Advertisement

Evaluating Occupant Wellbeing in Retrofitted Dwellings with the Short Form 36 Questionnaire

  • D. JahicEmail author
  • J. R. Littlewood
  • G. Karani
  • J. Atkinson
  • D. Bolton
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 131)

Abstract

This paper discusses a research project led by Cardiff Metropolitan University (Cardiff Met) in collaboration with Being Greener at Melin Homes under the Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarship two (KESS2). Following Being Greener’s successful completion of managing the Arbed 2 scheme in Wales UK between 2012 and 2014, Cardiff Met is working with Melin Homes property occupants who’s properties have undergone retrofit applications, to investigate if they have experienced any changes to their thermal comfort, health and wellbeing as well as fuel poverty. There is much work to date in the UK which focuses upon investigating impacts upon the dwellings themselves, however, there is very limited research which looks at the relationship between occupant thermal comfort, health and wellbeing and fuel poverty within these dwellings. The use of the short form (SF) 36 questionnaire is incorporated into the methodology and is being piloted on a sample size of Arbed occupants. Context to the academic, scientific, and industrial challenges are discussed. This paper will be useful for academics, landlords of housing stock undergoing retrofit measures and government agencies funding retrofit upgrades to dwellings.

Keywords

Retrofit Health and wellbeing Residential typologies Thermal comfort Fuel poverty Energy performance SF36 questionnaire 

References

  1. 1.
    Jahic, D., Littlewood, J.R., Karani, G., Atkinson, J., Bolton, D., Geens, A.J.: Improving existing deprived dwellings in Wales: evaluating occupant thermal comfort and health and wellbeing. In: Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society International Conference, September 2017, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. Poster papers (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Littlewood, J.R., Karani, G., Atkinson, J., Bolton, D., Geens, A.J., Jahic, D.: Introduction to a Wales project for evaluating residential retrofit measures and impacts on energy performance, occupant fuel poverty, health and thermal comfort. Energy Procedia 134, 835–844 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Welsh Government: Arbed - Strategic energy performance investment programme (2013). http://gov.wales/topics/environmentcountryside/energy/efficiency/Arbed/?lang=en. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  4. 4.
    Welsh Assembly Government: Arbed Strategic Energy Performance Investment Programme (2010). http://www.communities-first.org/eng/news/Arbed_strategic_energy_performance_investment_programme/. Accessed 27 Mar 2017
  5. 5.
    Atkinson, J., Littlewood, J.R., Geens, A.J., Karani, G.: Did ARBED I save energy in Wales’ deprived dwellings. Energy Procedia 63 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atkinson, J., Littlewood, J.R., Geens, A.J., Karani, G.: Relieving fuel poverty in Wales with external wall insulation. Engineering Sustainability 170(2), 93–101 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hopper, J., Littlewood, J., Taylor, T., Counsell, J., Thomas, A., Karani, G., Geens, A., Evans, N.: Assessing retrofitted external wall insulation using infrared thermography. Struct. Surv. 30(3), 245–266 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patterson, J.: Arbed 1 Scheme Evaluation of the Warm Wales Programme. Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopper, J., Littlewood, J., Geens, A., Karani, G., Counsell, J., Thomas, A.: Improving existing deprived dwellings in Wales: monitoring and evaluating thermal performance. In: International Post-Graduate Research Conference 2011, pp. 162–173, 14 September 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Welsh Government: Fuel Poverty (2017). http://gov.wales/topics/environmentcountryside/energy/fuelpoverty/?lang=en. Accessed 21 February 2018
  11. 11.
    Age UK: Cold homes cost NHS £1.36 billion (2012). https://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-news/archive/cold-homes-cost-nhs-1-point-36-billion/. Accessed 21 February 2018
  12. 12.
    Nest: Improving Energy Efficiency. Nest Annual Report 2016/17. Iss: 1, p. 14 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butcher, J.: Fuel poverty: how to improve health and wellbeing through action on affordable warmth. UK Health Forum 1(2), 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steemers, K., Manchanda, S.: Energy efficient design and occupant well-being: case studies in the UK and India. Build. Environ. 45(2), 270–278 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wotton, H.: The Elements of Architecture, p. 123. Iohn Bill, Ohio (1624)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duijvestein, K.: Sustainable building tetraeder. SOM BOOM Dioc leaflet, Delft (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wordnet: Search (2018). http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=happiness. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  18. 18.
    Andersen, R.V., Olesen, B., Toftum, J.: Simulation of the Effects of Occupant Behaviour on Indoor Climate and Energy Consumption. WellBeing Indoors, p. 6 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schweiker, M., Shukuya, M.: Comparative effects of building envelope improvements and occupant behavioural changes on the exergy consumption for heating and cooling. Energy Policy 38, 2976–2986 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Angelotti, A., Caputo, P.: The exergy approach for the evaluation of heating and cooling technologies; first results comparing steady state and dynamic simulations. Department of Building Environment Science & Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Italy (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicol, J.F.: Characterising occupant behaviour in buildings: towards a stochastic model of occupant use of windows, lights, blinds, heaters and fans. Build. Simul. 1(13–15), 1073–1078 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raja, I.A., Nicol, J.F., McCartney, K.J.: Natural ventilated buildings: use of controls for changing indoor climate. Renew. Energy 15(1–4), 391–394 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Socolow, R.H.: Saving Energy in the Home: Princeton’s Experiments at Twin Rivers. Ballinger Pub. Co., Philadelphia (1978)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buso, T., Fabi, V., Anderson, R.K., Corgnati, S.P.: Occupant behaviour and robustness of building design. Build. Environ. 94(2), 694–703 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Welsh Government: Warm Homes (2017). http://gov.wales/topics/environmentcountryside/energy/efficiency/warm-homes/?lang=en. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  26. 26.
    Ofgem: Support for improving your home (2018). https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes/eco. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  27. 27.
    Ofgem: How Ofgem is creating a more competitive, fairer market (2018). https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes/eco. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  28. 28.
    HACT: About us (2018). http://www.hact.org.uk/. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  29. 29.
    Hays, R.D., Sherbourne, C.D., Mazel, R.M.: The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 2(3), 217–227 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klassen, A., Fitzpatrick, R., Jenkinson, C., et al.: Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? a comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey. BMJ 313, 454–457 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fairbank, J., Frost, H., Wilson-MacDonald, J., et al.: Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 330, 1233–1239 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thomson, H., Petticrew, M., Morrison, D.: Health effects of housing improvement: systematic review of intervention studies. BMJ 323, 187–190 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7306.187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wong, S.K., So, W.Y., Yau, P.Y., et al.: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbidly obese patients: early outcome in a Chinese cohort. Hong Kong Med. J. 11, 20–29 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rajeswari, R., Muniyandi, M., Balasubramanian, R., et al.: Perceptions of tuberculosis patients about their physical, mental and social well-being: a field report from South India. Soc. Sci. Med. 60, 1845–1853 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Groeneweg, R., Kropman, H., Leopold, H., et al.: The effectiveness and cost-evaluation of manual therapy and physical therapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic non specific neck pain. Rationale and design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 11, 14 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ghaddar, A., Mateo, I., Sanchez, P.: Occupational stress and mental health among correctional officers: a cross-sectional study. J. Occup. Health 50, 92–98 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.50.92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ware, J.E., Brook, R.H., Williams, K.N., et al.: Conceptualisation and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance study. Model Health Methodol. 1 (1980)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tarlov, A.R., Ware Jr., J.E., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E.C., Perrin, E., Zubkoff, M.: The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262(7), 925–930 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rand Health: 36 item short form survey (SF-36) (1969). https://www.rand.org/hea-lth/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  40. 40.
    Keller, S.D., Ware Jr., J.E., Bentler, P.M., Aaronson, N.K., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., et al.: Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: results from the IQOLA Project. Int. Qual. Life Assess. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 51(11), 1179–1188 (1998)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poortinga, W., Grey, C., Jiang, S.: Arbed Recipient’s Views and Experiences of Living in Hard-to-Heat, Hard-to-Treat Houses in Wales: Results from Three Focus Groups Conducted in South Wales. Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University (2017)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grey, C., Jiang, S., Poortinga, W.: Arbed recipient’s views and experiences of living in hard-to-heat, hard-to-treat, houses in Wales: Results from three focus groups conducted in south Wales (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ASHRAE: Position Document on Indoor Air Quality. Executive Summary, p. 3 (2017)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    PubMed: Search Tool (2018). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  45. 45.
    Lins, L., Carvalho, F.M.: SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 4, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Karani, G., Bradburn, M., Evans, M.: SF-36 health survey, Indoor Environment and Housing Renovation (2010). http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/environment/2010/89-785.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018
  47. 47.
    FLIR: FLIR MR176 Imaging Moisture Reader with IGM (2018). http://www.flir.co.uk/home/. Accessed 20 Apr 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Jahic
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. R. Littlewood
    • 1
  • G. Karani
    • 2
  • J. Atkinson
    • 1
  • D. Bolton
    • 3
  1. 1.The Sustainable and Resilient Built Environment (SuRBe) GroupCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.The Environmental Public Health GroupCardiff Metropolitan UniversityCardiffUK
  3. 3.Being Greener, Melin HomesPontypoolUK

Personalised recommendations