Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy pp 217–255Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Overcoming the Limitations of Traditional Diplomacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1839 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy ((GPD))

Abstract

This chapter examines diplomats’ use of digital technologies to overcome the limitations of traditional diplomacy. As this chapter demonstrates, foreign ministries have sought to employ digital technologies to annihilate time and space, transcend national borders, overcome hostile media landscapes and interact with the populations of enemy nations. Employing Bauman and Lyon’s prism of a society at a distance, this chapter explores the use of virtual embassies by the governments of Sweden, the USA, Israel and Palestine. The chapter also examines how diplomats create global social media campaigns that seek to render space meaningless by interacting with a global constituency. The chapter concludes by arguing that diplomats often fail to realize the potential of virtual embassies as diplomacy has traditionally relied on proximity for gathering information and fostering relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anholt, S., & Hildreth, J. (2005). Let freedom and cash registers ring: America as a brand. Place Branding,1(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, B. (2016). Remoteness distancing an automation. In Z. Bauman & B. Lyon (Eds.), Liquid surveillance (pp. 76–99). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjola, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Social media and public diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy theory and practice (pp. 71–88). Oxon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calamur, K., Vasilogambros, M., Weston Phippen, J., Graham, D. A., Yasmin, S., & Ford, M. (2016, July). What’s going on in Turkey? The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/07/turkey-government/491579/.

  • Callimachi, R. (2015, June). ISIS and the lonely young American. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/world/americas/isis-online-recruiting-american.html.

  • Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causey, C., & Howard, P. N. (2013). Delivering digital public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 144–156). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha, H., Yeo, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Social media’s dialogic communication of foreign embassies in Korea and public diplomacy: Based on dialogic communication theory. Advanced Science and Technology Letters,63, 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2015). Business as usual? An evolution of British and Canadian digital diplomacy as policy change. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy theory and practice (pp. 111–126). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, H. [US State Department]. (2011, December 12). Secretary Clinton announces virtual embassy Tehran [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c70SKkcvUIw.

  • Comor, E., & Bean, H. (2012). America’s ‘engagement’ delusion: Critiquing a public diplomacy consensus. International Communication Gazette,74(3), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, D. (2013). Taking diplomacy public: Science, technology and foreign ministries in a heteropolar world. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 56–69). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication,43(4), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, E. (2005a). The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication,22(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, E. (2005b). Global television news and foreign policy: Debating the CNN effect. International Studies Perspectives,6(3), 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B., & Melissen, J. (2015). Diplomacy in the digital age. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Digital diplomacy conference summary (pp. 6–19). Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/271028.pdf.

  • Jones, D. (2014). The Hollow Crown: The wars of the roses and the rise of the Tudors. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (2014, September). The State Department’s Twitter war with ISIS is embarrassing. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/3387065/isis-twitter-war-state-department/.

  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web (pp. 591–600). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengel, L., & Newsome, V. A. (2012). Framing messages of democracy through social media: Public diplomacy 2.0, gender, and the Middle East and North Africa. Global Media Journal,11(21), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann, O., & McKenzie, S. (2018, July). Israel helps evacuate Syria’s White Helmets to Jordan. CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/22/middleeast/israel-evacuation-syria-white-helmets-jordan-intl/index.html.

  • Lupton, D. (2014). A critical sociology of big data. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Digital sociology (pp. 93–116). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, E. (2018). Serving in Sweden in the days of Carl Bildt [In person].

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I. (2015, July 1). The US’s LGBT digital diplomacy blitz [Blog]. Retrieved from https://digdipblog.com/2015/07/01/the-uss-lgbt-digital-diplomacy-blitz/.

  • Manor, I. (2016). Are we there yet: Have MFA s realized the potential of digital diplomacy? Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy,1(2), 1–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I. (2017). America’s selfie–Three years later. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 13(4), 308–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I. (2018, June 1). The ebb and flow of digital diplomacy [Blog]. Retrieved from https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/ebb-and-flow-digital-diplomacy.

  • Manor, I., & Crilley, R. (2018a). Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I., & Crilley, R. (2018b). The aesthetics of violent extremist and counter violent extremist communication. In C. Bjola & J. Pamment (Eds.), Countering online propaganda and extremism: The dark side of digital diplomacy. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I. & Crilley, R. (2019). The mediatization of MFAs: diplomacy in the new media ecology. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, I., & Holmes, M. (2018, May–August). Palestine in Hebrew: Overcoming the limitations of traditional diplomacy. Revista Mexican de Politicia Exterior, 113, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, K. (2014). Public engagement in the Web 2.0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context. Canadian Public Administration,57(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzgar, E. T. (2012). Is it the medium or the message? Social media, American public diplomacy & Iran. Global Media Journal,12(21), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, B. D. (2012). Credibility talk in public diplomacy. Review of International Studies,38(2), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, C. (2018, January). Japan’s top social media networks for 2018. Humble Bunny. Retrieved from http://www.humblebunny.com/japans-top-social-media-networks-2018/.

  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters institute digital news report 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research. (2017). Palestinian-Israeli pulse. Retrieved from http://www.pcpsr.org/en/node/678.

  • Pamment, J. (2013). New public diplomacy in the 21st century: A comparative study of policy and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2014). The mediatization of diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy,9(3), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2009). Can brand Obama rescue brand America? The Brown Journal of World Affairs,16(1), 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, B. (2013, July). Israel open a ‘Virtual Embassy’ to Gulf States. Haaretz. Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-israel-opens-gulf-virtual-embassy-1.5297843.

  • Rawson, E. A. G. (2007). Perceptions of the United States of America: Exploring the political brand of a nation. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy,3(3), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (2017). Diplomacy—A short history from pre-classical origins to the fall of the Berlin Wall. In I. Roberts (Ed.), Satow’s diplomatic practice (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (1999). The CNN effect: Can the news media drive foreign policy? Review of International Studies,25(2), 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said-Moorhouse, L. (2016, August). This is how many people Turkey has arrested since the failed coup. CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/29/europe/turkey-post-coup-arrest-numbers/index.html.

  • Seib, P. (2012). Real-time diplomacy: Politics and power in the social media era. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, H. (2013). The “Virtual Last Three Feet”: Understanding relationship perspectives in network-based public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 157–169). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, S., & Hill, S. (2002). Marketing: Selling brand America. Journal of Business Strategy,23(4), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiriu, S. (2015). Digital diplomacy: Between promises and reality. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy theory and practice (pp. 33–51). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spry, D. (2018). Facebook diplomacy: a data-driven, user-focused approach to Facebook use by diplomatic missions. Media International Australia, 168(1), 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styles, D., & Allmand, C. T. (1982, May). The coronations of Henry-VI. History Today,32, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research,26(5), 384–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research. (2018). Palestinian-Israeli pulse: A joint poll. Retrieved from http://www.ps.undp.org/content/dam/papp/docs/Publications/UNDP-papp-research-PSR-%20summaryreport.pdf.

  • TOI Staff. (2015, November). PLO launches Facebook page—In Hebrew. The Times of Israel. Retrieved from https://www.timesofisrael.com/plo-launches-facebook-page-in-hebrew/.

  • Van Ham, P. (2013). Social power in public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 17–28). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Development, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Ilan Manor

Authors
  1. Ilan Manor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilan Manor .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manor, I. (2019). Overcoming the Limitations of Traditional Diplomacy. In: The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04405-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation