Advertisement

General Economic Equilibrium

  • Fiorenzo MornatiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (PHET)

Abstract

In Pareto’s view, studies on demand and supply were simply a preliminary to the study of general equilibrium which, insofar as it constituted a representation (even if only a first approximation) of economic phenomena, he considered to be the principal issue in economic theory. He thus contrasted Alfred Marshall, who “has not yet understood what general equilibrium is and, more specifically, does not grasp the mutual interdependence among economic phenomena” (Hence Marshall, adding “nothing of note to our stock of knowledge”, makes excessive use of mathematics, Pareto to Pantaleoni, 17th June 1895, see Pareto (Letters to Maffeo Pantaleoni 1890–1896 (Lettere a Maffeo Pantaleoni 1890–1896), Complete works, tome XXVIII.I, ed. Gabriele De Rosa. Geneva: Droz, 1984, pp. 417–418)), with Walras, whose equations represented a development of Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas (What is seen and what is not seen) by Frédéric Bastiat (Pareto to Pantaleoni, 9th July 1895, ibid., pp. 423–424. Here Pareto is alluding to Bastiat (Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas. Reprinted in Bastiat (1854, pp. 336–392), 1850).) and more specifically “they interpret the whole range of economic phenomena and … lend themselves to any amplification necessary in order to take every detail into account”. (Pareto to Pantaleoni, 9th July 1895, in Pareto, Letters to Pantaleoni, 1890–1896, p. 425.) In this regard, the major points will be briefly outlined below, from Pareto’s first characterisation of general equilibrium, displaying a certain number of additions in relation to Walras’ original (Sect. 4.1), to Pareto’s exposition of Walras’ version (Sects. 4.2 and 4.3) and to some of his comments relating to the consequences of the introduction of monopolies into the general equilibrium of free competition (Sect. 4.4).

Bibliography

  1. Bastiat, Frédéric. 1850. Ce qu’on voit et ce qu’on ne voit pas. Reprinted in Bastiat (1854, pp. 336–392).Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1854. Economic sophistry, Short pamphlets. II (Sophismes économiques, Petits pamphlets II), Complete Works, tome V. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
  3. Bridel, Pascal, and Fiorenzo Mornati. 2009. On general equilibrium as a “branch of metaphysics” (De l’équilibre général comme « branche de la métaphysique »). Revue économique LX-4: 869–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donzelli, Franco. 2006. Walras and Pareto on the meaning of the solution concept in general equilibrium theory. International Review of Economics LIII-4: 491–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Marchionatti, Roberto-Mornati, Fiorenzo. (2016). Economic theories in competition. A new interpretation of the debate on the general economic equilibrium theory in the 1930s. Panoeconomicus, LXIII-5: 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pareto, Vilfredo. 1892. Messrs. Auspitz and Lieben’s theory of prices and professor Walras’ observations (La teoria dei prezzi dei signori Auspitz e Lieben e le osservazioni del professor Walras). Giornale degli Economisti III, IV-3: 201–239.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1894. Mathematical theory of foreign exchange (Teoria matematica dei cambi forestieri). Giornale degli Economisti V, VIII-2: 142–173.Google Scholar
  8. ———.1895. Mathematical theory of foreign exchange (Théorie mathématique des changes étrangers) in Association Française pour l’Avancement des sciences (French Association for the Advancement of Science), Congrès de Caen (Caen Congress), Paris, Au Secrétariat of the Association. Reprinted in Pareto (1989, pp. 65–75).Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1896–1897. Course in political economy (Cours d’économie politique). Lausanne: Rouge.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1984. Letters to Maffeo Pantaleoni 1890–1896 (Lettere a Maffeo Pantaleoni 1890–1896), Complete works, tome XXVIII.I, ed. Gabriele De Rosa. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  11. ———.1989. Statistics and mathematical economics (Statistique et économie mathématique). Complete works, tome VIII. ed. Giovanni Busino, Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
  12. Weintraub, Eliot R. 1983. On the existence of a competitive equilibrium: 1930–1954. Journal of Economic Literature XXI-1: 1–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations