Subspace Identification Based Modeling and Control of Batch Particulate Processes

  • Prashant MhaskarEmail author
  • Abhinav Garg
  • Brandon Corbett
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)


This Chapter addresses the problem of subspace based model identification and predictive control of particulate process subject to uncertainty and time varying parameters. To this end, subspace identification techniques are first adapted to handle the batch nature of the data. A linear model predictive controller (MPC) is next formulated to enable achieving a particle size distribution with desired characteristics subject to both manipulated input and product quality constraints. The proposed approach is implemented on a seeded batch crystallizer process and compared with an open loop policy as well as a traditional trajectory tracking policy using classical control. The proposed MPC is shown to achieve superior performance and the ability to respect tighter product quality constraints as well as robustness to uncertainty.


  1. 1.
    Immanuel, C.D., Wang, Y., Bianco, N.: Feedback controllability assessment and control of particle size distribution in emulsion polymerisation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63, 1205–1216 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alhamad, B., Romagnoli, J.A., Gomes, V.G.: On-line multi-variable predictive control of molar mass and particle size distributions in free-radical emulsion copolymerization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 6596–6606 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corbett, B., Mhaskar, P.: Subspace identification for data-driven modeling and quality control of batch processes. AIChE J. 62, 1581–1601 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doyle, F.J., Harrison, C.A., Crowley, T.J.: Hybrid model-based approach to batch-to-batch control of particle size distribution in emulsion polymerization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 1153–1163 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park, M., Dokucu, M.: Regulation of the emulsion particle size distribution to an optimal trajectory using partial least squares model-based predictive control. Ind. Eng. 7227–7237 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rawlings, J.B., Miller, S.M., Witkowski, W.R.: Model identification and control of solution crystallization processes: a review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32, 1275–1296 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, S.M., Rawlings, J.B.: Model identification and control strategies for batch cooling crystallizers. AIChE J. 40, 1312–1327 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi, D., El-Farra, N.H., Li, M., Mhaskar, P., Christofides, P.D.: Predictive control of particle size distribution in particulate processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 268–281 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moonen, M., Moor, B.D., Vandenberghe, L., Vandewalle, J.: On- and off-line identification of linear state-space models. Int. J. Control 49, 219–232 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hyndman, R.J., Koehler, A.B.: Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. Int. J. Forecast. 22, 679–688 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yabuki, Y., MacGregor, J.F.: Product quality control in semibatch reactors using midcourse correction policies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 1268–1275 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kourti, T., Lee, J., MacGregor, J.F.: Experiences with industrial applications of projection methods for multivariate statistical process control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 20, S745–S750 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prashant Mhaskar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abhinav Garg
    • 1
  • Brandon Corbett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations