Skip to main content

Sidelobe Control and Monopulse Weighting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electronically Scanned Arrays (ESAs) and K-Space Gain Formulation
  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

Taylor weighting is often used in ESAs to control peak sidelobe levels below that resulting from uniform weighting. Examples of Taylor weights are given, and the effect of weighting on peak gain, maximum sidelobe level, beamwidth, and ISL performance metrics is shown. Octagonally shaped ESAs, possibly resulting from turning off corner elements of a square array, are discussed as a technique to reduce peak sidelobes. Another control technique is to rotate one of the sidelobe planes relative to the other of a square array with elements turned off to form a parallelogram. Finally, weighting schemes for phase-comparison monopulse are described, including Bayliss weights and a simpler to implement scheme referred to as split-Taylor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One should keep in mind that sidelobe levels and null depths in particular are quite sensitive to array imperfections, as these are where the voltages from all elements in the array add together in a very specific manner.

  2. 2.

    Using Mathematica, that is.

  3. 3.

    Taylor 2-D weights for the sum beam; Bayliss k x weights and Taylor k y weights for the Δx beam; and Bayliss k y weights and Taylor k x weights for the Δy beam

  4. 4.

    Of course if one digitally samples the output of each element, then this issue is moot.

  5. 5.

    It may be that uniform weighting is the best option for the one weight per element case in situations where sidelobe levels near the main beam are important.

References

  • Bayliss, E. T. (1968, May–June). Design of monopulse antenna difference patterns with low sidelobes. Bell System Technical Journal, 47(5), 623–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. S. (1975, January). Design of Line Source Antennas for narrow Beamwidth and asymmetric low Sidelobes. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, AP-23, 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailloux, R. J. (2005). Phased Array antenna handbook (2nd ed.). Boston: Artech House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. T. (1955, January). Design of line source antenna for narrow beam width and low side lobes. IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 3, 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Trees, H. L. (2002). Optimum array processing. New York: Wiley Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dana, R.A. (2019). Sidelobe Control and Monopulse Weighting. In: Electronically Scanned Arrays (ESAs) and K-Space Gain Formulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04678-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04678-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04677-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04678-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics