Skip to main content

Influential Factors of Aligning Spotify Squads in Mission-Critical and Offshore Projects – A Longitudinal Embedded Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2018)

Abstract

Changing the development process of an organization is one of the toughest and riskiest decisions. This is particularly true if the known experiences and practices of the new considered ways of working are relative and subject to contextual assumptions. Spotify engineering culture is deemed as a new agile software development method which increasingly attracts large-scale organizations. The method relies on several small cross-functional self-organized teams (i.e., a squads). The squad autonomy is a key driver in Spotify method, where a squad decides what to do and how to do it. To enable effective squad autonomy, each squad shall be aligned with a mission, strategy, short-term goals and other squads. Since a little known about Spotify method, there is a need to answer the question of: How can organizations work out and maintain the alignment to enable loosely coupled and tightly aligned squads?

In this paper, we identify factors to support the alignment that are actually performed in practice but have never been discussed before in terms of Spotify method. We also present Spotify Tailoring by highlighting the modified and newly introduced processes to the method. Our work is based on a longitudinal embedded case study which was conducted in a real-world large-scale offshore software intensive organization that maintains mission-critical systems. According to the confidentiality agreement by the organization in question, we are not allowed to reveal detailed description of the features of the explored project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bass, J.M.: How product owner teams scale agile methods to large distributed enterprises. Empir. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 1525–1557 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bick, S., Scheerer, A., Spohrer, K.: Inter-team coordination in large agile software development settings: five ways of practicing agile at scale. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016, XP 2016 Workshops, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjørnson, F.O., Vestues, K.: Knowledge sharing and process improvement in large-scale agile development. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016, XP ’16 Workshops, pp. 7:1–7:5. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campanelli, A.S., Parreiras, F.S.: Agile methods tailoring - a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 110, 85–100 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corbin, J., Strauss, A., Strauss, A.L.: Basics of Qualitative Research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dingsøyr, T., Fægri, T.E., Itkonen, J.: What Is large in large-scale? a taxonomy of scale for agile software development. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds.) PROFES 2014. LNCS, vol. 8892, pp. 273–276. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N.B.: Research challenges in large-scale agile software development. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 38(5), 38–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N.B., Fægri, T.E., Seim, E.A.: Exploring software development at the very large-scale: a revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation. Empir. Softw. Engg. 23(1), 490–520 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drury, M., Conboy, K., Power, K.: Obstacles to decision making in agile software development teams. J. Syst. Softw. 85(6), 1239–1254 (2012). Special Issue: Agile Development

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(9), 833–859 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckstein, J.: Sociocracy: an organization model for large-scale agile development. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016, XP 2016 Workshops, pp. 6:1–6:5. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176–189 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glaser, B.: “Naturalist inquiry” and grounded theory. Forum : Qual. Soc. Res. 5(1), 114–133 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glaser, B.G.: Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hildenbrand, T., Rothlauf, F., Geisser, M., Heinzl, A., Kude, T.: Approaches to collaborative software development. In: 2008 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, pp. 523–528, March 2008

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kniberg, H.: Spotify squad framework - part ii, April 2014. https://medium.com/project-management-learnings/spotify-squad-framework-part-ii-c5d4b9398c30

  18. Kniberg, H.: Spotify squad framework - part i, January 2014. https://medium.com/project-management-learnings/spotify-squad-framework-part-i-8f74bcfcd761

  19. Kniberg, H., Ivarsson, A.: Scaling agile spotify with tribes, squads, chapters & guilds, October 2012. https://blog.crisp.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SpotifyScaling.pdf

  20. Kraut, R.E., Streeter, L.A.: Coordination in software development. Commun. ACM 38(3), 69–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Practices for Scaling Lean & Agile Development: Large, Multisite, and Offshore Product Development with Large-Scale Scrum, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Scaling agile development. CrossTalk 9, 8–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leffingwell, D.: SAFe 4.0 Reference Guide: Scaled Agile Framework for Lean Software and Systems Engineering, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Melo, C., Cruzes, D., Kon, F., Conradi, R.: Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55, 412–427 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moe, N.B., Aurum, A., Dybå, T.: Challenges of shared decision-making: a multiple case study of agile software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(8), 853–865 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moe, N.B., Olsson, H.H., Dingsøyr, T.: Trends in large-scale agile development: a summary of the 4th workshop at XP2016. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016, p. 1. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Myers, M., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in is research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17(1), 2–26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nerur, S.: Acceptance of software process innovations the case of extreme programming. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 18(4), 344–354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C., Heikkilä, V.T.: Inter-team coordination in large-scale globally distributed scrum: do scrum-of-scrums really work? In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 235–238, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson, H., Segal, J., Sharp, H.: Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49(6), 540–551 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rolland, K.H., Fitzgerald, B., Dingsoyr, T., Stol, K.J.: Problematizing agile in the large: alternative assumptions for large-scale agile development. In: ICIS 2016 PROCEEDINGS : 37 International Conference on Information Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Runeson, P., Hőst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Int. J. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saeeda, H., Arif, F., Minhas, N.M., Humayun, M.: Agile scalability for large scale projects: lessons learned (report). J. Softw. 10(7), 893 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Scheerer, A., Hildenbrand, T., Kude, T.: Coordination in large-scale agile software development: a multiteam systems perspective. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4780–4788, January 2014

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sutharshan, A., Maj, S.: An evaluation of agile software methodology techniques. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 10(12), 68–71 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdallah Salameh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Salameh, A., Bass, J. (2018). Influential Factors of Aligning Spotify Squads in Mission-Critical and Offshore Projects – A Longitudinal Embedded Case Study. In: Kuhrmann, M., et al. Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11271. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03673-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03673-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03672-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03673-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics