Advertisement

Spatial Vector Autoregressions

  • Michael Beenstock
  • Daniel Felsenstein
Chapter
  • 585 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

A spatial vector autoregression (SpVAR) is a panel VAR in which the data happen to be spatial. SpVARs include the temporal lags of spatial lagged dependent variables in their specification. SpVARs generate spatiotemporal impulse responses in which shocks to specific variables in specific locations diffuse over time and across space for the variable concerned as well as other variables. To fix ideas, a “toy” model is used in which there are two locations and only one variable. Subsequently, the numbers of locations and variables are generalized.

An empirical illustration of an SpVAR for Israel is presented in which there are nine regions and four variables. The spatiotemporal impulse responses for the SpVAR are calculated assuming that the innovations are independent and assuming that they are spatially correlated.

We argue that just as structural VAR models under-identify the structural parameters, the same applies to SpVARs. Hence, the epistemological value of SpVARs is doubtful. Nevertheless, SpVARs provide empirical descriptions of the data, which may serve as a benchmark for validating structural models, which are featured in Chap.  7.

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badinger H, Müller WG, Tondl G (2004) Regional convergence in the European Union 1985–1999: a spatial dynamic panel analysis. Reg Stud 38:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BH (2013) Econometric analysis of panel data, 5th edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar-Nathan M, Beenstock M, Haitovsky Y (1998) The market for housing in Israel. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28:21–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beenstock M, Fisher J (1997) The macroeconomic effects of immigration: Israel in the 1990s. Rev World Econ 133:330–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Econometrica 87:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elhorst JP (2014) From spatial cross-section data to spatial panel data. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Fingleton B (1999) Spurious spatial regression: some Monte Carlo results with spatial unit roots and spatial cointegration. J Reg Sci 39:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Hahn J, Kuersteiner G (2002) Asymptotically unbiased inference for a dynamic panel model with fixed effects when both N and T are large. Econometrica 70:1639–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendry DF (1995) Dynamic econometrics. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsiao C (1986) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Im K, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiviet J (1995) On bias, inconsistency and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 68:53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddala GS (2001) Introduction to econometrics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Mundlak Y (1978) On variable coefficients models, Annales de L’insee, France, Apr–SeptGoogle Scholar
  20. Mur J, Trivez FJ (2003) Unit roots and deterministic trends in spatial econometric models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74:967–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rey S, Montouri B (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 58:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu J, de Jong R, Lee L-F (2008) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects with both N and T large. J Econ 146:118–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Beenstock
    • 1
  • Daniel Felsenstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of GeographyHebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations