Narrative Consistency across Replays of Pro-social Interactive Digital Narratives

  • Jonathan BarbaraEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)


Studies showing the influence of pro-social interactive digital narratives on their participants’ appreciation of the modelled situations are subject to having the participants perceiving their interaction as meaningful and being able to clearly understand the consequences of their actions. This paper suggests the supplementary use of the Narrative Consistency criterion to assess the participants’ understanding of the modelled social context by measuring how the interactive narrative’s outcomes meet their expectations across replays.


Interactive narratives Criticism Narrative consistency 


  1. 1.
    Aylett, R.: Emergent narrative, social immersion and “storification”. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 35–44 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbara, J.: Towards measuring consistency across transmedial narratives. In: Schoenau-Fog, H., Bruni, L.E., Louchart, S., Baceviciute, S. (eds.) ICIDS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9445, pp. 243–250. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busselle, R., Bilandzic, H.: Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychol. 12(4), 321–347 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardona-Rivera, R.E., et al.: Foreseeing Meaningful Choices. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE 2014) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher, W.R.: Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green, M.C., Jenkins, K.M.: Interactive narratives: processes and outcomes in user-directed stories. J. Commun. 64(3), 479–500 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koenitz, H., Dubbelman, T., Knoller, N., Roth, C.: An integrated and iterative research direction for interactive digital narrative. In: Nack, F., Gordon, Andrew S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 51–60. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luo, L., et al.: A review of interactive narrative systems and technologies: a training perspective. Simulation 91(2), 126–147 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muriel, D., Crawford, G.: Video Games as Culture. Routledge, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Simon and Schuster, New York City (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parrott, S., et al.: A test of interactive narrative as a tool against prejudice. Howard J. Commun. 28(4), 374–389 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabinowitz, P.J.: Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Cornell University Press, Columbus (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riedl, M.O., Bulitko, V.: Interactive narrative: an intelligent systems approach. Ai Mag. 34(1), 67 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riedl, M.O., Young, R.M.: Narrative planning: balancing plot and character. J. Artif. Intelligence Res. 39, 217–268 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rieser, M.: Interactive narratives: a form of fiction? convergence. Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 3(1), 10–19 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roth, C., et al.: Exploring replay value: shifts and continuities in user experiences between first and second exposure to an interactive story. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(7), 378–381 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roth, C., Koenitz, H.: Evaluating the user experience of interactive digital narrative. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities, pp. 31–36. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roth, C., Koenitz, H.: Towards creating a body of evidence-based interactive digital narrative design knowledge: approaches and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia Alternate Realities, pp. 19–24. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skov, M.B., Andersen, P.B.: Designing interactive narratives. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Semiotics in Games and New Media, pp. 59–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steinemann, S.T., et al.: Increasing donating behavior through a game for change: the role of interactivity and appreciation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 319–329. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steinemann, S.T., et al.: Interactive narratives affecting social change. J. Media Psychol. (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wardrip-Fruin, N., et al.: Agency reconsidered. breaking new ground: innovation in games, play, practice and theory. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2009 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leuphana University of LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Saint Martin’s Institute of Higher EducationHamrunMalta

Personalised recommendations