Advertisement

Technologies to Inspire Education in Science, Engineering and Technology Through Community Engagement in South Africa

  • Patricia Gouws
  • Leila Goosen
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 111)

Abstract

This study purpose was exploring emerging technologies in community engagement, inspiring students’ interest in Science, Engineering and Technology in South Africa. The article introduces the Inspired towards Science, Engineering and Technology project, before reviewing literature related to educators using emerging technologies in community engagement. It shows teaching practices and curricula, and students’ experiences and assessment. The study is located within a theoretical framing, clarifying community engagement issues in an emerging technologies context. Explaining the research methodology for the study attends to the importance of interpretation for qualitative design and considers issues of reliability and validity for quantitative designs. Quantitative results and qualitative responses is discussed, providing insight into participants’ demographics. Results are also connected to literature. The authors make suggestions about the implications of results for universities. Conclusions drawn provide guidance to researchers and practitioners beyond the primary domain, and the authors reflect on results contributing to the research area.

Keywords

Community engagement Computer courses LEGO 

References

  1. 1.
    Dahlberg, T., Barnes, T., Buch, K., Rorrer, A.: The STARS alliance: viable strategies for broadening participation in computing. Trans. Comput. Educ. 11(3), 25 (2011). Article 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breedt, H., Pieterse, V.: Student confidence in using computers: the influence of parental adoption of technology. In: Proceedings of Second Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC 2012), Wrocław, Poland (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millen, D.R., Patterson, J.F.: Stimulating social engagement in a community network. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2002), New York, NY, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giannakos, M.N., Jaccheri, L., Proto, R.: Teaching computer science to young children through creativity: lessons learned from the case of Norway. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC 2013), Heerlen, The Netherlands (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, R.P.: Mostly C+ challenges in LEGO® RCX code generation. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Southeast Regional Conference (ACM-SE 44), New York, NY, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cantoni, L., Marchiori, E., Faré, M., Botturi, L., Bolchini, D.: A systematic methodology to use LEGO bricks in web communication design. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC 2009), New York, NY, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGill, M.M.: Learning to program with personal robots: influences on student motivation. Trans. Comput. Educ. 12(1), 32 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McWhorter, W.I., O’Connor, B.C.: Do LEGO® Mindstorms® motivate students in CS1? In: Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2009), New York, NY, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiesner, B., Brinda, T.: How do robots foster the learning of basic concepts in informatics? In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2009), New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wagner, I., Basile, M., Ehrenstrasser, L., Maquil, V., Terrin, J.-J., Wagner, M.: Supporting community engagement in the city: urban planning in the MR-tent. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T 2009), New York (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buisman, A.L.D., van Eekelen, M.C.J.D.: Gamification in educational software development. In: Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC 2014), Berlin, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karoulis, A.: Evaluating the LEGO-RoboLab interface with experts. Comput. Entertain 4(2), p. Article 6, April 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Dantec, C.: Participation and publics: supporting community engagement. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), New York, NY, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Beer, F.: An asset-based approach to community engagement: Some challenges. Progressio 33(2), 16–29 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor, T., Cheverst, T.: Creating a rural community display with local engagement. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2010), New York, NY, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C., Kavanaugh, A., Viselli, T., Nassar, D.: Panel proposal online community networks, e-government, and community-sourcing actions. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGR 2012), New York, NY, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nam, C., Peterson Bishop, A.: This is the real me: a community informatics researcher joins the barrio arts, culture, and communication academy in a health information campaign. In: Proceedings of the iConference, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koradia, Z., Seth, A.: PhonePeti: exploring the role of an answering machine system in a community radio station in India. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD 2012), New York (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chaytor, L.: Urban empowerment: a successful example of service learning. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum (CITC4 2003), New York, NY, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganoe, C.H., Robinson, H.R., Horning, M.A., Xie, X., Carroll, J.M.: Mobile awareness and participation in community-oriented activities. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research (COM.Geo 2010), New York (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uludag, S., Karakus, M., Turner, S.W.: Implementing IT0/CS0 with scratch, app inventor for android, and lego mindstorms. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Information Technology Education, New York, NY, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goosen, L.: Criteria and Guidelines for the Selection and Implementation of a First Programming Language in High Schools. North West University, Potchefstroom Campus (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Havenga, M., Mentz, E.: The school subject Information Technology: a South African perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations