Advertisement

Self-Defeating Prophecies: When Sociology Really Matters

  • Lorenzo SabettaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Anticipation Science book series (ANTISC, volume 4)

Abstract

Social predictions (as well as social classifications, regulations, and criteria), due to their inner characteristic of being published, may have an influence on their own subject matter and, in return, on themselves. On the basis of this assumption, in the context of a discontinuous debate, the consolidated distinction between self-fulfillingness and self-defeatingness has been developed, distinguishing between predictions that come true thanks to their dissemination and others that, for the same dissemination, become false. The aim of the essay is, primarily, to investigate the rationale underlying this distinction. In an innovative manner, it will be stated that self-fulfillingness always rests on some causal unawareness, because the definition of the situation – originally inadequate – does not take place as a consequence of the subject’s beliefs. In fact, “inadequate” means that it would not come true if it were not for the subject’s behavior, which originates from fear, hope, misconception, and social fatalism, not from an adequate understanding of the situation; in this regard, it is no coincidence that self-fulfilling prophecies always have a commonsense background. Conversely, a self-defeating outcome invariably involves voluntariness and careful deliberation. The prediction fails as a consequence of the renewed intentions of the subjects, who modify some aspects of their behavior in response to the new awareness, preventing the prediction from happening. This new awareness is caused by the prediction itself and is related to its validity: if the subjects would not have been familiar with the prediction, this latter would not have been undermined – in this sense, it is a suicidal prophecy. From this perspective, this essay shows how the self-defeating process, far from being something to avoid, is instead something to aspire to: and this has been so since the original Merton’s definition of the self-fulfilling prophecy, which purpose was precisely to falsify itself, in order to break the vicious cycle of self-fulfillingness.

Keywords

Sociological forecasting Self-defeating prophecy Suicidal prophecy Self-fulfilling prophecy Reflexive mechanisms Social action theory Pierre Bourdieu Robert K. Merton 

References

  1. Agger, B. 2007. Public sociology. From social facts to literary acts. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Azariadis, C. 1981. Self-fulfilling prophecies. Journal of Economic Theory 25: 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudon, R. 1982. The unintended consequences of social action. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1986. Theories of social change: A critical appraisal. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2002. Sociology that really matters. European Sociological Review 18: 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P., ed. 1993. The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1997. Défataliser le monde. Les Inrockuptibles 99 (April): 22–29.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P., and J.C. Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in education. In Society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buck, R. 1963. Reflexive predictions. Philosophy of Science 30 (4): 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burawoy, M. 2005. For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70: 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun, C. 2005. The promise of public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology 56 (3): 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, D.T., and J.C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  14. Campelli, E. 2002. Presentazione. Sociologia e ricerca sociale 68/69: 7–9.Google Scholar
  15. Clawson, D., R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, R. Stokes, D.L. Anderton, and M. Burawoy, eds. 2007. Public sociology. Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century. Berkeley: University Of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. 1993. New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. 1961. Encounters. Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  18. Goldthorpe, J.H. 2007. On sociology – Second edition. Stanford: CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guba, E.G., and Y.S. Lincoln. 1981. Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Hacking, I. 1995. The looping effects of human kinds. In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate, ed. D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A.J. Premack. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2004. Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society 33 (3): 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henshel, R.L. 1982a. The boundary of the self-fulfilling prophecy and the dilemma of social prediction. British Journal of Sociology 33 (4): 511–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1982b. Sociology and Social Forecasting. Annual Review of Sociology 8: 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Horkheimer, M. 1972 Traditional and critical theory, in Id., Critical theory: Selected essays, New York, Continuum: 188–243.Google Scholar
  25. Kemp, M.C. 1962. Economic forecasting when the subject of the forecast is influenced by the forecast. American Economic Review 52 (3): 492–496.Google Scholar
  26. Kopec, M. 2011. A more fulfilling (and frustrating) take on reflexive predictions. Philosophy of Science 78: 1249–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishna, D. 1971. “The self-fulfilling prophecy” and the nature of society. American Sociological Review 36 (6): 1104–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Land, K.C., and S.H. Schneider. 1987. Forecasting in the social and natural sciences: An overview and analysis of isomorphism. Climatic Change 11: 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lombardo, C., and L. Sabetta. 2018. Interpreting life sociologically: The cases of Merton and Bourdieu. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale 115: 37–44.Google Scholar
  30. Merton, R.K. 1936. The Unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1 (VI): 894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 1948. The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review 8 (2): 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1989. Unanticipated consequences and kindred sociological ideas: A personal gloss. In L’opera di R.K. Merton e la sociologia contemporanea, ed. C. Mongardini and S. Tabboni. Genova: Ecig.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R.K., and E.G. Barber. 2004. The travels and adventures of serendipity. A study in historical semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R.K., and A. Wolfe. 1995. The cultural and social incorporation of sociological knowledge. The American Sociologist 26 (3): 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turner, J.H. 2007. Is public sociology such a good idea? In Public sociology: The contemporary debate, ed. L.T. Nichols. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  37. Pisati, M. 2007. Unità della sociologia, unità della scienza. Alcune riflessioni sull’identità disciplinare della sociologia. Sociologica 1: 1–11.Google Scholar
  38. Popper, K.R. 1962. Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. New York/London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Rogers, C. 1996. Self-fulfilling expectations and the general theory. History of Economics Review 25: 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romanos, G.D. 1973. Reflexive predictions. Philosophy of Science 40: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santoro, M. 2007. Per una sociologia professionale e riflessiva (solo così anche pubblica). Sociologica 1: 1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Simon, H. 1954. Bandwagon and underdog effects of election predictions. Public Opinion Quarterly 18: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stack, G.J. 1978. Reflexivity, prediction and paradox. Dialogos 31: 91–101.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, W.I., and F. Znaniecki. 1920. The polish peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group. Boston: Gorham Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thomas, W.I., and D.S. Thomas. 1928. The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  47. Tittle, C.R. 2004. The arrogance of public sociology. Social Forces 82 (4): 1639–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vetterling, M.K. 1976. More on reflexive predictions. Philosophy of Science 43 (2): 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voas, D. 2003. The so-so construction of sociology. The British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wacquant, L. 2013. Bourdieu 1993: A case study in scientific consecration. Sociology 47 (1): 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weinert, F. 2009. Copernicus, Darwin and Freud: Revolutions in the history and philosophy of science. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Wilcock, J.R. 2009. Il reato di scrivere, (ed. by E. Camurri), Milano, Adelphi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Columbia/MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations