Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuromonitoring and Emergency EEG

  • Chapter
Clinical Electroencephalography

  • 3230 Accesses

Abstract

Intraoperative and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) EEG monitoring is very useful in cases of possible brain damage, for example, during carotid endarterectomy, cardiac surgery and neurosurgery, or when subclinical seizures are suspected. Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring during surgery is a valid and sensitive instrument for recognizing and/or preventing perioperative ischemic insults or any epileptiform activity responsible for convulsive or nonconvulsive symptoms. Furthermore, it allows brain functions monitoring for anesthetic drug administration, to determine the depth of anesthesia and for adjusting drug levels to achieve a predefined neural effect, such as burst suppression.

In ICU, cEEG monitoring is essential to identify electrical discharges that occur frequently in critically ill patients and that are often clinically undetected, but potentially harmful if the diagnosis and the treatment are delayed. In the last years, cEEG monitoring has become a widespread practice, especially because of the use of new digital equipments, which are extremely compact and easy to use, not requiring a constant connection to the power grid and thus avoiding artifacts.

EEG tracings can be visualized in real-time or analyzed after acquisition, either online or offline, with qualitative and/or quantitative methods. Finally, it is worth remembering that EEGs can be recorded bedside from a peripheral recording unit and then sent to the central unit, so that neurophysiologists can examine the recordings from distance and process them without interfering with the patients’ management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Isley MR, Edmonds HL Jr, Stecker M. Guidelines for intraoperative neuromonitoring using raw (analog or digital waveforms) and quantitative electroencephalography: a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23:369–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shils JL, Sloan TB. Intraoperative neuromonitoring. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2015;53:53–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Putten MJAM, Hofmeijer J. EEG monitoring in cerebral ischemia: basic concepts and clinical applications. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33:203–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Osman GM, Riviello JJ. Hirsch LJ. EEG in the intensive care unit: anoxia, coma, brain death, and related disorders. In: Schomer DL, Lopes da Silva FH, editors. Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 610–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stecker MM, Cheung AT, Pochettino A, et al. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: I. Effects of cooling on electroencephalogram and evoked potentials. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:14–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thirumala PD, Thiagarajan K, Gedela S, Crammond DJ, Balzer JR. Diagnostic accuracy of EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy in predicting perioperative strokes. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballotta E, Saladini M, Gruppo M, et al. Predictors of electroencephalographic changes needing shunting during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24:1045–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon MV, Chiappa KH, Kilbride RD, et al. Predictors of clamp-induced electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomies. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29:462–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiappa KH, Burke SR, Young RR. Results of electroencephalographic monitoring during 367 carotid endarterectomies. Stroke. 1979;4:381–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mizrahi EM, Chatrain G-E, Byrum W, et al. American clinical guidelines on intraoperative electroencephalography. Am Clin Neurophysiol Soc Council. 2000;2000:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cursi M, Meraviglia MV, Fanelli GF, et al. Electroencephalographic background desynchronization during cerebral blood flow reduction. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2577–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Putten MJ, Peters JM, Mulder SM, et al. A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1189–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández Suárez FE, Fernández Del Valle D, González Alvarez A, Pérez-Lozano B. Intraoperative care for aortic surgery using circulatory arrest. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 6):S508–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogue CW, Palin CA, Arrowsmith JE. Cardiopulmonary bypass management and neurologic outcomes: an evidence-based appraisal of current practices. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:21–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kimura T, Muraoka R, Chiba Y, et al. Effect of intermittent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest on brain metabolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:658–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. James ML, Andersen ND, Swaminathan M, et al. Predictors of electrocerebral inactivity with deep hypothermia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1002–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Legatt AD, Nuwer MR, Emerson RG. Intraoperative monitoring of central neurophysiology. In: Schomer DL, Lopes da Silva FH, editors. Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalopgraphy: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 833–66.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Le Roux P, Menon D, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in Neurocritical care. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21:S282–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gütling E, Gonser A, Imhof HG, Landis T. EEG reactivity in the prognosis of severe head injury. Neurology. 1995;45:915–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsetsou S, Novy J, Oddo M, Rossetti AO. EEG reactivity to pain in comatose patients: importance of the stimulus type. Resuscitation. 2015;97:34–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch LJ, Claassen J, Mayer SA, Emerson RG. Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): a common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill. Epilepsia. 2004;45:109–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson EL, Kaplan PW, Ritzl EK. Stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs). J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;35:229–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hirsch LJ. Continuous EEG monitoring in intensive care unit: an overview. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21:332–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halford J. Electrographic seizures in adults: recognition and examples. In: Husain AM, Sinha SR, editors. Continuous EEG Monitoring. Principle and practice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jordan KG. Continuous EEG and evoked potential monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;10:445–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Privitera M, Hoffman M, Moore JL, Jester D. EEG detection of nontonic-clonic status epilepticus in patients with altered consciousness. Epilepsy Res. 1994;18:155–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. André-Obadia N, Parain D, Szurhaj W. Continuous EEG monitoring in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU). Neurophysiol Clin. 2015;45:39–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, Garnett LK, Brown AJ, Smith JR Jr, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology. 2000;54:340–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vespa PM, Nuwer MR, Juhasz C, Alexander M, Nenov V, Martin N, et al. Early detection of vasospasm after acute subarachnoid hemorrhage using continuous EEG ICU monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103:607–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Claassen J, Taccone FS, Horn P, Holtkamp M, Stocchetti N, Oddo M. Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1337–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Young GB, Jordan KG, Doig GS. An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology. 1996;47:83–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1698–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mani R, Schmitt SE, Mazer M, Putt ME, Gaieski DF. The frequency and timing of epileptiform activity on continuous electroencephalogram in comatose post-cardiac arrest syndrome patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2012;83:840–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Navarro V, Engrand N, Gélisse P. The electroencephalogram in status epilepticus. Rev Neurol. 2009;165:329–37.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kamenik M, Möller Petrun A. Bispectral index-guided induction of general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:169.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yigit O, Eray O, Mihci E, et al. The utility of EEG in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:301–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Varelas PN, Spanaki MV, Hacein-Bey L, Hether T, Terranova B. Emergent EEG: indications and diagnostic yield. Neurology. 2003;61:702–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Benbadis SR. Use and abuse of stat EEG. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8:865–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Quigg M, Shneker B, Domer P. Current practice in administration and clinical criteria of emergent EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;18:162–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. ACEP Clinical Policies Committee and the Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Seizures. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with seizures. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:605–25.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ziai WC, Schlattman D, Llinas R, et al. Emergent EEG in the emergency department in patients with altered mental states. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:910–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanich W, Brady WJ, Huff JS, et al. Altered mental status: evaluation and etiology in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:613–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with altered mental status. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:251–80.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kaplan PW. Assessing the outcomes in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: nonconvulsive status epilepticus is underdiagnosed, potentially overtreated and confounded by comorbidity. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;16:341–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shorvon S, Trinka E. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus and the postictal state. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;19:172–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Praline J, Grujic J, Corcia P, et al. Emergent EEG in clinical practice. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2149–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. de Falco FA, Sterzi R, Toso V, et al. The neurologist in the emergency department. An Italian nationwide epidemiological survey. Neurol Sci. 2008;29:67–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Patel M, Bagary M, McCorry D. The management of convulsive refractory status Epilepticus in adults in the UK: no consistency in practice and little access to continuous EEG monitoring. Seizure. 2015;24:33–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Marianna Brienza, Chiara Davassi & Oriano Mecarelli

  2. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy

    Patrizia Pulitano

Authors
  1. Marianna Brienza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiara Davassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrizia Pulitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oriano Mecarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oriano Mecarelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Oriano Mecarelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brienza, M., Davassi, C., Pulitano, P., Mecarelli, O. (2019). Neuromonitoring and Emergency EEG. In: Mecarelli, O. (eds) Clinical Electroencephalography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04573-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04573-9_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04572-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04573-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation