Positive Masculinity: Including Masculinity as a Valued Aspect of Humanity

  • Martin Seager
  • John A. BarryEmail author


Much of the contemporary narrative around masculinity in the Western world is deeply negative, and promotes the assumption that masculinity is a social problem that needs fixing. In this chapter the validity of this narrative is questioned, tested and counter-balanced by exploring a wider range of theory and evidence. It is concluded that there is a more urgent need to fix our negative social attitudes to masculinity than to fix masculinity itself. Masculinity cannot empirically be reduced to a social construction. Gender is a universal and embodied part of the human condition, not merely a stereotype or construct. At a time when we thankfully no longer try to change or reconstruct a person’s sexuality, the same attitude should be taken to a person’s masculinity or femininity. It is bad science to confuse gender itself with pathology and this chapter offers a more evidence-based, positive and normative approach to masculinity as a valuable part of the human condition.


Positive masculinity Hegemonic masculinity Toxic masculinity Hypermasculinity Archetype 


  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin (American Psychological Association), 126(5), 651–680.Google Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248–254.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, J. A. (2016). Review of the mask you live in. Male Psychology Network blog, Aug 26th 2016. Retrieved from
  4. Barry, J. A. (2018). The Harry’s Masculinity Report USA. Available on the world wide web
  5. British Psychological Society. (2017). Psychologists back call for end to conversion therapy. Retrieved from
  6. Brown, B. (2019). From hegemonic to responsive masculinity: The transformative power of the provider role. In J. Barry, R. Kingerlee, M. Seager, & L. Sullivan (Eds.). The palgrave handbook of male psychology and mental health. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Brizendine, L. (2010). The Male Brain: A breakthrough understanding of how men and boys think. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cambridge Union. (2016). Debate: This house believes masculinity is harmful to everyone. Retrieved from
  9. Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Palo Alta: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corvo, K., Dutton, D., & Chen, W. Y. (2009). Do Duluth Model interventions with perpetrators of domestic violence violate mental health professional ethics? Ethics and Behavior, 19(4), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell, W., & Gray, J. (2018). The boy crisis—Why our boys are struggling and what we can do about it. Dallas: Benbella Books.Google Scholar
  12. Fiebert, M. (2010). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 14(1), 49–91. Updated June 2012. Retrieved from
  13. Guardian Newspaper. (2017a). University gender gap at record high as 30,000 more women. Retrieved from
  14. Guardian Newspaper. (2017b). Finland: The only country where fathers spend more time with kids than mothers. Retrieved from
  15. Haider, S. (2016). The shooting in Orlando, terrorism or toxic masculinity (or both?). Men and Masculinities, 19(5), 555–565.Google Scholar
  16. Health & Safety Executive, Annual Statistics, published July 2018 (data up to March 2018). Workplace fatal injuries in Great Britain 2018. Retrieved from
  17. Hill, S., Proffitt Leyva, R., & Delpriore, D. (2016). Absent fathers and sexual strategies. The Psychologist, 29, 436–439.Google Scholar
  18. Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, R. (2005). The sociology and psychology of terrorism: Who becomes a terrorist and why? Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
  20. Johnstone, L., Boyle, M., Cromby, J., Dillon J., Harper D., Kinderman, P., et al. (2018). The power threat meaning framework: Towards the identification of patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubled or troubling behaviour, as an alternative to functional psychiatric diagnosis. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
  21. Kimmell, M. (2018). Healing from hate: How young men get into—and out of—violent extremism. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kiselica, M. S., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Identifying, affirming, and building upon male strengths: The positive psychology/positive masculinity model of psychotherapy with boys and men. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(3), 276.Google Scholar
  23. Krumm, S., Checchia, C., Koesters., M., Kilian, R., & Becker, T. (2017). Men’s views on depression: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Psychopathology, 50(2), 107–124. Available online
  24. Levenson, J. S., Willis, G. M., & Prescott, D. S. (2016). Adverse childhood experiences in the lives of male sex offenders: Implications for trauma-informed care. Sexual Abuse, 28(4), 340–359.Google Scholar
  25. Marcum, C., Higgins, G., Freiburger, T., & Ricketts, M. (2012). Battle of the sexes: An examination of male and female cyberbullying. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 904–911. Google Scholar
  26. Morison, L., Trigeorgis, C., & John, M. (2014). Are mental health services inherently feminised? The Psychologist, 27(6), 414–416.Google Scholar
  27. Mosher, D., & Serkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18(2), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy, N. (2018). Embracing vulnerability in the midst of danger: Therapy in a high secure prison. Existential Analysis, 29(2), 174–188.Google Scholar
  29. OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality. Retrieved from
  30. Parker, K., & Wang, W. (2013). Modern parenthood: Roles of moms and dads converge as they balance work and family. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Available at
  31. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model (p. xiii). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494.Google Scholar
  33. Salkovskis, P., & Sutcliffe, I. (2018). Power threat meaning framework: Innovative and important? Retrieved from
  34. Schmitt, D. P. (2015). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are… it appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Seager, M., Sullivan, L., & Barry, J. (2014). Gender-related schemas and suicidality: Validation of the male and female traditional gender scripts questionnaires. New Male Studies, 3(3), 34–54.Google Scholar
  36. Seager, M., Farrell, W., & Barry, J. (2016). The male gender empathy gap: Time for psychology to take action. New Male Studies, 5(2), 6–16. Google Scholar
  37. Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment (Vol. 160, pp. 168–266). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sell, A., Hone, L., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23(1), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharma, N., & Sharma, K. (2015). Self-fulfilling prophecy: A literature review. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies (IJIMS), 2(3), 41–42.
  40. Starr, S. B. (2012). Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases (University of Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper, No. 12-018).Google Scholar
  41. Stemple, L., Flores, A., & Meyer, I. (2017). Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2019). A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality. PLoS One, 14(1), e0205349. Scholar
  43. Todd, B. K., Fischer, R. A., Di Costa, S., Roestorf, A., Harbour, K., Hardiman, P., & Barry, J. A. (2018). Sex differences in children’s toy preferences: A systematic review, meta‐regression, and meta‐analysis. Infant and Child Development, 27(2), e2064.Google Scholar
  44. Wolf, J., Williams, E. N., Darby, M., Herald, J., & Schultz, C. (2018). Just for women? Feminist multicultural therapy with male clients. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 439–450.Google Scholar
  45. Yousaf, O., Popat, A., & Hunter, M. S. (2015). An investigation of masculinity attitudes, gender, and attitudes toward psychological help-seeking. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16, 234–237. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Change, Grow, LiveDagenham/SouthendUK
  2. 2.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations