Populism and Contemporary Global Media: Populist Communication Logics and the Co-construction of Transnational Identities

  • Precious N. Chatterje-DoodyEmail author
  • Rhys Crilley
Part of the Global Political Sociology book series (GLPOSO)


The study of populism has often focused on specific leaders or movements within nation-states. Such accounts approach the media as a dissemination tool of these ‘populist actors’, rather than as a producer of populism in itself. However, the ongoing development of new media technologies makes such an approach untenable. With populism understood as a particular set of communication logics in which core appeals are articulated, the contemporary global media environment has fundamentally altered the processes by which such appeals evolve, including the range of voices that contribute to that evolution. Where empirically-observable populism was once predominantly a national phenomenon, this is decreasingly the case. On- and offline transnational collaboration is becoming increasingly common, together with the emergence of genuinely international movements. This chapter updates discussions of populism and the media, by offering an empirically-grounded discussion of how new media technologies facilitate transnational co-production and dissemination of populist appeals amongst both core and peripheral audiences. Our discussions of legacy media developments, online grassroots campaigning and state-funded international broadcasting show how media actors themselves (including particular platforms) contribute to the production of populist messages and identities, especially because new media logics closely correspond to the needs of populist communication.


Populism Global media Clickbait News Populist communication logics Social media 


  1. Albertazzi, Daniele, and Duncan McDonnel. 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ghazzi, O. 2014. Citizen Journalism in the Syrian Uprising: Problematizing Western Narratives in a Local Context. Communication Theory 24 (4): 435–454. Scholar
  3. Allan, S. 2013. Citizen Witnessing: Revisioning Journalism in Times of Crisis, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barthel, M. 2017. Despite Subscription Surges for Largest U.S. Newspapers, Circulation and Revenue Fall for Industry Overall. Pew Research Center, June 1.
  5. Bartlett, J., J. Birdwell, and M. Littler. 2011. The New Face of Digital Populism. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  6. Baggini, Julian. 2016. Jeremy Corbyn Is a Great Populist: But That’s No Good for Our Democracy. The Guardian, July 25.
  7. BBC. 2018. John McDonnell Urges Labour MPs to Stop Appearing on Russia Today, March 11.
  8. Bebawi, S., and D. Bossio. 2014. Social Media and the Politics of Reportage: The ‘Arab Spring’. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, W.L., and J.B. Manheim. 2006. The One-Step Flow of Communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 608 (1): 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bleiker, R. 2015. Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 43 (3): 872–890. Scholar
  11. Blummler, J.G., and D. Kavanagh. 1999. The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bos, L., and K. Brants. 2014. Populist Rhetoric in Politics and Media: A Longitudinal Study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication 29 (6): 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bos, L., W. van der Brug, and C. de Vreese. 2011. How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Political Communication 28 (2): 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brassett, J. 2016. British Comedy, Global Resistance: Russell Brand, Charlie Brooker and Stewart Lee. European Journal of International Relations 22 (1): 168–191. Scholar
  15. Bray, J. 2002. Innovation and the Communications Revolution: From the Victorian Pioneers to Broadband Internet Stevenage. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brundidge, J. 2010. Political Discussion and News Use in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The ‘Acessibility’ and ‘Traversability’ of the Internet. Javnost—The Public 17 (2): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canovan, M. 2004. Populism for Political Theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Comaroff, J. 2011. Populism and Late Liberalism: A Special Affinity? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 637 (1): 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cranmer, M. 2011. Populist Communication and Publicity: An Empirical Study of Contextual Differences in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crilley, R. 2017. Seeing Syria: The Visual Politics of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces on Facebook. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 10 (2): 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Cleen, B., and Y. Stavrakakis. 2017. Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism. Javnost—The Public 24 (4): 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Cleen, B., J. Glynos, and A. Mondon. 2018. Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement. Organization, Online First. Scholar
  24. Deegan-Krause, K., and T. Haughton. 2009. Toward a More Useful Conceptualization of Populism: Types and Degrees of Populist Appeals in the Case of Slovakia. Politics and Policy 37 (4): 821–841. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dowling, T. 2017. 24-hour Putin People: My Week Watching Kremlin ‘Propaganda Channel’ RT. The Guardian, November 29.
  26. Economist. 2010. Western State-Backed News Outfits Are Struggling to Keep Their Influence. The Economist, August 12.
  27. Engesser, S., N. Ernst, F. Esser, and F. Büchel. 2016. Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology. Information, Communication & Society 20 (8): 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Engesser, S., N. Fawzi, and A.O. Larsson. 2017. Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue. Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1279–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuchs, C. 2018. Authoritarian Capitalism, Authoritarian Movements and Authoritarian Communication. Media, Culture and Society 40 (5): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galeotti, M. 2017. Russia’s Meddling Gets More Credit Than It Deserves. New Eastern Europe, July 31.
  31. Gerbaudo, P. 2018. Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity? Media, Culture and Society 40 (5): 745–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gidron, N., and B. Bonikowski. 2013. Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda. Weatherhead Working Paper Series, No. 13-0004.
  33. Groshek, J., and J. Engelbert. 2013. Double Differentiation in a Cross-National Comparison of Populist Political Movements and Online Media Uses in the United States and the Netherlands. New Media and Society 15 (2): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawkins, K.A. 2009. Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–1067. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Helmus, Todd C., Elizabeth Bodine-Baron, et al. 2018. Russian Social Media Influence: Understanding Russian Propaganda in Eastern Europe. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Google Scholar
  36. Hunston, S. 2017. Donald Trump and the Language of Populism. University of Birmingham. Accessed 25 July 2018.
  37. Hutchison, E. 2014. A Global Politics of Pity? Disaster Imagery and the Emotional Construction of Solidarity After the 2004 Asian Tsunami. International Political Sociology 8 (1): 1–19. Scholar
  38. Indy100. 2018a. Trump Keeps Complaining About How Much the Russia Investigation is Costing. His Mar-a-Lago Trips Have Cost More. Indy100, May.
  39. Indy100. 2018b. Veteran Group Condemns Trump for ‘Inappropriate’ Memorial Day Tweet. Indy100, May 2015.
  40. Indy100. 2018c. People Have Noticed Something Worrying About Trump’s ‘Tamed a Continent’ Speech. Indy100, May 2015.
  41. Indy100. 2018d. 8 of the Biggest Conspiracy Theories That Trump Has Shared. Indy100, May 2015.
  42. Indy100. 2018e. A Reality TV Star Met Kim Kardashian at the White House and It Became a Meme. Indy100, May 31.
  43. Indy100. 2018f. People Are Convinced Kim Jong-un’s Giant Letter to Trump was a Joke About His ‘Tiny Hands’. Indy100.
  44. Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash, July 29. HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026.
  45. Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaltwasser, C.R. 2012. The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy. Democratization 19 (2): 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kraemer, B. 2014. Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on Its Effects. Communication Theory 24 (1): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krasniak, M. 2017. How Bloggers Monetize: New Research, Social Media Examiner, October 12.
  49. Kriesi, H. 2014. The Populist Challenge. West European Politics 37 (2): 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  51. Lynch, M. 2014. Media, Old and New. In The Arab Uprisings Explained: New Contentious Politics in the Middle East, ed. M. Lynch, 93–109. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lynch, M., D. Freelon, and S. Aday. 2014. Syria’s Socially Mediated Civil War, January 13.
  53. Makhortykh, M. 2017. Remediating the Past: YouTube and Second World War Memory in Ukraine and Russia. Memory Studies, Online First, September 13.
  54. Mastropaolo, A. 2008. Politics Against Democracy: Party Withdrawal and Populist Breakthrough. In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnel, 30–48. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matar, D. 2012. Contextualising the Media and the Uprisings: A Return to History. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 5 (1): 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mazzoleni, G. 2003. The Media and the Growth of Neo-Populism in Contemporary Democracies. In The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis, ed. G. Mazzoleni, J. Stewart, and B. Horsfield, 1–20. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  57. Mazzoleni, G. 2008. Populism and the Media. In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnel, 49–66. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mazzoleni, G., J. Stewart, and B. Horsfield. 2003. The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  59. Moffitt, B. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moffitt, B. 2017. Transnational Populism? Representative Claims, Media and the Difficulty of Constructing a Transnational “People”. Javnost—The Public 24 (4): 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moffitt, B., and S. Tormey. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62 (2): 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. Jeremy Corbyn’s Left Populism. Verso, April 16.
  63. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mudde, C., and C.R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces. 2015. Fact Sheet: Mission of the Syrian Coalition.
  66. Nielsen, J. 2006. F-shaped Pattern for Reading Web Content (Original Study). Nielsen Norman Group, April 17.
  67. Papacharissi, Z. 2018. Comparative Media Studies for Today’s World. Keynote. Saint Petersburg State University, April 17–18.Google Scholar
  68. Pasquino, G. 2008. Populism and Democracy. In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnel, 15–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ponsford, D. 2017. Mail Online Hit New Traffic Record in January with 15.6 m Daily and 243 m Monthly Browsers. Press Gazette, February 16.
  70. Powers, S., and B. O’Loughlin. 2015. The Syrian Data Glut: Rethinking the Role of Information in Conflict. Media, War & Conflict 8 (2): 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rooduijn, M. 2014. The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator. Government and Opposition 49 (4): 573–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. RT. (n.d.). About RT. Accessed 21 Nov 2018.
  73. Seo, H., and H. Ebrahim. 2016. Visual Propaganda on Facebook: A Comparative Analysis of Syrian Conflicts. Media, War & Conflict 9 (3): 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shim, D. 2013. Visual Politics and North Korea: Seeing Is Believing. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Solomon, T. 2014. The Affective Underpinnings of Soft Power. European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 720–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stroembaeck, J. 2008. Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics. International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sweney, Mark. 2018. Russian Broadcaster RT Could Be Forced Off UK Airwaves. The Guardian, March 13.
  78. Taggart, Paul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Tipaldou, S., and P. Casula. 2018. ¿Justificaciones populistas de la guerra? La intervención rusa en el este de Ucrania (Populist Justifications of War? Insights from Russia’s Intervention in Eastern Ukraine). Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 119 (September).Google Scholar
  80. Tryhorn, C. 2013. BBC Is in a ‘Soft Power’ Battle with International Broadcasters. The Guardian Media Blog, November 13.
  81. Vaccari, C., and A. Valeriani. 2015. Follow the Leader! Direct and Indirect Flows of Political Communication During the 2013 Italian General Election Campaign. New Media & Society 17 (7): 1025–1042. Scholar
  82. Van Kessel, S., and R. Castelein. 2016. Shifting the Blame: Populist Politicians’ Use of Twitter as a Tool of Opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (2): 594–613.Google Scholar
  83. Weyland, K. 2001. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Williams, B.A., and M.X. Delli Carpini. 2011. After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Windren, Robert. 2017. Guess Who Came to Dinner with Flynn and Putin. NBC News, April 18.
  86. Yassin-Kassab, R., and L. Al-Shami. 2016. Burning Country: Syrians in Revolution and War. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations