Abstract
A common skepticism about educational games is that learning and play are frequently not well integrated—the skill or content to be used and learned lacks a semantic or meaningful relation with the fantasy and challenge elements and can be easily swapped without influencing gameplay. In this chapter, we describe and analyze design challenges associated with the core components of gameplay—game mechanics and the narrative scheme as it relates to learning—and review the gameplay design propositions and infield test findings of E-Rebuild. Via a retrospective investigation of design features and strategies in terms of learnability and playability (i.e., capability of activating knowledge-based cognitive performance without interrupting gameplay), this chapter aims to report and discuss how domain-specific learning is integrated in, and activated by, core game actions, rules, game objects, and the game world design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All participants’ names cited in this paper are pseudonyms.
References
Ang, C. S. (2006). Rules, gameplay, and narratives in video games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(3), 306–325.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.
Frasca, Gonzalo (1999). Ludology meets narratology: similitude and differences between (video) games and narrative. Retrieved from http://www.ludology.org/articles/ludology.htm
Ge, X., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Designing engaging educational games and assessing engagement in game-based learning. In R. Zheng & M. K. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications (pp. 255–272). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206.
Hamlen, K. R. (2012). Academic dishonesty and video game play: Is new media use changing conceptions of cheating? Computers & Education, 59(4), 1145–1152.
Järvinen, A. (2008). Games without Frontiers: Theories and Methods for Game Studies and Design. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2002). Game design as narrative architecture. In P. Harrington & N. Frup-Waldrop (Eds.), First person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Retrieved from: http://www.anabiosispress.org/VM606/1stPerson_hjenkins.pdf
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. New York: Routledge.
Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.
Ke, F., Xie, K., & Xie, Y. (2016). Game-based learning engagement: A theory-and data-driven exploration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1183–1201.
Ke, F., Xu, X., Lee, S., Moon, J., Dai, Z., Pan, Y., Shute, V., Clark, K., & Erlebacher, G. (presented 2017, April). Math learning through game-based architectural design and building. Presentation at 2017 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities, & openness. Boston: The Education Arcade Retrieved from http://education.mit.edu/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdf
Lindley, C. A., & Sennersten, C. C. (2008). Game play schemas: From player analysis to adaptive game mechanics, 216784. International Journal of Computer Games Technology Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/216784
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, 3(1987), 223–253.
Miller, C. S., Lehman, J. F., & Koedinger, K. R. (1999). Goals and learning in microworlds. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 305–336.
Richards, J., Stebbins, L., & Moellering, K. (2013). In J. Richards, L. Stebbins, & K. Moellering (Eds.), Games for a digital age: K-12 market map and investment analysis. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Schell, J. (2014). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 89(4), 361–380.
Sicart, M. (2008). Defining game mechanics. Game Studies, 8(2), 1–14.
Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Progress report of the APEC project: collaborative studies on innovations for teaching and learning mathematics in different cultures (II)—Lesson study focusing on mathematical thinking.
Suits, B. H. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto, ON/Buffalo, NY: University of Tronto Press.
Taylor, A. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design for learning environments. Albuquerque, NM: UNM Press.
Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2015). Describing and studying domain-specific serious games. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ke, F., Shute, V., Clark, K.M., Erlebacher, G. (2019). Design of Gameplay for Learning. In: Interdisciplinary Design of Game-based Learning Platforms. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04339-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04338-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04339-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)