Skip to main content

Knowledge Driven Intelligent Survey Systems for Linguists

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Semantic Technology (JIST 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11341))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose Knowledge Graph (KG), an articulated underlying semantic structure, to be a semantic bridge between human and systems. To illustrate our proposal, we focus on KG based intelligent survey systems. In state of the art systems, knowledge is hard-coded or implicit in these systems, making it hard for researchers to reuse, customise, link, or transmit the structured knowledge. Furthermore, such systems do not facilitate dynamic interaction based on the semantic structure. We design and implement a knowledge-driven intelligent survey system which is based on knowledge graph, a widely used technology that facilitates sharing and querying hypotheses, survey content, results, and analyses. The approach is developed, implemented, and tested in the field of Linguistics. Syntacticians and morphologists develop theories of grammar of natural languages. To evaluate theories, they seek intuitive grammaticality (well-formedness) judgments from native speakers, which either support a theory or provide counter-evidence. Our preliminary experiments show that a knowledge graph based linguistic survey can provide more nuanced results than traditional document-based grammaticality judgment surveys by allowing for tagging and manipulation of specific linguistic variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.mturk.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.surveymonkey.com.

  3. 3.

    https://www.psytoolkit.org/.

  4. 4.

    To save space, we do not include domain and range axioms here.

  5. 5.

    https://formbuilder.online/.

  6. 6.

    https://surveyjs.io/.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.ccunix.ccu.edu.tw/~lngmyers/MJFAQ.htm.

References

  1. Pan, J.Z., Vetere, G., Manuel Gomez-Perez, J., Wu, H.: Exploiting Linked Data and Knowledge Graphs for Large Organisations. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45654-6. ISBN 978-3-319-45654-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan, J.Z., et al. (eds.): Reasoning Web 2016. LNCS, vol. 9885. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7. ISBN 978-3-319-49493-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan, J.Z., Staab, S., Aßmann, U., Ebert, J., Zhao, Y.: Ontology-Driven Software Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31226-7. ISBN 978-3-642-31226-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnelly, K.: SNOMED-CT: the advanced terminology and coding system for eHealth. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 121, 279–290 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tzitzikas, Y., et al.: Integrating heterogeneous and distributed information about marine species through a top level ontology. In: Garoufallou, E., Greenberg, J. (eds.) MTSR 2013. CCIS, vol. 390, pp. 289–301. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03437-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiarcos, C., Cimiano, P., Declerck, T., McCrae, J.P.: Linguistic linked open data. Introduction and overview. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Linked Data in Linguistics (LDL 2013): Representing and Linking Lexicons, Terminologies and Other Language Data, pp. 1–9 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murray, T., Simon, B.L.: At the intersection of regional and social dialects: the case of like + past participle in American English. Am. Speech 77(1), 32–69 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Edelstein, E.: This syntax needs studied. In: Zanuttini, R., Horn, L.R. (eds.) Micro-Syntactic Variation in North American English, pp. 242–268. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Poveda-Villalón, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: OOPS!(OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 10(2), 7–34 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giunchiglia, F., ChenuAbente, R.: Scientific knowledge objects v. 1. University of Trento (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bechhofer, S., et al.: Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(2), 599–611 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlereth, C., Skiera, B.: DISE: dynamic intelligent survey engine. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds.) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management, pp. 225–243. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Myers, J.: MiniJudge: software for minimalist experimental syntax. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing, pp. 271–285 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T.Y., Myers, J.: Worldlikeness: a web-based tool for typological psycholinguistic research. Univ. Penn. Work. Pap. Linguist. 23(1), 21–30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, F., Gunasekharan, S., Mayo, N., Corley, M.: Timing accuracy of web experiments: a case study using the WebExp software package. Behav. Res. Methods 41(1), 1–12 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibex 0.3.8 Manual. http://spellout.net/latest_ibex_manual.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 18

  17. Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S., Fedorenko, K.: Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Lang. Linguist. Compass 5(8), 509–524 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erlewine, M.Y., Kotek, H.: A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 34(2), 481–495 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported the EU Marie Currie K-Drive project (286348).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Z. Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soares, R., Edelstein, E., Pan, J.Z., Wyner, A. (2018). Knowledge Driven Intelligent Survey Systems for Linguists. In: Ichise, R., Lecue, F., Kawamura, T., Zhao, D., Muggleton, S., Kozaki, K. (eds) Semantic Technology. JIST 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04284-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04284-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04283-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04284-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics