Abstract
The Canada–US relationship is marked by higher levels of institutionalization than is commonly understood. That is because these institutions are not often examined together as a whole but in isolation, as individual pieces of a larger process of increasing interdependence, whether that interdependence exists at the para-diplomacy level through provincial and state relations, through private actor arrangements, or through federal government cooperation. In this chapter, we show that several institutional arrangements have generated outcomes that make the Canada–US relationship unique. These shared institutions designed by Canada and the United States are intended to remain accountable to sovereign governments, and therefore are, to some degree, democratically accountable. These shared institutions have, thus far, escaped scrutiny over “democratic deficits” and illegitimacy. They do, however, remain vulnerable to political reconsideration or revision by subsequent US administrations and Canadian governments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
According to John Ivison (2018) the creation of a macroeconomic committee with representatives from all three countries to consider exchange rate policy has implications for the Bank of Canada’s independence which are not fully understood.
- 2.
This section draws from “Claiming the 21st Century?” in Reflections of Canada: Illuminating Our Biggest Possibilities and Challenges at 150 Years, edited by P. Tortell and M. Young (Vancouver, BC: Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies—UBC Press, 2017).
References
Carment, David, and Joe Landry. 2017. “Claiming the 21st Century?” In Reflections of Canada: Illuminating Our Biggest Possibilities and Challenges at 150 Years, edited by P. Tortell and M. Young. Vancouver, BC: Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies-UBC Press.
Ivison, John. 2018. “Trudeau’s Claim of Victory in Trade Deal Is Hollow—Canada Was Played.” National Post, September 30. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/john-ivison-trudeaus-claim-of-victory-in-trade-deal-is-hollow-canada-was-played.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carment, D., Sands, C. (2019). Introduction. In: Carment, D., Sands, C. (eds) Canada–US Relations. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05036-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05036-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05035-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05036-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)