Advertisement

Caribbean Political Culture, Governance, and Participation

  • Kristina HindsEmail author
Chapter
  • 88 Downloads
Part of the Non-Governmental Public Action book series (NGPA)

Abstract

This chapter considers the contradictory existence of authoritarian and democratic tendencies in Caribbean political culture. The discussion here provides insights into the ways in which colonial legacies including ethnic, racial, and class divisions; the adoption of colonial governance and electoral systems; and the practices of patron-client relationships, have coloured governance in the region. This chapter considers governance in the region in the light of narratives about good governance and collaborative/participatory governance, while also assessing some of the affinities between Caribbean governance practices and neo-corporatism. In the end, chapter proffers that although authoritarian tendencies continue to trouble the region, ongoing efforts to enhance democracy in the region can be bolstered by creating spaces for participatory governance practices.

Keywords

Caribbean Political culture Collaborative governance Participatory governance Democracy Authoritarian Neo-corporatism 

References

  1. Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrow-Giles, Cynthia, and Tennyson S. D. Joseph. 2006. General Elections and Voting in the English-Speaking Caribbean: 1992–2005. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Capano, Giliberto, Michael Howlett, and M. Ramesh. 2015. “Bringing Governments Back In: Governance and Governing in Comparative Policy Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (4): 311–321.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1031977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crouch, Colin. 2006. “Neo-Corporatism and Democracy.” In The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck, 46–70. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. D’Agostino, Thomas J. 2003. “Caribbean Politics.” In Understanding the Contemporary Caribbean, edited by Richard S. Hillman and Thomas J D’Agostino, 85–129. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, Kirk, Tina Nabatchi, and Stephen Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emmanuel, Patrick A. M. 1992. Elections and Party Systems in the Commonwealth Caribbean 1944–1991. Bridgetown: Caribbean Development Research Services.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, Mark. 2012. “Beyond the Integrity Paradox—Towards ‘Good Enough’ Governance?” Policy Studies 33 (1): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grenade, Wendy. 2013. “Party Politics and Governance in Grenada: An Analysis of the New National Party (1984–2012).” The Round Table 102 (2): 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grindle, Merilee S. 2004. “Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17 (4): 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2007. “Good Enough Governance Revisited.” Development Policy Review (25) 5: 553–574.Google Scholar
  12. Grugel, Jean. 1995. Politics and Development in the Caribbean Basin: Central America and the Caribbean in the New World Order. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hinds Harrison, Kristina, and Annita Montoute. 2018. “Global Forces and the Continued Role of Caribbean Trade Unions as Political Actors?” In Caribbean Realities and Endogenous Sustainability, edited by Nikolaos Karagiannis and Debbie A. Mohammed, 266–288. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hinds, David. 2008. “Beyond Formal Democracy: The Discourse on Democracy and Governance in the Anglophone Caribbean.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 46 (3): 388–406.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040802176558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ILO. 2018. “Governance and Tripartism Division.” Geneva: International Labour Office. Accessed Jule 30, 2018. http://www.ilo.org/ifpdial/lang--en/index.htm.
  16. Kamugisha, Aaron, ed. 2013. Caribbean Political Thought: Theories of the Post-colonial State. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Keman, Hans, and Paul Pennings. 1995. “Managing Political and Societal Conflict in Democracies: Do Consensus and Corporatism Matter.” British Journal of Political Science 25 (2): 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kooiman, Jan, Maarten Bavinck, Ratana Chuenpagdee, Robin Mahon, and Roger Pullin. 2008. “Interactive Governance and Governability: An Introduction.” The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 7 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  21. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2003. “Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict, and the New Corporatism.” Verhandlungsdemokratie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 59–63. Google Scholar
  22. Lijphart, Arend, and Crepaz M. L. Marcus. 1991. “Corporatism and Consensus Democracy in Eighteen Countries: Conceptual and Empirical Linkages.” British Journal of Political Science 21 (2): 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macridis, Roy C. 1961. “Interest Groups in Comparative Analysis.” The Journal of Politics, 23 (1): 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall, Don D. 1998. Caribbean Political Economy at the Crossroads: NAFTA and Regional Developmentalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Osborne, Stephen P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pagden, Anthony. 1998. “The Genesis of ‘Governance’ and Enlightenment Conceptions of the Cosmopolitan World Order.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stone, Carl. 2013. “Clientelism, Populism and Democracy.” Edited by Aaron Kamugisha, 67–82. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Thomas, Clive S. 1993. “Understanding and Comparing Interest Groups in Western Democracies.” In First World Interest Groups: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Clive S. Thomas, 1–26. London and Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  29. Torfing, Jacob, and Peter Triantafillou. 2013. “What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political Administrative System.” International Review of Public Administration 18 (2): 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waheduzzaman, and Charles H. B. Mphande. 2014. “Gaps in Pursuing Participatory Good Governance Bangladesh Context.” Administration and Society 47 (1): 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wampler, Brian. 2012. “Participation, Representation and Social Justice: Using Participatory Governance to Transform Representative Democracy.” Polity 44 (4): 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiss, Thomas G. 2000. “Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges.” Third World Quarterly 21 (5): 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Willetts, Peter. 2002. “What Is a Non-Governmental Organization? (Article 1.44.3.7: Non-Governmental Organizations).” UNESCO Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems (Section 1 Institutional and Infrastructure Resource Issues). Accessed June 1, 2018. http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM#Part1.
  34. Williamson, Peter J. 1985. Varieties of Corporatism: Theories and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, Graham K. 1990. Interest Groups. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West IndiesBridgetownBarbados

Personalised recommendations