Spatial Storytelling: Finding Interdisciplinary Immersion

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)


This paper is part of an ongoing transdisciplinary research into immersion. In specific, it focuses on Spatial Storytelling to examine the narrative technique in conjunction with Spatial Presence, a commonly accepted subtype of Presence. How our real-life occupation is a constant narrative making exercise and how storytelling is ingrained in our movement in space. It is argued here that immersion and presence models stand to benefit from spatial theory, particularly, the body of work surrounding spatial practices and narratives. Further, that the incorporation of spatial theory adds to the necessary versatility required in approaching immersion, which has been thus far dominated by positivist empiricism. Contributions of a theorized space are also found missing from interactive storytelling and videogames where subject/object interactivity is seen as mere actions performed inside a given space whereas the paper argues that space is learnt through such involvement.


Immersion Presence Spatial Storytelling Spatial practice 


  1. 1.
    BBC Sports page. Accessed 1 July 2018
  2. 2.
    Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Williams, G.: Quantifying immersion in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 13–18. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., LA (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burdea Grigore, C., Coiffet, P.: Virtual Reality Technology. Wiley-Interscience, London (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L.: Immersion/emersion: presence in hybrid environments. In: Proceedings of Presence 2002: 5th Annual International Workshop, Porto, Portugal (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bowman, D.A., McMahan, R.P.: Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7), 36–43 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Böcking, S.: Spatial presence theory: state of the art and challenges ahead. In: Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., IJsselsteijn, W., Schaevitz, R. (eds.) Immersed in Media, pp. 115–135. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biocca, F.: Lighting a path while immersed in presence: a wayward introduction. In: Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., IJsselsteijn, W., Schaevitz, R. (eds.) Immersed in Media, pp. 1–9. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombard, M., Jones, M.T.: Defining Presence. In: Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., IJsselsteijn, W., Schaevitz, R. (eds.) Immersed in Media, pp. 13–34. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slater, M.: A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3), 1–5 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mestre, D., Fuchs, P., Berthoz, A., Vercher, J.L.: Immersion et présence. In: Le traité de la réalité virtuelle, 1st volume, p. 309-38. Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morie, J.F.: Ontological implications of Being in immersive virtual environments. In: The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2008. SPIE, USA, vol. 6804, article id. 680408 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wirth, W., et al.: A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychol. 9(3), 493–525 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biocca, F.: The cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeltzer, D.: Autonomy, interaction, and presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(1), 127–132 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coyne, R.: Heidegger and virtual reality: the implications of Heidegger’s thinking for computer representations. Leonardo 27(1), 65–73 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davies, C., Harrison, J.: Osmose: towards broadening the aesthetics of virtual reality. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 30(4), 25–28 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vanderbilt, T.: These tricks make virtual reality feel real. Nautilus 32 (2016). Accessed 28 July 2018
  21. 21.
    McMahan, A.: Immersion, engagement and presence. In: The Video Game Theory Reader, 1st edn., pp. 67–85. Routledge, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davies, C.: Osmose: notes on being in immersive virtual space. Digit. Creat. 9(2), 65–74 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McLellan, H.: Virtual realities. In: Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 4th edn., pp. 457–487. Springer, London (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morie, J.F.: Performing in (virtual) spaces: embodiment and being in virtual environments. Int. J. Perform. Arts Digit. Media 3(2–3), 123–138 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qvortrup, L.: Introduction — welcome into the interface. In: Qvortrup, L. (ed.) Virtual Interaction: Interaction in Virtual Inhabited 3D Worlds, pp. 1–18. Springer, London (2001). Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nilsson, N.C., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S.: Immersion revisited: a review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Hum. Technol. 12(2), 108–134 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perlin, K.: Future Reality: how emerging technologies will change language itself. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 36(3), 84–89 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De la Peña, N., et al.: Immersive journalism: immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 19(4), 291–301 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murray, J.H., Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 3rd edn. New Riders, Indianapolis (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ermi, L., Mäyrä, F.: Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion. In: Worlds in Play: International Perspectives on Digital Games Research, vol. 37(2), pp. 37–53 (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ryan, M.-L.: Narrative as virtual reality. In: Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, 1st edn. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Solso, R.L., McCarthy, J.E.: Prototype formation of faces: a case of pseudo-memory. Br. J. Psychol. 72(4), 499–503 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eglinton, A.: Reflections on a Decade of Punchdrunk Theatre. TheatreForum 37, 46 (2010). Questia OnlineGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jenkins, H.: Game design as narrative architecture. In: First Person: New Media as Story, Performance and Game, 1st edn., pp. 118–130. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Upload VR Gaming page. Accessed 30 June 2018
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Rakatansky, M.: Spatial narratives. In: Strategies in Architectural Thinking, 1st edn., pp. 198–221. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gilded age plains city page. Accessed 6 July 2018
  40. 40.
    Lefebvre, H., Nicholson-Smith, D.: The Production of Space. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    de Certeau, M.: The Practice of Everyday Life, 2nd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    University of Texas Spatial Theory Homepage. Accessed 7 July 2018
  43. 43.
    Soja, E.W.: Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Verso, London (1989)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Neuhaus, F.: Body space and spatial narrative. In: Emergent Spatio-temporal Dimensions of the City: Habitus and Urban Rhythms, pp. 37–54. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  45. 45.
    Coyne, R.: Thinking through virtual reality: place, non-place and situated cognition. Techné Res. Philos. Technol. 10(3), 26–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dunn, S.: Space as an Artefact: a perspective on ‘Neogeography’ from the digital humanities. In: Digital Research in the Study of Classical Antiquity, 1st edn., pp. 53–72. Ashgate, Burlington VT (2010)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Drucker, J.: Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digit. Hum. Q. 5(1), 1–21 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gibson, J.: The theory of affordances. In: Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, 1st edn., pp. 67–82. University of Michigan, Michigan (1977)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Velho, L., Lucio, D., Carvalho, L.: Situated participatory virtual reality. In: Proceedings of XVI Simposio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, Curitiba, Brazil (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of Science & Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations