Abstract
The research aims to generate a workflow, which subdivides the complex problem of optimizing the buildings energy consumption in smaller problems that can easier be solved. The workflow starts from the definition of the insertion context of the building, which influences it principally regarding the climate, the sun exposure and the shadings. The successive step is choosing one or more optimal wall stratigraphies which show the best combination of different parameters, like cost, transmittance, thickness and emergy. The last step concerns the optimization of the shape as a function of the previously defined stratigraphies and of the energy consumptions for lighting, heating, cooling and electrical equipment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aravena A (2007) Alejandro Aravena: progettare e costruire. Milano, Electa
Benis K, Reinhart C, Ferrão P (2017) Building-Integrated Agriculture (BIA) in urban contexts: testing a simulation-based decision support workflow
Cruz T, Boddington A (1999) Architecture of the borderlands. Wiley, London
Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings
Elbeltagi E, Wefki H, Abdrabou S, Dawood M, Ramzy A (2017) Visualized strategy for predicting buildings energy consumption during early design stage using parametric analysis. J Build Eng 13:127–136
Franzese PP (2009) 6—anni di Ecodinamica. In Raccolta di articoli in CD-ROM. Supplemento a Biologi Italiani, A cura di Pier Paolo Franzese. Available online http://www.onb.it/ecodinamica.jsp
Franzese PP, Scopa A, Riccio A, Barone G (2003a) Studio di sistemi complessi: la prospettiva ecodinamica in chimica-fisica ambientale. Biologi Italiani 11:39–45
Franzese PP, Dumontet S, Scopa A (2003b) L’analisi emergetica: una metodica termodinamica per la valutazione della sostenibilità ambientale. In: Biologia Clinica, Ambiente, Sicurezza e Qualità: obiettivi di una professione che evolve. Proceedings of the XVI international conference of the association of Italian biologists, Abano Terme, Italy, Dumontet S, Landi E, Pastoni F
Franzese PP, Riccio A, Scopa A (2003c) Valutazione della sostenibilità ambientale: verso un approccio ecodinamico. Biologi Italiani 7:58–60
Franzese PP, Comar V, Russo GF, Ulgiati S (2005) Analisi dei sistemi ecologici: approccio modellistico-ecodinamico. Biologi Italiani 6:41–48
Gonzalez M, Navarro J (2006) Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials. Build Environ 41:902–909
Keena N, Raugei M, Aly Etman M, Ruan D, Dyson A (2018) Clark’s Crow: a design plugin to support emergy analysis decision making towards sustainable urban ecologies, Ecological Modelling. vol. 367(C), Elsevier, 42–57
Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Negroponte N (1970) Soft architecture machines. The MIT Press, Cambridge
OECD (2003) Environmental sustainable building—challenges and policies Paris, France, p 194
Odum HT (1988) Self organization, transformity and information. Science 242:1132–1139
Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New York, p 370
Pak MH, Smith A, Gill GN (2013) Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 216:948–959
Prezzario Regione Umbria (2017)
Prigogine I (1947) Study of thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. Wiley, New York
Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Pulselli FM, Bastianoni S (2007) Emergy analysis ofbuilding manufacturing, maintenance and use: em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy Build 39(5):620–628
Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Ridolfi R, Bastianoni S (2008) Specific emergy of cement and concrete: an energy-based appraisal of building materials and their transport. Ecol Indic 8(5):647–656
Pulselli RM, Simoncini E, Marchettini N (2009) Energy and emergy basedcost–benefit evaluation of building envelopes relative to geographical location and climate. Build Environ 44(5):920–928
Schaffer JD (1985) Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. Genetic algorithms and their applications: proceedings of the first international conference on genetic algorithms. pp 93–100
Sposito C, Scalisi F (2017) Sustainable architecture: the eco-efficiency earth construction. Eur J Sustain Dev 6:246–254
Thormark C (2006) The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Build Environ 41:1019–1026
von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory. George Braziller, New York, p 295
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seccaroni, M., Pelliccia, G. (2019). Customizable Social Wooden Pavilions: A Workflow for the Energy, Emergy and Perception Optimization in Perugia’s Parks. In: Bianconi, F., Filippucci, M. (eds) Digital Wood Design. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03676-8_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03676-8_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03675-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03676-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)