Summary and Key Themes: We Are the Land and the Waters

  • Janet McIntyre-MillsEmail author
Part of the Contemporary Systems Thinking book series (CST)


The symposia at the Flinders University and at Universitas Padjadjaran in West Java (December, 2017) (This symposium is linked with partnership development in Indonesia. UnPad (University of Padjadjaran) is co-hosting the symposium) spread across two geographical sites explored the challenge of increased urbanisation and movement towards cities (In Indonesia the rate of urbanisation is faster than other Asian countries: According to the World Bank: ‘Indonesia is undergoing a historic transformation from a rural to an urban economy. The country’s cities are growing faster than in other Asian countries at a rate of 4.1% per year. By 2025—in less than 10 years—Indonesia can expect to have 68% of its population living in cities’. and the implications it has for the life chances of unemployed women who become increasingly vulnerable to trafficking. Globally women, children and vulnerable members of the population face complex health, housing and social inclusion needs especially in disaster-prone areas ( warming). Since the Stern Review on Climate Change (2006), little has been achieved in terms of mitigating the rate of warming. Burn and Simmons (2006) and Finn (2016) highlight the global and regional risks associated with the effects of climate change on the most vulnerable. The border protection mentality is becoming more prevalent globally, but human trafficking, disaster and climate change are transnational issues that require a big picture approach. This paper provides an overview of the symposium and gives a sense of the key points made across the papers provided. The common theme across the two sites is the need to protect the land and to prevent exploitation of people and the environment and to find ways to protect food, energy and water security through caring for people and living systems of which they are a strand.


Intra- and cross-disciplinary approaches to urbanisation Food Energy and water insecurity 


  1. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. What is the problem represented to be? New South Wales: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Banathy, B. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battersby, J. (2012). Beyond the food desert: Finding ways to speak about urban food security in South Africa. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battersby, J. (2017). MDGs to SDGs – New goals, same gaps: The continued absence of urban food security in the post-2015 global development agenda. African Geographical Review, 36, 115–129. Retrieved from
  6. Bostrom, N. (2011). Existential risk prevention as the most important task for humanity. Oxford: Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford. Retrieved from Scholar
  7. Banathy BH. 1991. Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Educational Technology: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  8. Burn, J., & Simmons, F. (2006). Trafficking and slavery in Australia: An evaluation of victim support strategies. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 15(4), 565.Google Scholar
  9. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Crush, J., & Riley, L. (2017). Urban food security and urban bias (Hungry Cities Partnership, Discussion paper no 11).Google Scholar
  12. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  13. Finn, J. (2016). Human trafficking and natural disasters: Exploiting misery. International Affairs Review, 24, 80–99.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, B., Turner, & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (Eds.). (1980). Power/Knowledge. Harvester: Brighton.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Miller, E. (2015). Economy as ecological livelihood. In D. Bird (Ed.), Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson, K., Bird Rose, D., & Fincher, R. (2015). Manifesto for living in the anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  18. Harper, S. (2016). How population change will transform our world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Horne, D. (1967). The lucky country (3rd rev. ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPPC. (2013). The physical science basis. Retrieved from
  22. Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2014). Biodiversity. In P. B. Thompson & D. M. Kaplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics (pp. 195–202). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2003). Critical systems praxis: Participatory governance for social and environmental justice The Contemporary Systems Series. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. McIntyre-Mills, J., & De Vries, D. (2011). Identity, democracy and sustainability (p. 380). ISCE, USA, Litchfield: Emergence.Google Scholar
  25. McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, & Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation from wall street to wellbeing. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McIntyre-Mills. (2014a). Systemic ethics to support wellbeing in encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics (pp. 1708–1718). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014b). Reconsidering boundaries. In: Sociopedia, International Sociological Association (pp. 1–17). Retrieved from
  28. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014c). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017a). Planetary passport. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017b). Recognising our hybridity and interconnectedness: Implications for social and environmental justice. Contemporary Sociology, 66(2), 001139211771589. Scholar
  31. McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N. R. A., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (2017). Balancing individualism and collectivism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Norum, K. E. (2001). Appreciative design. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(4), 323–333. Scholar
  33. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. London: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierre, L., Peters, G., & Falk , M. P. (2000). Governance, Politics, and the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  35. Romm, N. R. A. (2017). Foregrounding critical systemic and indigneous ways of collective knowing toward (re) directing the anthropocene. In J. McIntyre-Mills, N. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice (pp. 37–73). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, D. B. (2005). Dislocating the frontier. Retrieved from, see
  37. Rorty, R. (1999). Achieving our country: The William E. Massey Sr. lectures in the history of American civilization. Harvard University Press. (Original publication 1998).Google Scholar
  38. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr & S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 41–58). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: Why the GDP doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ulrich, W., & Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical systems heuristics. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 242–292). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations Human Development Index. (2003). A compact among nations to end poverty. New York: UNDP, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). Retrieved from
  44. United Nations. (2014). World urbanisation prospects. Retrieved from
  45. United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007).
  46. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2017).
  47. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015–2030). Sendai framework. Retrieved from
  48. Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in research and evaluation. Human inquiry for living systems. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  49. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations