Looking Ahead: Conclusions and Reflections

  • Michael KellyEmail author
  • Hilary Footitt
  • Myriam Salama-Carr


The Conclusion reviews some of the key issues that have been raised in the studies of conceptual spaces and of sources and documentation. It examines some questions arising from the enhanced understanding of the actors and institutions involved, and from the insights gained in the case studies of language in particular conflicts. These issues and questions lay the basis for a new agenda for research. We examine how they might offer new challenges to the main disciplines that have contributed to understanding languages and conflict, and we suggest how they might also shape future directions in academic work more broadly and in the work of practitioners.


  1. Baker, Mona. 2006. Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkawi, Tarak. 2006. Globalization and War. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Boéri, Julie, and Jesús de Manuel Jerez. 2011. “From Training Skilled Practitioners to Educating Reflective Citizens: A Narrative Approach to Socio-critical Pedagogy and Action-Research in Conference Interpreting.” Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delgado Luchner, Carmen, and Leïla Kherbiche. 2018. Without Fear or Favour? The Positionality of ICRC and UNHCR Interpreters in the Humanitarian Field.
  5. Development Concepts and Doctrine Centre. 2009. Joint Doctrine Note 1/09. The Significance of Culture to the Military. Bicester: DSDA Operations Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Freedman, Lawrence. 2017. The Future of War: A History. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Gross, Michael L., and Tamar Meisels, eds. 2017. Soft War: The Ethics of Unarmed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Haraway, Donna J. 1992. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Inghilleri, Moira. 2005. “Mediating Zones of Uncertainty.” The Translator 11 (1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inghilleri, Moira. 2009. “Translation in War Zones: Ethics under Fire in Iraq.” In Globalization, Political Violence and Translation, ed. Esperanza Bielsa and Christopher W. Hughes, 207–221. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inghilleri, Moira. 2017. Translation and Migration. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Keane, John. 1996. Reflections on Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Maier, Carol. 2007. “The Translator’s Visibility: The Rights and Responsibilities Thereof.” In Translating and Interpreting Conflict, ed. Myriam Salama-Carr, 251–266. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. O’Brien, Sharon. 2016. “Training Translators for Crisis Communication: Translators without Borders as an Example.” In Mediating Emergencies and Conflicts, ed. Federico M. Federici, 85–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pratt, Mary Louise. 2008. Imperial Eyes. Travel Writing and Transculturation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Pratt, Mary Louise. 2009. “Harm’s Way: Language and the Contemporary Arts of War.” PMLA 124 (5): 1515–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tipton, Rebecca. 2011. “Relationship of Learning between Military Personnel and Interpreters in Situations of Violent Conflict. Dual Pedagogies and Communities of Practice.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 5 (1): 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Westad, Odd Arne. 2007. The Global Cold War. Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Kelly
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hilary Footitt
    • 2
  • Myriam Salama-Carr
    • 3
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.University of ReadingReadingUK
  3. 3.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations