The Emergency Manager as Risk Manager

  • Patrick S. RobertsEmail author
  • Kris Wernstedt
  • Joseph Arvai
  • Kelly Redmond
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)


Emergency management as an institution has grown in size and scope in recent decades, but has this emergent profession brought better public decisions about managing hazards and risks? The evidence is mixed because though emergency managers have acted wisely and heroically, they are subject to institutional constraints as well as the same decision biases and barriers that affect other experts and professionals. We propose that emergency management can be improved and hazard vulnerability lessened more readily through better decision processes than through the traditional approach of incremental improvements in the quality of information. The current fascination with “big data” focuses on more and better information, but emergency and hazards managers should ensure that they use the data they already have access to well.


Emergency management Professions Institutions Decision making 


  1. Arvai, J., Gregory, R., Bessette, D., & Campbell-Arvai, V. (2012). Decision support for developing energy strategies. Issues in Science and Technology, 28(4), 43–52.Google Scholar
  2. Arvai, J., & Post, K. (2012). Risk management in a developing country context: Improving decisions about point-of-use water treatment among the rural poor in Africa. Risk Analysis, 32(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvai, J. L., Gregory, R., & McDaniels, T. L. (2001). Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication. Risk Analysis, 21(6), 1065–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arvai, J., & Gregory, R. (2003). Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(8), 1469–1476.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, E. J. (1995). Public response to hurricane probability forecasts. The Professional Geographer, 47(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, G. (2013). Public warnings—Why crying wolf is downright bad. Emergency Management blog. Available at: Last accessed 24 July 2016.
  7. Baumgart, L A., Bass, E. J., Philips, B., & Kloesel, K. (2006). Emergency management decision-making during severe weather. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Sage Publications, 50(3), 381–385. Google Scholar
  8. Carver, L., & Turoff, M. (2007). Human-computer interaction: The human and computer as a team in emergency management information systems. Communications of the ACM, 50(3), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choi, S. O. (2008). Emergency management: Implications from a strategic management perspective. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1), 1547–7355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, J. M., & Murphy, B. L. (2014). Rural hazard risk communication and public education: Strategic and tactical best practices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10(1), 292–304.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, L. L. (2012). Personal interview, Eugene, Oregon, March 7.Google Scholar
  12. Cutter, S. L. (2003). GI science, disasters, and emergency management. Transactions in GIS, 7(4), 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donner, W. R. (2008). Decision making as community adaptation: a case study of emergency managers in Oklahoma. Disasters, 32(2), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrier, N., & Emdad Haque, C. (2003). Hazards risk assessment methodology for emergency managers: A standardized framework for application. Natural Hazards, 28(2–3), 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fogli, D., & Guida, G. (2013). Knowledge-centered design of decision support systems for emergency management. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gadomski, A. M., Bologna, S., Di Costanzo, G., Perini, A., & Schaerf, M. (2001). Towards intelligent decision support systems for emergency managers: The IDA approach. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2(3–4), 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Van Den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory, R., & Long, G. (2009). Using structured decision making to help implement a precautionary approach to endangered species management. Risk Analysis, 29(4), 518–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., & Fields, D. (2001). Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(3), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., & Ohlson, D. (2012). Structured decision making: A practical guide to environmental management choices. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregory, R., Arvai, J., & Gerber, L. R. (2013). Structuring decisions for managing threatened and endangered species in a changing climate. Conservation Biology, 27(6), 1212–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions (Vol. 226). Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoetmer, G. J. (1991). Introduction. In G. J. Hoetmer & T. E. Drabek (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. xvii–xxxiv). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, J. (2013). Research standards for the academic discipline of emergency management.
  27. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kenney, L., Bessette, D., & Arvai, J. (2015). Structuring decisions about energy in developing communities: An example from Canada’s north. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(5), 855–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, N. L., & Scott Tindale, R. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103(4), 687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R. S., & Fields, D. (1999). Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Analysis, 19(3), 497–510.Google Scholar
  35. McEntire, D. A. (2006). Disciplines, disasters and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends from the research literature, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Emergency Management Institute.
  36. McEntire, D. A. (2007). Local emergency management organizations. In H. Rodrigues, E. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 168–182). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGuire, M. (2009). The new professionalism and collaborative activity in local emergency management. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The collaborative public manager new ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 71–93). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, B. L. (2007). Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Natural Hazards, 41(2), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicholls, N. (1999). Cognitive illusions, heuristics, and climate prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(7), 1385–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paton, D., & Flin, R. (1999). Disaster stress: An emergency management perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 8(4), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillips, B. D. (2003). Disasters by discipline: Necessary dialogue for emergency management education. Paper presented at the “Creating Educational Opportunities for the Hazards Manager of the 21stCentury” workshop, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  43. Pine, J. C. (2004). Research needs to support the emergency manager of the future. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 1, 1.Google Scholar
  44. Roberts, P. S., & Wernstedt, K. (2016). Using climate forecasts across a state’s emergency management network. Natural Hazards Review, 17(3), 1–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sink, S. A. (1995). Determining the public’s understanding of precipitation forecasts: Results of a survey. National Weather Digest, 19(3), 9–15.Google Scholar
  46. Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50(5), 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thompson, S., Altay, N., Green, W. G., III, & Lapetina, J. (2006). Improving disaster response efforts with decision support systems. International Journal of Emergency Management, 3(4), 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tufekci, S., & Wallace, W. (1998). The emerging area of emergency management and engineering. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions, 45(2), 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van De Walle, B., Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (2014). Information systems for emergency management. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Wart, M., & Kapucu, N. (2011). Crisis management competencies: The case of emergency managers in the USA. Public Management Review, 13(4), 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waugh, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wernstedt, K., & Hersh, R. (2004). Climate forecasts and flood planning under the reign of ENSO. Natural Hazards Review, 5(2), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wernstedt, K., Roberts, P., & Dull, M. (2009). Can climate signals inform emergency management? Preliminary evidence. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wernstedt, K., Roberts, P., Arvai, J., and Redmond, K. (2019). How emergency managers (mis?) interpret forecasts. Disasters 43(1), 88–109.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, J., & Oyola-Yemaiel, A. (2001). The evolution of emergency management and the advancement towards a profession in the United States and Florida. Safety Science, 39(1), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson, R. S., & Arvai, J. L. (2010). Why less is more: Exploring affect-based value neglect. Journal of Risk Research, 13(4), 399–409.Google Scholar
  57. Winkler, R. L., & Clemen, R. T. (2004). Multiple experts vs. multiple methods: Combining correlation assessments. Decision Analysis, 1(3), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick S. Roberts
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kris Wernstedt
    • 1
  • Joseph Arvai
    • 2
  • Kelly Redmond
    • 3
  1. 1.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAlexandriaUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Desert Research InstituteRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations