Skip to main content

Conclusion: Resilience for Whom?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Recovery Through the Lens of Justice
  • 484 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter constitutes the final call to action, asking policy makers, emergency managers, disaster professionals, and other interested parties to take a closer look at the role that current policies around disasters play in creating and perpetuating injustice. As the previous chapters bring to light, disaster recovery policies and programs have routinely and repeatedly failed to prioritize human rights and failed to acknowledge the dynamic pressures and complex history of disaster risk creation in the United States. The prevailing narratives surrounding climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction, both extremely pressing in the current fiscal and environmental climate, have been willfully colorblind, perpetuating existing inequalities while fostering a climate of blame. The chapter argues that the definition and framing of resilience utilized by policy makers, professionals, and communities cannot be value neutral; the question must always be asked: resilience for whom?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is particularly true when one looks at operational definitions utilized in practice and policy, as well as those definitions that form the basis of data-driven indices.

References

  • Hunold, C., & Young, I. M. (1998). Justice, Democracy, and Hazardous Siting. Political Studies, XLVI, 82–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C., Costa, K., & Edelman, S. (2017, October). Safe, Strong, and Just Rebuilding After Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria: A Policy Road Map for Congress. Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, M., & Fowler, D. (2015). Lessons from Texas: 10 Years of Disaster Recovery Examined. Texas Appleseed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Jerolleman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jerolleman, A. (2019). Conclusion: Resilience for Whom?. In: Disaster Recovery Through the Lens of Justice. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04795-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics