Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee ((BIG))

Abstract

This chapter discusses several general problems that virtually any experiment in the Universal Basic Income will have to deal with: community effects, long-term effects, the Hawthorne effect, the streetlight effect, and the difficulty of separating the effects of the size and type of program being studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Richard G. Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better (London: Allen Lane, 2009).

  2. 2.

    Angus Deaton, “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning About Development,” in Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, ed. Dawn Langan Teele (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014), p. 177; Philippe Van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght, Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Harvard University Press, 2017), p. 143.

  3. 3.

    Jim McCambridge, John Witton, and Diana R. Elbourne, “Systematic Review of the Hawthorne Effect: New Concepts Are Needed to Study Research Participation Effects,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67, no. 3 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Thanks to Evelyn Forget for alerting me to this last issue.

  5. 5.

    Paul Johnson, “Parallel Histories of Retirement in Modern Britain,” in Old Age from Antiquity to Post-Modernity, ed. Paul Johnson and Pat Thane (London: Routledge, 1998); http://blog.spicker.uk/experiments-with-basic-income-were-never-going-to-settle-the-arguments/

  6. 6.

    P.K. Robins, “The Labor Supply Response of Twenty-Year Families in the Denver Income Maintenance Experiment,” Review of Economics and Statistics 66, no. 3 (1984); Widerquist, “A Failure to Communicate: What (If Anything) Can We Learn from the Negative Income Tax Experiments?”

  7. 7.

    Dawn Langan Teele, “Introduction,” in Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, ed. Dawn Langan Teele (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014); Angus Deaton, “Instruments, Randomization, and Learning About Development,” ibid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Widerquist .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Widerquist, K. (2018). Testing Difficulties. In: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03849-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03849-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03848-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03849-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics