Skip to main content

Towards a Feminist Transport and Mobility Future: From One to Many Tracks

  • 691 Accesses

Abstract

In most countries, transport is considered as the backbone of economic development and growth. The neoliberal discourse on growth, advocating market-oriented planning and decision-making, influences transport planning and policy. Transport planning and policy-making are political arenas where power relations, different interests and redistribution of resources are played out albeit these processes are seldom acknowledged and recognized. Women’s and men’s different mobilities have revealed the gendered conditions of everyday life, and new perspectives on transport have developed based on critical and feminist epistemologies. The concluding chapter of the collection furthers the debate by discussing these matters in relation to social inequality in transportation and mobility justice. It is in the tensions and public arguments revolving around transport planning investments that questions of justice and fairness in relation to power relations between different socio-economic groups, men and women, girls and boys, and corporate interests can be discussed and transformed. The way forward is to integrate the different conditions for different people depending on gender, age, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, geographical location and so on into transport planning. The transition towards more sustainable and gender-equal transport systems is foremost a structural question. By stressing on the politicalness of transport policy and planning, we are countering individualistic paradigms where the responsibility of sustainability and equality is placed solely on the individual’s practices. This is also what the title alludes to, the ambition to move from one track to many tracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_12
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Araya, D. (2015). Smart cities as democratic ecologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Balkmar, D. (2012). On men and cars: An ethnographic study of gendered, risky and dangerous relations. PhD dissertation, Linköping University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., Kraftl, P., Horton, J., & Tucker, F. (2009). The road less travelled: New directions in children’s and young people’s mobility. Mobilities, 4(1), 1–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., Levin, L., Abramsson, M., & Hagberg, J.-E. (2014). Mobility in the transition to retirement: The intertwining of transportation and everyday projects. Journal of Transport Geography, 38, 48–54.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, S., Jones, C., Land, C., & Paterson, M. (2006). Against automobility. Malden/Oxford/Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Mackett, R., Gong, Y., Kitazawa, K., & Paskins, J. (2008). Gender differences in children’s pathways to independent mobility. Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 385–401.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., & Stanley, J. (2007). No way to go: Transport and social disadvantage in Australian communities. Melbourne: Monash University ePress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., Lucas, K., Stanley, J., Morris, J., Kinnear, R., & Stanley, J. (2009). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne—Preliminary results. Transport Policy, 16(3), 97–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, L. (2007). Stuck in the slow lane: Reconceptualizing the links between gender, transport and employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(2), 85–108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice: In a globalizing world. New Left Review, 36, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R. L., Fotel, T. N., & Kyttä, M. (2011). Children’s active travel and independent mobility in four countries: Development, social contributing trends and measures. Transport Policy, 18(5), 703–710.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffron, P. (2017). Smart cities and smart mobilities. In D. Attias (Ed.), The automobile revolution (pp. 87–98). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gössling, S., & Cohen, S. (2014). Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos. Journal of Transport Geography, 39, 197–207.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. J. (1995). Gender, work, and space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, J., & Mitchell, F. (2001). Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion. Urban Studies, 38(2), 319–332.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Joelsson, T. (2013). Space and sensibility: Young men’s risk-taking with motor vehicles. PhD dissertation, Linköping University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joelsson, T. (forthcoming). Smart cities, smart mobilities and children. In T. P. Uteng, L. Levin, & H. R. Christensen (Eds.), Gendering smart mobilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., & Lucas, K. (2012). The social consequences of transport decision-making: Clarifying concepts, synthesizing knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 4–16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kębłowski, W., & Bassens, D. (2018). “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography, 39(3), 413–437.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society, 8, 131–136.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, H. (1999). ‘Gendered exclusions’: Women’s fear of violence and changing relations to space. Geografiska Annaler, 81B(2), 111–124.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Law, R. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 567–588.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L. (2008). Äldre kvinnor: osynliga i statistiken men närvarande i trafiken [Elderly women: Invisible in statistics but present in the traffic]. In M. Brusman, T. Friberg, & J. Summerton (Eds.), Resande, planering, makt [Travel, planning, power]. Lund: Arkiv Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L., & Faith-Ell, C. (2011). Women and men in public consultations of road-building projects. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listerborn, C. (2002). Trygg stad. Diskurser om rädsla i forskning, policyutveckling och lokal praktik [Safe city: Discourses on women’s fear in research, policy development and local practices]. PhD dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideri, A. (2014). Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal, 27(2), 242–256.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2004). Running on empty: Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2006). Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(10), 801–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2011). Making the connections between transport disadvantage and the social exclusion of low income populations in the Tshwane region of South Africa. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1320–1334.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2013). Transport and social inclusion. In J.-P. Rodrigue, T. Notteboom, & J. Shaw (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of transport studies. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: Applying Walzer’s ‘spheres of justice’ to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6), 1035–1053.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. New York: Routledge.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K., Golub, A., & Robinson, G. (2012). A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(4), 684–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, M. (2004). The influence of gender on daily car use and on willingness to reduce car use in Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 185–195.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, S. (2006). Understanding women’s and men’s travel patterns: The research challenge. In Research on women’s issues in transportation: Volume 1 conference overview and plenary papers, conference proceedings (Vol. 35, pp. 7–28). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salon, D., & Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, poverty, and gender: Travel ‘choices’ of slum residents in Nairobi, Kenya. Transport Reviews, 30(5), 641–657.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, C., Friberg, T., & Sandén, A. (2012). Re-reading time-geography from a gender perspective: Examples from gendered mobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(5), 584–600.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Kwan, M.-P., & Ren, F. (2008). How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space–time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum, 39, 2109–2121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit. 2003. Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion, 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ and http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/social_exclusion_task_force/assets/publications_1997_to_2006/making_transport_2003.pdf, 67.

  • Sheller, M. (2012). Sustainable mobility and mobility justice: Towards a twin transition. In J. Urry & M. Grieco (Eds.), Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society. Farnham/Burlington: Taylor and Francis.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 10–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • SOER. (2015). European environment agency. Downloaded from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/europe/urban-systems. 20 Jan 2018.

  • Song, H., Srinivasan, R., Sookoor, T., & Jeschke, S. (2017). Smart cities: Foundations and principles. New York: Wiley.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C., & Guha, R. (Eds.). (1988). Selected subaltern studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uteng, T. P., & Cresswell, T. E. (2008). Gendered mobilities. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2004). Public space and the culture of childhood. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., & Iovanna, R. (2007). Gender and the automobile: Analysis of nonwork service trips. Transportation Research Record, 2013, 54–61.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • WHO Fact Sheet. (2017). Climate change and health. Downloaded from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health. 20 Jan 2018.

  • Wretstrand, A. (2007). Comfort and safety as perceived by wheelchair-seated bus passengers. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(2–3), 205–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Joelsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Joelsson, T., Scholten, C.L. (2019). Towards a Feminist Transport and Mobility Future: From One to Many Tracks. In: Scholten, C., Joelsson, T. (eds) Integrating Gender into Transport Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05041-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05042-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)