Skip to main content

Occupant Interaction with As-Designed Smart Heating: Impacts upon Energy Use & Thermal Comfort

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018 (KES-SEB 2018)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 131))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1157 Accesses

Abstract

This paper explores the potential causes and effects of dwelling occupant interactions with low-carbon heating technologies, and the impact these have on energy use and their thermal comfort and satisfaction. This paper reports quantitative data of observed occupant interactions with installed heating provisions in context of previously reported monitored energy and environmental data from a one-year Post-occupancy study of low carbon dwellings in Wales, UK. The study formed part of the InnovateUK (formerly the Technology Strategy Board (TSB)); UK wide Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) programme completed in 2015. The case study reported includes nine and four low carbon single-storey flats and two-storey homes, with underfloor space heating and domestic hot water supplied from exhaust air sourced heat pumps (EASHP’s). One year monitored energy and environmental data within one of each dwelling-type evidenced significant underperformance of the installed EASHP’s heating systems as to establish a Performance Gap between the original design-intents and the delivered as-built in-use dwellings. The reasons were identified as being multifaceted including, incorrect installation, commissioning and maintenance of installed systems and issues with the thermal performance of the as-built fabric. The study further highlighted noteworthy issues surrounding the use of newer technologies to meet increasingly stringent energy and carbon efficiency targets without the necessary knowledge and understanding within design, construction and commissioning project stakeholders. Further, project data indicates that this is translated down-the-line within the life-cycle of the building and the extent of the Knowledge Gap’ is utmost among the building occupiers such that end-users are observed to develop detrimental behaviour strategies in the provision of their internal comfort levels and environmental conditions. Whilst well-intended ’on-paper’ design-intents appear to meet the legislative drivers for dwellings, this paper also highlights that the application of increasingly ‘smarter’ technologies impose significant challenges and barriers to end-users such that the original design intents can never be fully realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Technology Strategy Board. Building Performance Evaluation, Domestic Buildings Version 7 – February 2012. Guidance for Project Execution (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palmer, J., Godoy-Shimizu, D., Tillson, A., Mawditt, I.: Building Performance Evaluation Programme: Findings from domestic projects Making reality match design. Innovate UK (2016). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/low-carbon-homes-best-strategies-and-pitfalls. Accessed 13 May 2018

  3. Littlewood, J.R., Davies, G.J., Smallwood, I.: Energy and environmental performance of the Abertridwr community’ – first winter season. Energy Procedia 62, 532–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.415

  4. Littlewood, J.R., Smallwood, I.: Testing building fabric performance and the impacts upon occupant safety, energy use and carbon inefficiencies in dwellings. Energy Procedia 83, 454–463 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.165

  5. Littlewood, J.R., Smallwood, I.: One Year Building Performance Evaluation for a Micro-community of Low carbon Dwellings in Wales, UK. Energy Procedia 111, 387–396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.200

  6. Sustainable Construction Monitoring and Research Ltd. Domestic Buildings Phase 2: In-use performance and post occupancy evaluation, Final Report, December 2015. Project 450103, Unpublished. Innovate UK, Swindon, UK (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dollar, T., Edwards, P.: Builders’ book – an illustrated guide to building energy efficient homes. Zerocarbonhub (2016). http://www.zerocarbonhub.org/sites/default/files/resources/reports/Zero%20Carbon%20Hub%202015%20FINAL%20REV%202910_WEB.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar 2018

  8. HM Majesty’s Treasury. Fixing the foundations: Creating a more prosperous nation. Crown copyright 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. HM Majesty’s Government. Climate Change Act 2008, Chapter 21. Crown copyright 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zero Carbon Hub. Closing the gap between design and as-built performance; Evidence Review Report March 2014. Copyright Zero Carbon Hub 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. NHBC Foundation. 2011. How occupants behave and interact with their homes: The impact on energy use, comfort, control and satisfaction. © NHBC FoundationNF35. IHS BRE Press on behalf of the NHBC Foundation, October 2011. ISBN 978-1-84806-213-9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Energy and Climate Change. The Future of Heating: Meeting the challenge. 2013. Crown copyright (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. CIBSE Climate Change and the Indoor Environment: Impacts and Adaptation; and Beating the Heat. UKCIP, Arup and the Department for Trade and Industry 2005

    Google Scholar 

  14. CIBSE. 2015. GVA/15 CIBSE Guide A: Environmental Design 2015. https://www.cibse.org/knowledge/knowledge-items/detail?id=a0q20000008I79JAAS. Accessed 25 May 2018

  15. Ormandy, D., Ezratty, V.: Health and thermal comfort: From WHO guidance to housing strategies. Energy Policy 2012(49), 116–121 (2011). http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/42205/1/WRAP_Ormandy_Ormandyzratty%20FINAL%202011-10-31.pdf

  16. Building Research Establishment. 2016. SAP 2012 Conventions. https://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/SAP/2012/SAP-Conventions.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Littlewood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Littlewood, J.R., Smallwood, I. (2019). Occupant Interaction with As-Designed Smart Heating: Impacts upon Energy Use & Thermal Comfort. In: Kaparaju, P., Howlett, R., Littlewood, J., Ekanyake, C., Vlacic, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018. KES-SEB 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04293-6_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics