Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Rent-Seekers, Profits, Wages and Inequality

Abstract

This book grew out from a partially supportive and partially critical evaluation of Thomas Piketty’s best-seller academic monograph, Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The authors’ main aim is to bring back the concept of rent, developed by David Ricardo two hundred years ago and show that inequalities cannot be explained without the concept of rent and limiting the analysis to profits and wages (as Piketty does) is theoretically false. What matters is not the extent of inequality, but its source. There is nothing generally evil about rents. There are no economies without rent. The two authors, Peter Mihályi, a macroeconomist and Iván Szelényi a sociologist take an interpretative, value-neutral position: some rents are necessary and inevitable, others are destructive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Let’s rewrite the rules so more companies share profits with their employees and fewer ship jobs and profits overseas.” “Let’s make sure that Wall Street, corporations, and the super-rich pay their fair share of taxes.” https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/five-important-steps-hillary-clinton-will-take-reduce-inequality-and-grow-our-economy/.

  2. 2.

    To debate this topic, the newspaper invited Jason Furman (Harvard Kennedy School) who argued in favor of the proposition and Deirdre McCloskey (University of Illinois at Chicago) who argued against. https://debates.economist.com/debate/capitalism.

  3. 3.

    Joseph Stiglitz who was chief economist of the World Bank for a while shared this view, so his tenure was cut short. As he left he received very negative reviews (see for instance the rather vitriolic “The bumpy ride of Joe Stiglitz,” The Economist, December 16, 1999), though in the past 15 years the Bank came closer to Stiglitz’s vision.

  4. 4.

    See the recent OECD publication covering 28 member countries by Balestra and Tonkin (2018).

  5. 5.

    Instead, we wholeheartedly recommend Robert D. Putnam’s (2015) masterful account of the visible erosion of social mobility which occurred during the lifetime of two American generations.

  6. 6.

    Few supporters of the progressive income tax system know that this idea was first coined by Marx and Engels in The Communist Manifesto (1848).

  7. 7.

    See Mihályi and Szelényi (2016a, b, c, d, 2017).

  8. 8.

    In Mihályi and Szelényi (2016b) we showed that the historical underpinning of Piketty’s own r  >  g model was a statistical artifact, arising from the intermingling of the concept of profit and rent on the one hand, and private capital (K) and wealth on the other.

  9. 9.

    Oxfam, the renowned charity timed the publication of its fresh research for the opening of the Davos economic summit and skillfully captured the headlines of many newspapers. Another sensational formulation of the same report was that “85 richest people on the planet have the same wealth as the poorest 50% (3.5 billion people)” Jacobs (2015).

  10. 10.

    In 2017, Soros’s net worth was estimated at $25 billion, but in early 2018, Soros had a net worth of merely $8 billion, after donating $18 billion to his philanthropic agency, the Open Society Foundations.

  11. 11.

    This term is usually attributed to F. Zakaria (1997) who used it to describe electoral regimes in developing countries, where leaders who exercised authoritarian rule nevertheless won popular elections. Viktor Orbán , the Hungarian prime minister in a speech on July 16, 2014 called the system he tries to implement in Hungary as illiberal democracy, digging this concept hidden for some twenty years in the ivory towers of political science and turning it into an integral part of political discourse. Whether his project is democratic has been hotly debated, but the term illiberal was not only widely accepted, and was now used to describe not only Hungary during the Orbán regime but also countries like Putin’s Russia or Erdogan’s Turkey . Orbán criticized liberalism as ignoring national interest. Csillag and Szelényi (2015) interpreted this as a project, which aims to maximize the power of the executive branch of the government (as the only agency which can see beyond individual interest and represent the “common good”) at the expenses of the autonomy of legislature and judiciary.

  12. 12.

    Deaton (2013).

  13. 13.

    Attanasio and Pistaferri (2016). For a Good Collection of Papers on Inequality Beyond Income, see the Special Issue of the Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 30. No. 2. Spring 2016.

  14. 14.

    Many important forms of income, such as fringe benefits of employees, retained profits and taxes paid by corporations, or imputed rent of homeowners, are part of GNP, but are not included in individual survey or tax data (Piketty et al. 2016).

  15. 15.

    Tóth (2014).

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Darvas (2016).

  19. 19.

    See Solow (2015) which bluntly acknowledges this.

  20. 20.

    In Chapter 6 we shall demonstrate this mechanism with a simple arithmetic example.

  21. 21.

    The Mihályi and Szelényi (2017) paper is entirely devoted to the role of rents in the transition process from the pre-1989 socialist to the present day capitalist system.

  22. 22.

    Nevertheless, the Liska-model was not entirely unknown in its own time to the Western public. Norman Macrae (1983), the legendary Deputy Chief Editor of the The Economist magazine wrote a long and enthusiastic paper in his newspaper. For a more recent, English-language write up of the Liska-model, see http://www.liska.hu/fliska/seconomy.htm.

  23. 23.

    The list was compiled from a questionnaire, where people were asked to choose the income distribution diagram with the Gini coefficient closest to the correct one for their country in 2009. On the top, 61% of the Norwegian respondents made the right choice concerning the distribution of post-tax-and-transfer incomes, while in Ukraine only 5 (!) percent of the respondents were right.

References

  • Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, Orazio P., and Luigi Pistaferri. 2016. Consumption Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (2): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestra, Carlotta, and Richard Tonkin. 2018. Inequalities in Household Wealth Across OECD Countries: Evidence from the OECD Wealth Distribution Database. OECD Statistics and Data Directorate Working Paper No. 88, 20 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, Roger D., Arye L. Hillman, and Kai A. Konrad. 2008. 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking, Vols. 1 and 2. Berlin: Spinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csillag, Tamas, and Iván Szelényi. 2015. Drifting from Liberal Democracy. Intersection 1 (1): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvas, Zsolt. 2016. Some Are More Equal Than Others: New Estimates of Global and Regional Inequality. Bruegel Working Papers, Issue 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. 2013. The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuest, Clemens, Florian Neumeier, and Daniel Stöhlker. 2018. Why the IMS and OECD Are Wrong About Inequality and Growth. EconPol Policy Brief 2, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Daniel Treisman. 2015. Misperceiving Inequality. NBER Working Papers No. 21174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Didier. 2015. Extreme Wealth Is Not Merited. Oxfam Discussion Papers, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne O. 1974. The Political Economy of Rent Seeking Society. American Economic Review 64 (3): 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon. 1955. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review 1: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, Norman. 1983. Into Entrepreneurial Socialism. The Economist, March 19, pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1848. Manifesto of the Communist Party. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf.

  • Mihályi, Péter, and Iván Szelényi. 2016a. Two Different Sources of Inequalities: Profits and Rents in Advanced Market Economies. Hungarian Academy of Sciences Discussion Papers, MT-DP—2016/30, August, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihályi, Péter, and Iván Szelényi. 2016b. Wealth and Capital: A Critique of Piketty’s Conceptualisation of Return on Capital. Cambridge Journal of Economics (12). December. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew054.

  • Mihályi, Péter, and Iván Szelényi. 2016c. Az egyenlőtlenségek valódi természetéről [On the True Nature of Inequalities]. Mozgó Világ, 11. sz. 3–12 (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihályi, Péter, and Iván Szelényi. 2016d. Járadékvadászat Nyugaton és Keleten [Rent-Seeking in East and West], 168 óra, No. 31. August 4, pp. 40–41 (in Hungarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihályi, Péter, and Iván Szelényi. 2017. The Role of Rents in the Transition from Socialist Redistributive Economies to Market Capitalism. Comparative Sociology 16: 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. In It Together, Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J., A. Berg, and C.G. Tsangarides. 2014. Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. 2016. Economic Growth in the United States: A Tale of Two Countries. Washington Center for Equitable Growth, December. http://equitablegrowth.org/research-analysis/economic-growth-in-the-united-states-a-tale-of-two-countries/.

  • Posner, Eric A., and E. Glen Weyl. 2018. Radical Markets Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2015. Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert. 2015. The Future of Work, Why Wages Aren’t Keeping Up? Pacific Standard, August 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth, István György. 2014. Revisiting Grand Narratives of Growing Income Inequalities: Lessons from 30 Country Studies. In Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts in Rich Countries: Thirty CountriesExperiences, ed. B. Nolan, W. Salverda, D. Checchi, I. Marx, A. Mcknight, I. Gy. Tóth, and H. G. van de Werfhorst, 11–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. 1967. The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft. Western Economic Journal 5 (3): 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, Martin K. 2010. Myth of the Social Volcano. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2013. End Extreme Poverty and Promote Shared Prosperity. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/WB-goals2013.pdf.

  • Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76 (6): 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Péter Mihályi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mihályi, P., Szelényi, I. (2019). Introduction. In: Rent-Seekers, Profits, Wages and Inequality. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03846-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03846-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03845-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03846-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics