Advertisement

Conventional Offshore Processing of CO2-Rich Natural Gas

  • Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes AraújoEmail author
  • José Luiz de Medeiros
Chapter

Abstract

Having in mind that supersonic separator technologies for treating raw CO2-rich natural gas in offshore rigs, despite being promising, are totally unconventional and still under practical development, this chapter has the objective to put the conventional CO2-rich natural gas processing operations in perspective, so that an adequate appraisal of the new SS technologies on other chapters could be accessed having the conventional operations fairly situated on the background. This being said, this chapter briefly discusses general aspects of conventional technologies for offshore processing of CO2-rich natural gas, assessing performances of processing alternatives in terms of several numerical metrics including specific energy consumption, specific equipment footprint, equipment weight, specific methane loss, specific CO2 emissions. A recent literature review is also presented.

References

  1. Adewole, J.K., Ahmad, A.L., Ismail, S., Leo, C.P.: Current challenges in membrane separation of CO2 from natural gas: a review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 17, 46–65 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoli, E., Dillon, E.P., Cullum, B., Alemany, L.B., Barron, A.R.: Cross-linking amine-rich compounds into high performing selective CO2 absorbents. Sci. Rep. 4, 7304, 1–5 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07304. Viewed 06 June 2016. http://www.nature.com/scientificreports
  3. Araújo, O.Q.F., de Medeiros, J.L.: Carbon capture and storage technologies: present scenario and drivers of innovation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 17, 22–34 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2017.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araújo, O.Q.F., Medeiros, J.L., Yokoyama, L., Morgado, C.R.V.: Metrics for sustainability analysis of post-combustion abatement of CO2 emissions: microalgae mediated routes and CCS (carbon capture and storage). Energy 93(Part 3), 556–568 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araújo, O.Q.F., Reis, A.C., de Medeiros, J.L., Nascimento, J.F., Grava, W.M., Musse, A.P.: Comparative analysis of separation technologies for processing carbon dioxide rich natural gas in ultra-deepwater oil fields. J. Clean. Prod. 155, 12–22 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arinelli, L.O., Trotta, T.A.F., Teixeira, A.M., de Medeiros, J.L., Araújo, O.Q.F.: Offshore processing of CO2 rich natural gas with supersonic separator versus conventional routes. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 46, 199–221 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton, C., Hambling, H., Albaugh, E.K., Mahlstedt, B., Davis, D.: Worldwide survey of floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) units. 2017. Available in: www.offshore-mag.com/content/dam/offshore/print-articles/volume-77/08/2017FPSO-072017-Ads.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  8. Baker, R.W., Lokhandwala, K.: Natural gas processing with membranes: an overview. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47(7), 2109–2121 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie071083wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beggel, F., Nowik, I.J., Modigell, M., Shalygin, M.G., Teplyakov, V.V., Zenkevitch, V.B.: A novel gas purification system for biologically produced gases. J. Clean. Prod. 18, S43–S50 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucklin, R.W., Schendel, R.L.: Comparison of physical solvents used for gas processing. In: Newman, S.A. (ed.) Acid and Sour Gas Treating Process (Chap. 2), p. 1197. Gulf Publishing, Houston (1985)Google Scholar
  11. Closmann, F., Nguyen, T., Rochelle, G.T.: MDEA/Piperazine as a solvent for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 1, 1351–1357 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Medeiros, J.L., Barbosa, L.C., Araújo, O.Q.F.: Equilibrium approach for CO2 and H2S absorption with aqueous solutions of alkanolamines: theory and parameter estimation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 9203–9226 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302558bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Formigli Filho, J.M., Pinto, A.C.C., Almeida, A.S.A.: Santos Basin’s Pre-Salt Reservoirs Development—The Way Ahead, OTC 19953. 2009 Offshore Technology Conference, 2009, Houston, 4–7 May USA.  https://doi.org/10.4043/19953-ms
  14. Gaffney, Cline & Associates: Review and Evaluation of Ten Selected Discoveries and Prospects in the Pre-salt Play of the Deepwater Santos Basin, Brazil, CG/JW/RLG/C1820.00/ GCABA.1914, ANP, September 15th, 2010. Viewed 20 December 2015. www.anp.gov.br/?dw=39137(2015) 
  15. Gallo, W.L.R., Gallego, A.G., Acevedo, V.L., Dias, R., Ortiz, H.Y., Valente, B.A.: Exergy analysis of the compression systems and its prime movers for a FPSO unit. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 44, 287–298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.04.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gazalpour, F., Ren, S.R., Tohidi, B.: CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoirs. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 60(3), 537–546 (2005). (Rev. IFP)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GE Aviation: GE’s Popular LM6000 Now Available in Gas Turbine-Generator Set. Viewed 30 January 2016. http://www.geaviation.com/press/marine/marine_2003415.html (2016)
  18. Hall, C.A.S., Lambert, J.G., Balogh, S.B.: EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64, 141–152 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hao, J., Rice, P.A., Stern, S.A.: Upgrading low-quality natural gas with H2S and CO2 selective polymer membranes: part II. Process design, economics, and sensitivity study of membrane stages with recycle streams. J. Membrane Sci. 320(1–2), 108–122 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harkin, T., Hoadley, A., Hooper, B.: Reducing the energy penalty of CO2 capture and compression using pinch analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 857–866 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jariwala, A.: Wanted: Efficient Gas Treatment System to Fit Tight FPSO Footprint. EPmag.com. Viewed 30 January 2016, http://origin.cameron.siteworx.com/media/cam/resources/2015/10/29/22/41/spt-wanted-efficient-gas-treatment-system-hart-ep-magazine-article-September-2015.ashx (2015)
  22. Kohl, A., Nielsen, R.: Gas Purification, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing, Houston (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Kwak, D.H., Yun, D., Binns, M., Yeo, Y.K., Kim, J.K.: Conceptual process design of CO2 recovery plants for enhanced oil recovery applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 14385–14396 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502110qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, A.L., Feldkirchner, H.L., Stern, S.A., Houde, A.Y., Gamez, J.P., Meyer, H.S.: Fields tests of membrane modules for the separation of carbon dioxide from low-quality natural gas. Gas Sep. Purif. 9(1), 35–43 (1995).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4214(95)92175-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luu, M.T., Milani, D., Abbas, A.: Analysis of CO2 utilization for methanol synthesis integrated with enhanced gas recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3540–3554 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malone, T., Kuuskraa, V., Dipietro, P.: CO2-EOR Resource Assessment. DOE/NETL-2014/1631, 2014. DOE Contract Number DE-FE0004001. Viewed 30 January 2016 http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/temp/FY14_CO2-EOROffshoreResourceAssessment_060114.pdf
  27. Peters, L., Hussain, A., Follmann, M., Melina, T., Hägg, M.-B.: CO2 removal from natural gas by employing amine absorption and membrane technology—a technical and economical analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 172, 952–960 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinto, A.C.C., Vaz, C.E.M., Branco, C.C.M., Ribeiro, J.: An evaluation of large capacity processing units, for ultra deep water and high GOR oil fields. 2014. OTC-25274-MS, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. Reis, A.C., de Medeiros, J.L., Nunes, G.C., Araújo, O.Q.F.: Upgrading of natural gas ultra-rich in carbon dioxide: optimal arrangement of membrane skids and polishing with chemical absorption. J. Clean. Prod. 165, 1013–1024 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reis, A.C., de Medeiros, J.L., Nunes, G.C., Araújo, O.Q.F.: Lifetime oriented design of natural gas offshore processing for cleaner production and sustainability: high carbon dioxide content. J. Clean. Prod. 200, 269–281 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivera-Tinoco, R., Bouallou, C.: Comparison of absorption rates and absorption capacity of ammonia solvents with MEA and MDEA aqueous blends for CO2 capture. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 875–880 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shimekit, B., Mukhtar, H.: Natural gas purification technologies-major advances for CO2 separation and future directions. In: Hamid, A.M. (ed.) Advances in Natural Gas Technology, pp. 235–270. InTech, China.  https://doi.org/10.5772/38656 (2012)
  33. Struyf, S.: Overview of UOP Membrane Technology for Acid Gas Removal. Sour Gas Meeting 30 January, 2011, United Arab Emirates. Viewed 30 January 2016 http://core.theenergyexchange.co.uk/agile_assets/1282/13.05_-_STEVEN_STRUYF.pdf
  34. Thiabaud, P., Gros, F., Tourdjman, J., Guaraldo, M.: Benefits of life cycle dynamic simulation for FPSO projects and offshore developments. SPE-143532-MS. Brasil Offshore, 14–17 June, Macaé, Brazil.  https://doi.org/10.2118/143532-ms (2011)
  35. Turton, R., Bailie, R.C., Whiting, W. B., Shaeiwitz, J.A., Bhattacharyya, D.: Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Michigan (2012) ISBN-13: 978-0-13-261812-0Google Scholar
  36. Vahl, F.P., Filho, N.C.: Energy transition and path creation for natural gas in the Brazilian electricity mix. J. Clean. Prod. 86, 221–229 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valenti, G., Bonalumi, D., Macchi, E.: A parametric investigation of the chilled ammonia process from energy and economic perspectives. Fuel 101, 74–83 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. WASCO Energy Group. Project Data Sheet. FPSO Cidade de Mangaratiba Centrifugal Reinjection Compressor Package. 2013. Viewed 30 January 2016. http://www.wascoenergy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/ManDandT_PetroBras.pdf
  39. Yu, L.C., King, L.S., Hoon, A.T.C., Yean, P.C.C.: A review study of oil and gas facilities for fixed and floating offshore platforms. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 10(6), 672–679 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.10.2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, Y., Sunarso, J., Liu, S., Wang, R.: Current status and development of membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: a review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con. 12, 84–107 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ofélia de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Luiz de Medeiros
    • 1
  1. 1.Escola de QuímicaFederal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations