Advertisement

Male Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: A Challenge to the Gendered Paradigm

  • Deborah PowneyEmail author
  • Nicola Graham-Kevan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will explore the received wisdom that men are the only perpetrators and women the only victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) often called ‘domestic violence’. The development of the gendered paradigm is explored, and research evidence is assessed which indicates a clear gender symmetry, and male victims of female perpetrated IPV. The validity of the Duluth model is challenged, and compared to Women’s Aid and Respect.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Domestic violence Duluth Male victim Feminism 

References

  1. Anderson, K. M., Renner, L. M., & Danis, F. S. (2012). Recovery: Resilience and growth in the aftermath of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 18(11), 1279–1299.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, C. F. (2008). Domestic violence against men. Nursing Standard (through 2013), 22(51), 35.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, E. A. (2016). Current controversies within intimate partner violence: Overlooking bidirectional violence. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 937–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, E. A., Archer, J., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2017a). Do the same risk and protective factors influence aggression toward partners and same-sex others? Aggressive Behavior, 43(2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates, E. A., Graham‐Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2014). Testing predictions from the male control theory of men’s partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, 40(1), 42–55.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, E. A., Graham-Kevan, N., Bolam, L. T., & Thornton, A. (2017b). A review of domestic violence perpetrator programs in the United Kingdom. Partner Abuse, 8(1), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2008). Intimate partner violence theoretical considerations: Moving towards a contextual framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1096–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, M. (2016). Male victims of domestic and partner abuse—30 key facts. Retrieved from https://www.mankind.org.uk/.
  10. Caldwell, J. E., Swan, S. C., & Woodbrown, V. D. (2012). Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. Psychology of Violence, 2(1), 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359(9314), 1331–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08336-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: Insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence and Victims, 14(3), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, R., & Raja, S. (2005). The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(1), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canady, B. E., & Babcock, J. C. (2009). The protective functions of social support and coping for women experiencing intimate partner abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(5), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carney, M., Buttell, F., & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cobb, A. R., Tedeschi, R. G., Calhoun, L. G., & Cann, A. (2006). Correlates of posttraumatic growth in survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 19(6), 895–903.Google Scholar
  17. Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., et al. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coker, A. L., Weston, R., Creson, D. L., Justice, B., & Blakeney, P. (2005). PTSD symptoms among men and women survivors of intimate partner violence: The role of risk and protective factors. Violence and Victims, 20(6), 625–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook, P. W. (1997). Abused men (1. publ. ed.). Westport, CT [u.a.]: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Dearwater, S. R., Coben, J. H., Campbell, J. C., Nah, G., Glass, N., McLoughlin, E., et al. (1998). Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. Jama, 280(5), 433–438.Google Scholar
  21. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Dragiewicz, M. (2007). Understanding the complexities of feminist perspectives on woman abuse. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 874–884.Google Scholar
  22. Dixon, L., Archer, J., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2012). Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: Are they based on ideology or evidence? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(2), 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dixon, L., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2011). Understanding the nature and etiology of intimate partner violence and implications for practice and policy. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(7), 1145–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence against wives. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  25. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, E. R. (2004). Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships working on a puzzle. The British Journal of Criminology, 44(3), 324–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A. (2011). The helpseeking experiences of men who sustain intimate partner violence: An overlooked population and implications for practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drijber, B., Reijnders, U., & Ceelen, M. (2013). Male victims of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 28(2), 173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9482-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dutton, D. G. (2012). The case against the role of gender in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 99–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. N. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dutton, D. G., & Corvo, K. (2007). The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(6), 658–667.Google Scholar
  32. Dutton, D. G., Corvo, K. N., & Hamel, J. (2009). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and practice: Part II—The information website of the American Bar Association. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(1), 30–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(6), 680–714.Google Scholar
  34. Dutton, D. G., & White, K. R. (2013). Male victims of domestic violence. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 2(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  35. Eadie, T., & Knight, C. (2002). Domestic violence programmes: Reflections on the shift from independent to statutory provision. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(2), 167–181.Google Scholar
  36. Elmquist, J., Hamel, J., Shorey, R. C., Labrecque, L., Ninnemann, A., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). Motivations for intimate partner violence in men and women arrested for domestic violence and court referred to batterer intervention programs. Partner Abuse, 5(4), 359.Google Scholar
  37. Felson, R. B. (1996). Big people hit little people: Sex differences in physical power and interpersonal violence. Criminology, 34(3), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Felson, R. B., & Lane, K. J. (2010). Does violence involving women and intimate partners have a special etiology? Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 48(1), 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Felson, R. B., Savolainen, J., Hughes, L. A., & Ellonen, N. (2015). Gender, provocation, and intimate partner aggression. Partner Abuse, 6(2), 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fiebert, M. (2012). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 18(2), 405–467.Google Scholar
  41. Gambrill, E. (2010). Evidence-informed practice: Antidote to propaganda in the helping professions? Research on Social Work Practice, 20(3), 302–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. New York [u.a]: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  43. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1992). Physical violence in American families (2. printing ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  44. George, M. J. (2016). Riding the donkey backwards: Men as the unacceptable victims of marital violence. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 3(2), 137–159.Google Scholar
  45. Golding, J. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gondolf, E. W. (2007). Theoretical and research support for the Duluth Model: A reply to dutton and corvo. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(6), 644–657.Google Scholar
  47. Goodman, L. A., Koss, M. P., & Felipe Russo, N. (1993). Violence against women: Physical and mental health effects, part I: Research findings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2(2), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Graham-Kevan, N. (2007). Domestic violence: Research and implications for batterer programmes in Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Graham-Kevan, N. (2011, June 7). The invisible domestic violence against men. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jun/07/feminism-domestic-violence-men.
  50. Graham-Kevan, N. (2017). The gendered perspective of domestic (intimate partner) violence: A review of the evidence. Euromind, EU Parliment.Google Scholar
  51. Hester, M. (2013). Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology, 10(5), 623–637.Google Scholar
  52. Hines, D. A., Brown, J., & Dunning, E. (2007). Characteristics of callers to the domestic abuse helpline for men. Journal of Family Violence, 22(2), 63–72.Google Scholar
  53. Hines, D. A., & Douglas, E. M. (2010). A closer look at men who sustain intimate terrorism by women. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 286–313.Google Scholar
  54. Home Office. (2016). Violence against women and girls service: Supporting local commissioning. London.Google Scholar
  55. Jose, R., & Novaco, R. W. (2016). Intimate partner violence victims seeking a temporary restraining order: Social support and resilience attenuating psychological distress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(20), 3352–3376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuijpers, K. F., van der Knaap, L. M., & Winkel, F. W. (2012). Risk of revictimization of intimate partner violence: The role of attachment, anger and violent behavior of the victim. Journal of Family Violence, 27(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., & McCullars, A. (2012). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 1–33.Google Scholar
  58. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. (2012). Unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199–230(32).Google Scholar
  59. Lawrence, E. Orengo-Aguayo, R., Langer, L., & Brock, B. (2012). The impact and consequences of partner abuse on partners. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 406–428.Google Scholar
  60. Mechem, C. C., Shofer, F. S., Reinhard, S. S., Hornig, S., & Datner, E. (1999). History of domestic violence among male patients presenting to an urban emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6(8), 786–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Men’s Aid UK. (2017). CAFCASS and WA—A reply to their paper on domestic abuse in family court proceedings. Retrieved from http://mensaid.co.uk/media.html.
  62. Ministry of Justice. (2014). Women and the criminal justice system 2013. London.Google Scholar
  63. Ministry of Justice. (2015). Statistics on women and the criminal justice system 2015: A Ministry of Justice publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/572043/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-statistics-2015.pdf.
  64. Office of National Statistics. (2016). Domestic abuse in England and Wales: Year ending March 2016. London.Google Scholar
  65. Office of National Statistics. (2017). Domestic abuse in England and Wales: Year ending March 2017. London.Google Scholar
  66. O’leary, K. D., Smith Slep, A. M., & O’leary, S. G. (2007). Multivariate models of men’s and women’s partner aggression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 752.Google Scholar
  67. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Respect. (2017). The respect standard, (3rd ed.). UK: Respect.Google Scholar
  69. Roberts, A., Sharman, S., Coid, J., Murphy, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Cowlishaw, S., et al. (2017). Gambling and negative life events in a nationally representative sample of UK men. Addictive Behaviors, 75, 95–102.Google Scholar
  70. Shaughnessy, N. O. (1996). Social propaganda and social marketing: A critical difference? European Journal of Marketing, 30(10), 62.Google Scholar
  71. Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Steinmetz, S. K. (1977). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2(3), 499.Google Scholar
  73. Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1989). The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Journal of Family Violence, 4(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stets, J. E., & Straus, M. A. (1992). Gender difference in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families (pp. 151–165). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  75. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(1), 75.Google Scholar
  76. Straus, M. A. (2009a). Gender symmetry in partner violence: Evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. In Preventing partner violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp. 245–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  77. Straus, M. A. (2009b). Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence by women has not been perceived and is often denied. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(6), 552–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Straus, M. A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332–362.Google Scholar
  79. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1999). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  80. Straus, M. A., & Ramirez, I. L. (2007). Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in Mexico and USA. Aggressive Behavior, 33(4), 281–290.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors. Garden City, NY: Anchor Pr.Google Scholar
  82. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1988). Behind closed doors. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Swan, S. C., Gambone, L. J., Caldwell, J. E., Sullivan, T. P., & Snow, D. L. (2008). A review of research on women’s use of violence with male intimate partners. Violence and Victims, 23(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the national violence against women survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Walker, L. E. (1980). The battered woman. New York [u.a.]: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  86. Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Preventing partner violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whitaker, D. J., Haileyesus, T., Swahn, M., & Saltzman, L. S. (2007). Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 941–947.Google Scholar
  88. What is domestic abuse?—Womens Aid. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.womensaid.org.uk/information-support/what-is-domestic-abuse/.
  89. World Health Organization. Department of Injuries and Violence Prevention. (2005). Violence prevention alliance: Building global commitment for violence prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  90. Zacarias, A. E. (2012). Women as victims and perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) in Maputo city, Mozambique: Occurence, nature and effects. Inst för folkhälsovetenskap/Dept of Public Health Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations