Victim, Rival, Bully: Influencers’ Narrative Cultures Around Cyberbullying

  • Crystal AbidinEmail author


Influencers are among the most conspicuous, crucial, and contentious stakeholders pertaining to cyberbullying. As opinion leaders for young internet users, Influencers communicate with followers through their effective digital strategies applied across a variety of potentially-integrated digital platforms. This vernacular knowledge of digital environments sits at the intersection of relatability politics, attention gaming economies, and self-branding cultures. Unlike anonymous internet trolls, Influencers are nonymous self-branded personae, deeply invested in their reputation metrics. They are also unlike everyday users on the internet, being more conditioned to cope with negativity and social aggression, or even appropriating such negativity for revenge or to further promote their brand. Consequently, Influencers practice a variety of discursive strategies around cyberbullying, including positioning the self as victim, rival, and bully. This paper discusses how Influencers develop and perform four positional narratives around cyberbullying, including: cyberbullying experienced pre-celebrity, in which they speak of digital tools as platforms for recovery and self-care; cyberbullying experienced with microcelebrity, in which they use their platforms to share coping strategies, steer and direct conversation among peers and followers, and advocate for internet safety campaigns; cyberbullying directed towards fellow Influencers, in which transient leadership on healthy internet culture and group policing emerges; and cyberbullying everyday users, in which notorious Influencers become perceived as anti-examples in local communities and new discursive spaces around internet visibility, voice, and responsibility open up in tandem with media virality. The data presented in this paper are developed from in-depth content analysis of the digital estates of a group of young Influencers in Singapore, and supported by ethnographically-informed interpretations from long-term traditional anthropological participant observation.


  1. Abidin, C. (2013). Cyber-BFFs: Assessing women’s ‘perceived interconnectedness’ in Singapore’s commercial lifestyle blog industry. Global Media Journal Australian Edition, 7(1).Google Scholar
  2. Abidin, C. (2014). Privacy for profit: Commodifying privacy in lifestyle blogging. Selected papers of internet research 15: The 15th annual meeting of the association of internet researchers. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
  3. Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, 8.
  4. Abidin, C. (2016). Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online? Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abidin, C. (2017a). #familygoals: Family influencers, calibrated amateurism, and justifying young digital labour. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Abidin, C. (2017b). Sex bait: Sex talk on commercial blogs as informal sexuality education. In L. Allen & M. L. Rasmussen (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of sexuality education (pp. 493–508). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Abu Baker, J. (2015). Protection from Harassment Act: 5 things you need to know about the landmark legislation. The Straits Times, 15 January. Retrieved November 5, 2017 from
  8. Amnesty International. (2017). Amnesty International Report 2016/17: The state of the world’s human rights. Amnesty International. Retrieved November 1, 2017 from
  9. Clark, R. (2016). ‘Hope in a hashtag’: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiFranzo, D., Taylor, S. H., Kazerooni, F., Wherry, O. D., & Bazarova, N. N. (2018). Upstanding by design: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal 21–26 April. Retrieved March 19, 2017 from
  11. (2015). Singapore is the Second Highest Nation of Cyberbullies. Scoop, 19 January. Retrieved October 11, 2017
  12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  13. Hio, L. (2017). Campaign for a better internet launched, with focus on cyberbullying, fake news. The Straits Times, 7 February. Retrieved November 5, 2017 from
  14. Husna, N. (2017). COMMENT: A clear line between jokes and sexual harassment must be drawn. Yahoo! News, 13 October. Retrieved November 5, 2017 from
  15. Jacobs, N. C., Völlink, T., Dehue, F., & Lechner, L. (2015). “The Development of a Self-Report Questionnaire on Coping with Cyberbullying: The Cyberbullying Coping Questionnaire.” Societies, 5(2), 460–491. Scholar
  16. Johnston, J. (2017). Subscribing to sex edutainment: Sex education, online video, and the youtube star. Television & New Media, 18(1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koh, V. (2015). MDA’s move reflects light touch towards content regulation: Analysts. Channel News Asia, 4 May. Retrieved April 14, 2016 from
  18. Liang, H. (2015). Blogger Grace Tan Files Protection Order Against Xiaxue, Calls For Action Against Cyberbullying. Vulcan Post, 30 March. Retrieved October 5, 2017 from
  19. Lim, A. (2001). Intelligent Island discourse: Singapore’s discursive negotiation with Technology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(3), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loke, K. F. (2015). Naming and shaming online: Civic duty, or cyber bullying? Channel News Asia, 10 November. Retrieved October 11, 2017 from
  21. Macháčková, H., Černá, A., Ševčíková, A., Dědková, L., & Daneback, K. (2013). “Effectiveness of Coping Strategies for Victims of Cyberbullying.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(3).
  22. Machmutow, K., Perren, S., Sticca, F., & Alsaker, F. D. (2012). “Peer Victimization and Depressive Symptoms: Can Specific Coping Strategies Buffer the Negative Impact of Cybervictimization?” Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17(3–4), 403–420. Scholar
  23. Mak, I. (2014). A teen’s-eye view of cyber-bullying. Association of women for action and research, 22 January. Last accessed 7 December 2018 from
  24. Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved March 19, 2018 from
  25. Media Literacy Council. (2016). Best practices: Be a smart digital citizen. Media Literacy Council. Retrieved October 11, 2016 from
  26. Ministry of Education. (2014). 2014 syllabus cyber wellness secondary. Ministry of Education Singapore. Retrieved October 11, 2017 from
  27. Ng, H. (2017). Socialite Jamie Chua withdraws anti-harassment suit against business partner. The Straits Times, 18 January. Retrieved October 5, 2017 from
  28. Premaratne, U. (2017). What to do if you are a victim of online harassment. The New Paper, 8 July. Retrieved November 5, 2017 from
  29. Raskauskas, J., & Huynh, A. (2015). “The Process of Coping with Cyberbullying: A Systematic Review.” Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23(118–25). Scholar
  30. Reporters Without Borders. (2013). Government subjects news websites to licensing requirement. Reporters Without Borders, 30 May. Retrieved November 1, 2017 from
  31. Reporters Without Borders. (2014). Reporters Without Borders calls for support for blogger Roy Ngerng. Reporters Without Borders, 17 July. Retrieved November 1, 2017 from
  32. Reporters Without Borders. (2017). Intolerant government, self-censorship. Reporters Without Borders. Retrieved November 1, 2017 from
  33. Shaw, F. (2016). ‘Bitch I Said Hi’: The Bye Felipe campaign and discursive activism in mobile dating apps. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sin, Y. (2016). Cyber bullying linked to self-harm among the young in Singapore: Study. The Straits Times, 11 March. Retrieved October 11, 2017 from
  35. STOMP. (2016). Home page. STOMP. Retrieved October 11, 2017 from
  36. Tai, J. (2014). 1 in 4 secondary students ‘admits to cyber bullying’. The Straits Times, 14 July. Retrieved October 3, 2017 from
  37. Telecom Infotech Forum. (2007). Singapore’s Broadband Future: the iN2015 Initiative. Retrieved November 3, 2017 from–06_TIF_SGsBBFuture.IN2015Initiative_BriefingPaper.pdf.
  38. Teng, A. (2015). Bullying takes on a whole new dimension in cyberspace. The Straits Times, 28 September. Retrieved October 20, 2017 from
  39. Today, (2017). Harassment over LGBT views unacceptable, says Shanmugam. Today, 27 June. Retrieved November 5, 2017 from
  40. Wong-Lo, M., & Bullock, L. M. (2014). Digital metamorphosis: Examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 418–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yong, D. (2008). Virtual catfight The Straits Times, 20 July. Retrieved October 5, 2017 from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  3. 3.PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations