Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enablers of an Electricity System Transition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018 (KES-SEB 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 131))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

This research reveals a plausible future generation profile for the electricity network in southern Western Australia and seeks to understand the enablers and blockers to maintaining a stable electricity supply during a transition to that generation profile through to the late 2020’s. Transition theory is used as the theoretical framework for understanding the challenges for this transition and is supported by a series of semi-structured interviews with industry executives. The future profile will see the retirement of a significant proportion of synchronous coal fired generation, replacement with an equivalent capacity of solar and wind generation and at least as much distributed rooftop solar PV generation. Mid-day solar PV output will dominate the consumed energy and diminish network demand to levels that are expected to threaten the profitability of much of the existing baseload generators. Rooftop solar PV has limited visibility to and uncontrollable by the system control center, which under current market settings will struggle to maintain system frequency under the future generation profile. Wholesale market reforms will be required to maintain energy security, including to; tariff structures; ancillary services markets; connection codes; public generator bidding and ownership structures; and the role of consumers in the future market. These reforms are heavily confounded by the adversarial political system; legacy decisions around uniform tariffs; incumbency; and uncertainty over the willingness of society to accept third party control of their personal loads, solar PV output or battery services. The key to the transition will be creating the social and political space within which reforms can be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AEMO, AEMO Observations Operational and Market Challenges to Reliability and Security in the NEM. Australian Energy Market Operator (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tayal, D.: Disruptive forces on the electricity industry: a changing landscape for utilities. Electr. J. 29(7), 13–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggar, D., Reeves, A.: Network pricing for the prosumer future: demand-based tariffs or locational marginal pricing? In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Future of Utilities of the Future How Technological Innovations in Distributed Energy Resources Will Reshape the Electric Power Sector, pp. 247–265 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakke, G.: The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future, p. 351. Bloomsbury, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sioshansi, F.P.: What is the future of the electric power sector? In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Future of Utilities Utilities of the Future How Technological Innovations in Distributed Energy Resources Will Reshape the Electric Power Sector, pp. 1–21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson, T., McNeill, J.: Role of utility and pricing in the transition. In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Future of Utilities Utilities of the Future How Technological Innovations in Distributed Energy Resources Will Reshape the Electric Power Sector, pp. 109–128 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlstrom, M., et al.: The evolution of the market: designing a market for high levels of variable generation. IEEE Power Energ. Mag. 13(6), 60–66 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riesz, J., Gilmore, J., MacGill, I.: Frequency control ancillary service market design: insights from the Australian national electricity market. Electr. J. 28(3), 86–99 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riesz, J., Macgill, I.: Frequency Control Ancillary Services: Is Australia a Model Market for Renewable Integration? (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Riesz, J., Milligan, M.: Designing electricity markets for a high penetration of variable renewables. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Energy Environ. 4(3), 279–289 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riesz, J., Vithayasrichareon, P., Macgill, I.: 100% Renewables in Australia: A Research Summary. Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets University of NSW (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tayal, D., Rauland, V.: Future business models for Western Australian electricity utilities. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 19, 59–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meadowcroft, J.: What about the politics? sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci. 42(4), 323–340 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meadowcroft, J.: Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 1(1), 70–75 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, F.G.N., Pye, S.: Uncertainty, politics, and technology: expert perceptions on energy transitions in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 122–132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geels, F.W., Tyfield, D., Urry, J.: Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult. Soc. 31(5), 21–40 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuzemko, C., et al.: Governing for sustainable energy system change: politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 12, 96–105 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawhon, M., Murphy, J.T.: Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36(3), 354–378 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenbloom, D., Haley, B., Meadowcroft, J.: Critical choices and the politics of decarbonization pathways: exploring branching points surrounding low-carbon transitions in Canadian electricity systems. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 22–36 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Biggs, C.: A resource-based view of opportunities to transform Australia’s electricity sector. J. Clean. Prod. 123, 203–217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Green, J., Newman, P.: Citizen utilities: the emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy 105, 283–293 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kivimaa, P., Kern, F.: Creative destruction or mere niche support? innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 45(1), 205–217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geels, F.W.: From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res. Policy 33(6–7), 897–920 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geels, F.W.: Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res. Policy 39(4), 495–510 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Geels, F.W., Schot, J.: Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 36(3), 399–417 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verbong, G., Geels, F.: The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35(2), 1025–1037 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verbong, G.P.J., Geels, F.W.: Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 77(8), 1214–1221 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kern, F.: Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 79(2), 298–310 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shackley, S., Green, K.: A conceptual framework for exploring transitions to decarbonised energy systems in the United Kingdom. Energy 32(3), 221–236 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., Grin, J.: Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Res. Policy 39(4), 435–448 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. AEMO, 2017 Electricity Statement of Opportunities for the Wholesale Electricity Market. Australian Energy Market Operator (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. AEMO. Facilities (2018). http://data.wa.aemo.com.au/#facilities

  33. Australian PV Institute. PV Postcode Data (2018). http://pv-map.apvi.org.au/postcode. Accessed 27 Mar 2018

  34. Booth, R.R.: Warring tribes: the story of power development in Australia. Rev. ed. ed. Bardak Group, Doonan, Qld (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Government of Western Australia, State Budget 2018–19 Budget Paper 3: Economic and Fiscal Outlook. Government of Western Australia: Legislative Assembly (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Energy Networks Australia and CSIRO, Electricity Network Transformation Roadmap: Final report (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. CIGRÉ, The Future of Reliability: Definitions of reliability in light of new developments in various devices and services which offer customers and system operators new levels of flexibility. CIGRÉ, p. 78 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Holttinen, H., et al.: Ancillary services: technical specifications, system needs and costs. Deliverable D 2, 2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ernst and Young, Report to the Independent Market Operator: 2014 Ancillary Service Standards and Requirements Study (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Riesz, J., Vithayasrichareon, P., MacGill, I.: Assessing “gas transition” pathways to low carbon electricity - an Australian case study. Appl. Energy 154, 794–804 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Smith, R., MacGill, I.: The future of utility customers and the utility customer of the future. In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Future of Utilities Utilities of the Future How Technological Innovations in Distributed Energy Resources Will Reshape the Electric Power Sector, pp. 343–362 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jones, K.B., et al.: Distributed utility: conflicts and opportunities between incumbent utilities, suppliers, and emerging new entrants. In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Future of Utilities Utilities of the Future How Technological Innovations in Distributed Energy Resources Will Reshape the Electric Power Sector, pp. 399–415 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. McHenry, M.P.: Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: Technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks. Energy Policy 59, 834–842 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), Smart Grid Vision and Routemap, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Auverlot, D., et al.: The crisis of the european electricity system—diagnosis and possible ways forward. Policy Planning Commission of France (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ela, E., et al.: Evolution of wholesale electricity market design with increasing levels of renewable generation. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  47. AEMO, AEMO submission to Finkel Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market. Australian Energy Market Operator (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. ERA, 2016–17 Wholesale Electricity Market Final report to the Minister for Energy, Economic Regulatory Authority (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wilkinson, S., Morrison, G.M.: De-alignment and Re-alignment of a Regional Electricity System. Submitted, not yet published, In Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, School of Design and Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia

    Sam Wilkinson & Gregory M. Morrison

Authors
  1. Sam Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory M. Morrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Wilkinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Griffith Sciences, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Prasad Kaparaju

  2. Bournemouth University and KES International, Shoreham-by-sea, UK

    Robert J. Howlett

  3. Cardiff School of Art & Design, Llandaff Campus, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK

    John Littlewood

  4. School of Engineering and Built Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Chandima Ekanyake

  5. Griffith Sciences, School of Engineering and Built Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Ljubo Vlacic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wilkinson, S., Morrison, G.M. (2019). Enablers of an Electricity System Transition. In: Kaparaju, P., Howlett, R., Littlewood, J., Ekanyake, C., Vlacic, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018. KES-SEB 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04293-6_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation