Skip to main content
  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

Protection of some open access youth work provision by a minority of councils and by ad hoc forms of support from some lower tier authorities. The emergence of alternative organisational structures such as mutuals and other forms of social enterprise for providing both open access facilities and forms of targeted practice with young people. The search for new sources of funding for youth work—in particular the Lottery, philanthropic bodies and ‘socially responsible’ private businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Bell, Michael, et al. 2013. ‘It’s Business as Usual: Newcastle, Commissioning and Cuts’. Youth and Policy. No 110. May, pp. 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Sian. 2017a. The Dramatic Disappearance of Support and Facilities for Young People in London. Green Party. January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Sian. 2017b. Youth Service Cuts in London—What Next? Green Party. March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Sian. 2018. London’s Lost Youth Services 2018. Green Party. March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakelian, Anoosh. 2018. ‘The False Economy of Youth Club Closures: Haringey’s Struggle to Protect Services’. New Statesman. 31 August, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauth, Becky, et al. 2012. Exploring the Potential of Employers to Support Youth Services. Business in the Community. London: National Children’s Bureau/UK Youth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Will. 2015. ‘Austerity Youth Policy: Exploring the Distinctions Between Youth Work in Principle and Youth Work in Practice’. Youth and Policy. No. 114. May, pp. 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCIA/Waterhouse, Penny. 2014. ‘Commissioning & Consortia—An Advantage or a Threat?’ December. http://independentaction.net/blog/2014/12/10/commissioning-consortia-an-advantage-or-a-threat/.

  • Norris, Pat and Pugh, Carole. 2015. ‘Local Authority Youth Work’, in Bright, Graham (ed). Youth Work: Histories, Policy, Contexts. London: Palgrave, pp. 80–101, 236–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unison. 2014. The Damage: UK Youth Services—How Cuts Are Removing Opportunities for Young People and Damaging Their Lives. London: Unison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unison. 2016. The Damage: A Future at Risk—Cuts in Youth Services. London: Unison.

    Google Scholar 

  • YMCA. 2018. Youth and Consequences: A Report Examining Local Authority Expenditure on Youth Services in England and Wales. May.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Davies .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davies, B. (2019). The Local Youth Service Experience. In: Austerity, Youth Policy and the Deconstruction of the Youth Service in England. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03886-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03886-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03885-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03886-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics