Skip to main content

Indicators of Institutional and Program Ranking of Universities with Reference to the Arab World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance

Abstract

Currently, for a population of circa 400 million in the Arab world, there are 700 public and private universities in the Arab world with an enrollment of 13 million students and 250,000 academic staff (faculty). The 300 private universities accommodate 30% of the student enrollment, compared with 50% in Japan, 30% in Europe 30%, and 20% in the U.S.

Ranking is controversial and biased in favor of research in the natural and medical sciences with less emphasis on engineering and social sciences, and largely ignore the humanities, and favor publications in English.

Academic rankings of world universities vary in the criteria used for excellence. Shanghai Tiao Tong university ranking “Academic Ranking of World Universities” (ARWU), established in 2003, was based on two indicators: published papers in top journals and staff winning high awards.

ARWU ranks 500 top world universities. Institutions are ranked in 52 subjects across natural sciences, engineering, life sciences, medical sciences and social sciences using a minimum standard of publication threshold. It uses four criteria: quality of education (10%), quality of faculty (20%), research output (60%), and per capita academic performance (10%).

Times Higher Education World University Ranking (THE) started with Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) in 2004 and split later with Thomson Reuters in 2009. Along with ARWU and QS world universities rankings, THE are the three most influential international university rankings.

THE uses 13 indicators grouped under five categories: teaching (30%), research (30%), citation-research impact (32.5%), international collaboration (5%), and innovation (2.5%).

The QS ranking uses six indicators: academic reputation (40%), employer reputation (10%), faculty-student ratio (20%), citations per faculty (20%), proportion of international students (5%), and proportion of international faculty (5%).

Jordan Ranking for universities which was developed recently by the Higher Education Commission, is based on giving the university an overall ranking score in respect to five major performance indicators: teaching and learning (score 250), scientific research (score 250), internationalization (score 150), quality of graduates (score 200), and academic accreditation (score 150).

The introduction of university rankings has created competition for global standing, quality graduates, and research outputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Calderson, A. (2016). How to boost your University’s ranking position. World News Issue No. 419 http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2016062113365585

  2. American Council on Education, ACE. (2014). Issue brief: Rankings, institutional behavior and college and university choice. Washington, DC. http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Rankings-Institutional-Behavior-and-College-and-University-Choice.pdf

  3. Buela-Casal, G., Gutierrez-Martinez, O., Bermudez-Sanchez, M. P., & Vadillo-Munoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Economic Forum. (2017). Why are University rankings so important?www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/12

  5. Marmolejo, F. (2015). University governance screening card project. Washington, DC: Center for Mediterranean Integration. World Bank Education for Development. http://www.cmimarseille.org/highereducations/index.php

  6. Wikipedia Ranking. (2017). www.wikipedia.org/wiki/College-and-University-Rankings

  7. World University Rankings. (2018). Times higher education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings

  8. Times Higher Education for Arab Region. (2018). Times higher education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/best-universities/best-universities-arab-world

  9. Who Rules. (2018). QS World University rankings in partnership with Elsevier. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2018

  10. QS Arab Region University Rankings. (2018). https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/arab-region-university-rankings/2018

  11. SIR Methodology. (2017). Scimago institutions Rankings. https://www.scimagoir.com/methodology.php

  12. Angerilli, N. (2013). University rankings: How important are they?www.Forbes.com/sites/evacairns/2013

  13. Huang, M. H. (2011). A Comparison of Three major Academic Rankings for World Universities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y., Bitting, D., Eckelmann, B., Andrews, T., Morse, B., Cheng, Y., & van Vught, F. (2015). Institutional Ranking and Institutional Research. Hawaii: University of Hawaii. http://manoa.hawaii.edu/miro/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/International-rankings-QA-1.pdf

  15. Bendersky, M., Croft, W. B., & Diao, Y. (2011). Quality-biased of web documents. Amherst: Umass. https://people.cs.umass.edu/~yanlei/publications/wsdm11.pdf

  16. HazelKorn, E. (2014). The effect of rankings on student choices and institutional selection. Dublin Institute of Technology. https://arrow.dit.ie/cserbk/

  17. Qs-Maple. (2018). http://qsmaple.org/qsmaple2018/

  18. Academic Ranking of World Universities, ARWU. (2017). Shanghai ranking consultancy.www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2017.html

  19. Academic Ranking of Arab Region Universities, ARWU. (2017). www.shanghairanking.com/ ARWU2017.html

  20. Badran, A. (2017). Indicators of institutional and program ranking of universities in the Arab region. Proceedings of the 15th International conference of the Arab Academy of Sciences, Beirut, Lebanon (November 10–11, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commission for Higher Education Institutions. (2017). Jordanian ranking for universities criteria and procedures. Amman, Jordan. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/eacea-site/files/countryfiches_jordan_2017.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Adnan Badran or Serene Badran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Badran, A., Badran, S. (2019). Indicators of Institutional and Program Ranking of Universities with Reference to the Arab World. In: Badran, A., Baydoun, E., Hillman, J.R. (eds) Major Challenges Facing Higher Education in the Arab World: Quality Assurance and Relevance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03774-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03773-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03774-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics