Abstract
Different service providers compete to win high valued IT service contracts in a tender kind of process, by providing comprehensive solutions that would fulfil the requirements of their client. Client requirements include services such as account management, storage systems, databases, and migrating the client infrastructure to the cloud. Preparing a solution is a step-wise process where a client shares the Request for Proposals (RFP) which documents the details of services required, and then service providers prepare solutions to fulfil these RFPs. The latter, usually referred to as “solutioning”, can be a lengthy, time-consuming process. Therefore, solutioning automation could result in efficiency increases and cost reductions for the providers. In this paper, we propose an automated, cognitive, end-to-end solutioning methodology that is comprised of 3 steps. The first step involves a textual analytics approach for mining the RFP documents, and extracting the client requirements and constraints. Second, we formulate an optimization model that chooses the optimal set of offerings (that the provider can offer) and their attribute values that cover the client requirements at a minimum cost. Finally, we require market benchmarks to compute pricing of the chosen offerings. Market benchmarks are sometimes unknown for some offerings or for some attributes of these offerings. Thus, in that third step, we show an iterative method to estimate the missing benchmarks along with a confidence score. We validate our methodology by applying it to a real-world application with a comprehensive dataset. We show that it takes minutes to run our method, compared to the days and sometimes weeks for the case of manual solutioning. We also illustrate that our methodology provides more accurate solutions compared to manual solutioning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akkiraju R, Smith M, Greenia D, Jiang S, Nakamura T, Mukherjee D, Pusapaty S. On pricing complex IT service solutions. In: Service research and innovation institute global conference; 2014. p. 55–64.
Chiticariu L, Krishnamurthy R, Li Y, Raghavan S, Reiss F, Vaithyanathan S. SystemT: an algebraic approach to declarative information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL’10). Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA; 2010. p. 128–37.
Fukuda MA, Gajananan K, Jiang S, Megahed A, Nakamura T, Smith MA. Effectiveness of service complexity configurations in top-down complex services design. U.S. Patent Application 14/977,383, filed 22 June 2017.
Fukuda MA, Gajananan K, Jiang S, Megahed A, Nakamura T, Smith MA. Method and system for determining an optimized service package model for market participation. U.S. Patent Application 15/050,986, filed 24 August 2017.
Fukuda MA, Gajananan K, Jiang S, Megahed A, Nakamura T, Smith MA. Augmenting missing values in historical or market data for deals. U.S. Patent Application 15/192,875, filed 28 December 2017.
Fukuda MA, Gajananan K, Jiang S, Megahed A, Nakamura T, Smith MA. Top-down pricing of a complex service deal. U.S. Patent Application 15/192,884, filed 28 December 2017.
Gajananan K, Megahed A, Abe M, Nakamura T, Smith M. A top-down pricing algorithm for IT service contracts using lower level service data. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC); 2016. p. 720–7.
Gamma N, Do Mar Rosa M, Da Silva M. IT services reference catalog. In: IFIP/IEEE international symposium on integrated network management (IM); 2013. p. 764–7.
Greenia D, Qiao M, Akkiraju R. A win prediction model for IT outsourcing bids. In: Service research and innovation institute global conference; 2014. p. 39–42.
IBM ILOG CPLEX CPLEX, V12.1: User’s Manual for CPLEX. International Business Machines Corporation; 2009.
Iosup A, Ostermann S, Yigitbasi MN, Prodan R, Fahringer T, Epema D. Performance analysis of cloud computing services for many-tasks scientific computing. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst. 2011;22(6):931–45.
Kahn BK, Strong DM, Wang RY. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Commun ACM. 2002;45(4):184–92.
Lueger RJ, Barkham M. Using benchmarks and benchmarking to improve quality of practice and services. In: Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: a guide for the psychological therapies; 2010. p. 223–56.
Megahed A, Asthana S, Becker V, Nakamura T, Gajananan K. A method for selecting peer deals in IT service contracts. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on AI mobile services (AIMS); 2017. p. 1–7.
Megahed A, Gajananan K, Abe M, Jiang S, Smith M, Nakamura T. Pricing IT services deals: a more agile top-down approach. In: International conference on service-oriented computing (ICSOC). Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 461–73.
Megahed A, Gajananan K, Asthana S, Becker V, Smith M, Nakamura T. Top-down pricing of IT services deals with recommendation for missing values of historical and market data. In: International conference on service-oriented computing (ICSOC). Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 745–60.
Megahed A, Ren GJ, Firth M. Modeling business insights into predictive analytics for the outcome of IT service contracts. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC); 2015. p. 515–21.
Megahed A, Yin P, Nezhad HRM. An optimization approach to services sales forecasting in a multi-staged sales pipeline. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC). IEEE; 2016. p. 713–9.
Nissinen A, Grnroos J, Heiskanen E, Honkanen A, Katajajuuri JM, Kurppa S, Mkinen T, Menp I, Seppl J, Timonen P, Usva K. Developing benchmarks for consumer-oriented life cycle assessment-based environmental information on products, services and consumption patterns. J Clean Prod. 2007;15(6):538–49.
O’Mahony M, Oulton N, Vass J. Market services: productivity benchmarks for the UK. Oxford Bull Econ Stat. 1998;60(4):529–51.
Saavedra RH, Smith AJ. Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction. ACM Trans Comput Syst (TOCS). 1996;14(4):344–84.
Wang L, Zhan J, Luo C, Zhu Y, Yang Q, He Y, Gao W, Jia Z, Shi Y, Zhang S, Zheng C. Bigdatabench: a big data benchmark suite from internet services. In: 2014 IEEE 20th international symposium on high performance computer architecture (HPCA); 2014. p. 488–99.
Wolsey LA, Nemhauser GL. Integer and combinatorial optimization. Wiley; 2014.
Yin P, Nezhad HRM, Megahed A, Nakamura T. A progress advisor for IT service engagements. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on services computing (SCC). IEEE; 2015. p. 592–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Asthana, S., Megahed, A., Nazeem, A. (2019). Cognitive Solutioning of Highly-Valued IT Service Contracts. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R. (eds) Advances in Service Science. INFORMS-CSS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04725-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04726-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)