Advertisement

A Descriptive Tomographic Content Analysis Method in Chronic Disease Knowledge Network: An Application to Hypertension

  • Liqin Zhou
  • Lu AnEmail author
  • Zhichao Ba
  • Zhiyuan Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10983)

Abstract

Exploring the hierarchical structure and internal correlation of chronic disease knowledge network is of great significance to distinguish conceptual terms and core directions of chronic disease area. This paper proposed a descriptive Tomographic Content Analysis method to analyze the cross-section of chronic disease knowledge network. K-core values and clustering coefficients were applied to divide the network into layers. Then vectors for each layer were constructed to calculate their cosine similarities to compare their correlation and differences. Finally, network stratification results were compared with the community modules obtained by the traditional social network analysis from a quantitative perspective. To illustrate the method, a number of 26,717 articles related to hypertension in the PubMed database were taken as examples to construct the chronic disease knowledge network. Results show that the chronic disease knowledge network can be divided into the basic layer, the middle layer and the detailed layer. The basic layer can be used to divide the main research directions of chronic diseases. The detailed layer can be used to characterize the specific research and reveal the microscopic forms of the network. The middle layer can be used to explore the network intersection and evolution paths. Compared with the traditional social network analysis method, our proposed method can obtain more in-depth and detailed hierarchical structures and internal correlations of chronic disease knowledge networks.

Keywords

Knowledge network Tomographic content analysis Hierarchical structure Chronic disease Hypertension 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This paper is an outcome of the international cooperation and exchange program “Research on Intelligent Home Care Platform Based on Chronic Disease Knowledge Management” (No. 71661167007) and the major international (regional) joint research project “Research on Knowledge Organization and Service Innovation in the Big Data Environments” (No. 71420107026) supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China.

References

  1. 1.
    NCG: Chronic disease management: the pioneer of online medical care. http://ncd.org.cn/Article/index/id/5641. Accessed 22 Oct 2017
  2. 2.
    Zhang, J.Z., Han, T., Wang, X.M.: Overview of complex network research and its application in library and information science. J. China Soc. Sci. Tech. Inf. 31(9), 907–914 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, X., Ma, F.C., Chen, X.J., et al.: Structure and evolution of knowledge network – concept and research review. China Inf. Sci. 29(6), 801–809 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yi, S., Choi, J.: The organization of scientific knowledge: the structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics 90(3), 1015–1026 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmi, S., Havlin, S., Kirkpatrick, S., et al.: A model of internet topology using k-shell decomposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104(27), 11150–11154 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, C.P., Chen, G.: An exploration of hierarchical domain knowledge network and its micro-morphology based on co-word analysis with reliable relations. J. China Soc. Sci. Tech. Inf. 33(2), 130–139 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clauset, A., Moore, C., Newman, M.E.: Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453(7191), 98–101 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sales-Pardo, M., Guimerà, R., Moreira, A.A., et al.: Extracting the hierarchical organization of complex systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104(39), 15224–15229 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teng, G.Q., Bai, S.C., Han, S.X., et al.: Analysis on the principle of knowledge network at level based on scale-free and fractal theory. Libr. Inf. Serv. 61(14), 132–140 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, K., Kim, S.Y., Kim, E.H., et al.: Comparative evaluation of bibliometric content networks by tomographic content analysis: an application to Parkinson’s disease. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(5), 1295–1307 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blondel, V.D., Jean-Loup, G., Renaud, L., et al.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 208(10), 155–168 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, G.Q., Zhang, G.Q., Yang, Q.F., et al.: Evolution of the internet and its cores. New J. Phys. 10(12), 123027 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alvarez-Hamelin, J.I., Dall’Asta, L., Barrat, A., et al.: K-core decomposition of Internet graphs: hierarchies, self-similarity and measurement biases. Netw. Heterog. Media 3(2), 371–393 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, J.: Overall Network Analysis Handbook: Practical Guide of UCINET Software. Truth & Wisdom Press, Shanghai (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aristotelis, K., Laura, B., Henning, H., et al.: Organizational principles of the Reactome human BioPAX model using graph theory methods. J. Complex Netw. 4(4), 604–615 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cui, L.: Bibliographic Items Co-occurrence Matrix Builder, BICOMB 2.0. http://cid-3adcb3b569c0a509.skydnve.live.com/browse.aspx/BICOMB. Accessed 30 Sept 2017
  17. 17.
    Yang, Y., Wu, M., Cui, L.: Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics 90(2), 659–673 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Studies of Information ResourcesWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations