritze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S., & Servon, L. J. (2005). Gender and planning: A reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, G., & Lindgren, G. (2010). Nätverk och skuggstrukturer i regionalpolitiken. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, T. (2008). Det uppsplittrade rummet: regionförstoring i ett genusperspektiv. Regionalpolitikens geografi: regional tillväxt i teori och praktik. In F. Andersson, R. E., & I. Molina (Eds.), Regionalpolitikens geografi: regional tillväxt i teori och praktik (pp. 257–283). 1. uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R. L., Fotel, T. N., & Kyttä, M. (2011). Children’s active travel and independent mobility in four countries: Development, social contributing trends and measures. Transport Policy, 18(5), 703–710.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gil Solá, A. (2013). På väg mot jämställda arbetsresor: vardagens mobilitet i förändring och förhandling. Dissertation, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. J. (1995). Gender, work, and space (1st ed.). London [u.a.]: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2005). Telling feminist stories. Feminist Theory, 6(2), 115–139.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Joelsson, T. (2013). Space and sensibility: Young men’s risk-taking with motor vehicles. Dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kębłowski, W., & Bassens, D. (2018). “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography, 39(3), 413–437.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koglin, T. (2015). Velomobility and the politics of transport planning. GeoJournal, 80(4), 569–586.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York/London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, R. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 567–588.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Legacy, C. (2016). Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L. (2008). Äldre kvinnor: osynliga i statistiken men närvarande i trafiken. In M. Brusman, T. Friberg, & J. Summerton (Eds.), Resande, planering, makt (pp. 23–40). Lund: Arkiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L., & Faith-Ell, C. (2011). Women and men in public consultations of road-building projects. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L., Faith-Ell, C., Scholten, C., Aretun, Å., Halling, J., & Thoresson, K. (2016). Att integrera jämställdhet i länstransportplanering: Slutredovisning av forskningsprojektet Implementering av metod för jämställdhetskonsekvensbedömning (JKB) i svensk transportinfrastrukturplanering. Lund: K2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, C. (2013a). Transport, diversity and the socially just city: The significance of gender relations. DPU, UCL & Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Medelln Campus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, C. (2013b). Travel choice reframed: ‘Deep distribution’ and gender in urban transport. Environment and Urbanization, 25(1), 47–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lindkvist Scholten, C., & Jönsson, S. (2010). Freedom of choice?: About long-distant commuters and employers approach to the effects of regional enlargement. Växjö: Växjö University, Department of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listerborn, C. (2007). Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women’s participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment. GeoJournal, 70(1), 61–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2004). Running on empty: Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. Oxford/Chicago: Policy Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, N. (2009). Genusforskning – en guide till feministisk teori, metodologi och skrift. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, N., & Braidotti, R. (Eds.). (1996). Between monsters goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. London: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Matrix (Organization). (1984). Making space: Women and the man-made environment. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Page, M., & Hull, A. (2008). Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK. Transport Policy, 15(6), 328–340.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. (1988). Women’s accessibility and transport policy in Britain. In S. Whatmore & J. Little (Eds.), Gender and geography (pp. 19–34). London: Association for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regionalpolitiska utredningens slutbetänkande. (2000). Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (2005). Women’s travel issues. In S. S. Fainstein & L. J. Servon (Eds.), Gender and planning: A reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1975). The Traffic in women. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (p. 157). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salon, D., & Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, poverty, and gender: Travel ‘choices’ of slum residents in Nairobi, Kenya. Transport Reviews, 30(5), 641–657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, C., Friberg, T., & Sandén, A. (2012). Re-reading time-geography from a gender perspective: Examples from gendered mobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(5), 584–600.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Kwan, M., & Ren, F. (2008). How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space–time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum, 39, 2109–2121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M. (2012). Mobilities. In The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization. Chichester/Malden: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uteng, T. P., & Cresswell, T. (2008). Gendered mobilities: Towards an holistic understanding. In T. P. Uteng & T. Cresswell (Eds.), Gendered mobilities (pp. 15–26). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. (1993). On the road again: Metaphors of travel in cultural criticism. Cultural Studies, 7(2), 224–239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Joelsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Joelsson, T., Scholten, C.L. (2019). The Political in Transport and Mobility: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Everyday Mobility and Transport Planning. In: Scholten, C., Joelsson, T. (eds) Integrating Gender into Transport Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05041-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)