Abstract
Despite the increasing automation levels in an Industry 4.0 scenario, the tacit knowledge of highly skilled manufacturing workers remains of strategic importance. Retaining this knowledge by formally capturing it is a challenge for industrial organisations. This paper explores research on automatically capturing this knowledge by using methods from activity recognition and process mining on data obtained from sensorised workers and environments. Activity recognition lifts the abstraction level of sensor data to recognizable activities and process mining methods discover models of process executions. We classify the existing work, which largely neglects the possibility of applying process mining, and derive a taxonomy that identifies challenges and research gaps.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
Abdallah, Z.S., Gaber, M.M., Srinivasan, B., Krishnaswamy, S.: Activity recognition with evolving data streams. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(4), 1–36 (2018)
Aehnelt, M., Gutzeit, E., Urban, B.: Using activity recognition for the tracking of assembly processes: challenges and requirements. In: WOAR 2014. Fraunhofer Verlag (2014)
Aggarwal, J., Ryoo, M.: Human activity analysis. ACM Comput. Surv. 43(3), 1–43 (2011)
Al-Naser, M., et al.: Hierarchical model for zero-shot activity recognition using wearable sensors. In: ICAART (2), pp. 478–485. SciTePress (2018)
Augusto, A., et al.: Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2018)
Bader, S., Aehnelt, M.: Tracking assembly processes and providing assistance in smart factories. In: ICAART 2014. SCITEPRESS (2014)
Bader, S., Krüger, F., Kirste, T.: Computational causal behaviour models for assisted manufacturing. In: iWOAR 2015. ACM Press (2015)
Bannach, D., Kunze, K., Lukowicz, P., Amft, O.: Distributed modular toolbox for multi-modal context recognition. In: Grass, W., Sick, B., Waldschmidt, K. (eds.) ARCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3894, pp. 99–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11682127_8
Blanke, U., Schiele, B.: Remember and transfer what you have learned - recognizing composite activities based on activity spotting. In: ISWC 2010. IEEE (2010)
Böttcher, S., Scholl, P.M., Laerhoven, K.V.: Detecting process transitions from wearable sensors. In: iWOAR 2017. ACM Press (2017)
Feldhorst, S., Masoudenijad, M., ten Hompel, M., Fink, G.A.: Motion classification for analyzing the order picking process using mobile sensors - general concepts, case studies and empirical evaluation. In: ICPRAM 2016, pp. 706–713. SCITEPRESS (2016)
Gonella, P., Castellano, M., Riccardi, P., Carbone, R.: Process mining: a database of applications. Technical report, HSPI SpA - Management Consulting (2017)
Goto, H., Miura, J., Sugiyama, J.: Human-robot collaborative assembly by on-line human action recognition based on an FSM task model. In: Human-Robot Interaction 2013 Workshop on Collaborative Manipulation (2013)
Grzeszick, R., Lenk, J.M., Rueda, F.M., Fink, G.A., Feldhorst, S., ten Hompel, M.: Deep neural network based human activity recognition for the order picking process. In: iWOAR 2017. ACM Press (2017)
Janiesch, C., et al.: The Internet-of-Things meets business process management: mutual benefits and challenges (2017). arXiv:1709.03628
Knoch, S., Ponpathirkoottam, S., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Technology-enhanced process elicitation of worker activities in manufacturing. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 308, pp. 273–284. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_20
Lara, O.D., Labrador, M.A.: A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 15(3), 1192–1209 (2013)
Longstaff, B., Reddy, S., Estrin, D.: Improving activity classification for health applications on mobile devices using active and semi-supervised learning. In: ICST 2010. IEEE (2010)
Lukowicz, P., et al.: Recognizing workshop activity using body worn microphones and accelerometers. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) Pervasive 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 18–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24646-6_2
Maekawa, T., Nakai, D., Ohara, K., Namioka, Y.: Toward practical factory activity recognition. In: UbiComp 2016. ACM Press (2016)
Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Balanced multi-perspective checking of process conformance. Computing 98(4), 407–437 (2016)
Mannhardt, F., Petersen, S.A., de Oliveira, M.F.D.: Privacy challenges for process mining in human-centered industrial environments. In: Intelligent Environments (IE). IEEE Xplore (2018, to appear)
Marin-Perianu, M., Lombriser, C., Amft, O., Havinga, P., Tröster, G.: Distributed activity recognition with fuzzy-enabled wireless sensor networks. In: Nikoletseas, S.E., Chlebus, B.S., Johnson, D.B., Krishnamachari, B. (eds.) DCOSS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5067, pp. 296–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69170-9_20
Mörzinger, R., et al.: Tools for semi-automatic monitoring of industrial workflows. In: ARTEMIS 2010. ACM Press (2010)
Mura, M.D., Dini, G., Failli, F.: An integrated environment based on augmented reality and sensing device for manual assembly workstations. Procedia CIRP 41, 340–345 (2016)
Ogris, G., Lukowicz, P., Stiefmeier, T., Tröster, G.: Continuous activity recognition in a maintenance scenario: combining motion sensors and ultrasonic hands tracking. Pattern Anal. Appl. 15(1), 87–111 (2011)
Ogris, G., Stiefmeier, T., Lukowicz, P., Troster, G.: Using a complex multi-modal on-body sensor system for activity spotting. In: IWSC 2008. IEEE (2008)
Ramamurthy, S.R., Roy, N.: Recent trends in machine learning for human activity recognition-a survey. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8(4), e1254 (2018)
Raso, R., et al.: Activity monitoring using wearable sensors in manual production processes - an application of CPS for automated ergonomic assessments. In: MKWI 2018. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (2018)
Repta, D., Moisescu, M.A., Sacala, I.S., Stanescu, A.M., Constantin, N.: Generic architecture for process mining in the context of cyber physical systems. Appl. Mech. Mater. 656, 569–577 (2014)
Roitberg, A., Perzylo, A., Somani, N., Giuliani, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A.: Human activity recognition in the context of industrial human-robot interaction. In: APSIPA 2014. IEEE (2014)
Roitberg, A., Somani, N., Perzylo, A., Rickert, M., Knoll, A.: Multimodal human activity recognition for industrial manufacturing processes in robotic workcells. In: ICMI 2015. ACM Press (2015)
Schlenoff, C., Kootbally, Z., Pietromartire, A., Franaszek, M., Foufou, S.: Intention recognition in manufacturing applications. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 33, 29–41 (2015)
Stiefmeier, T., Lombriser, C., Roggen, D., Junker, H., Ogris, G., Troester, G.: Event-based activity tracking in work environments. In: IFAWC 2006, pp. 1–10 (2006)
Stiefmeier, T., Roggen, D., Ogris, G., Lukowicz, P., Tr, G.: Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(2), 42–50 (2008)
Voulodimos, A., et al.: A threefold dataset for activity and workflow recognition in complex industrial environments. IEEE Multimed. 19(3), 42–52 (2012)
Voulodimos, A.S., Kosmopoulos, D.I., Doulamis, N.D., Varvarigou, T.A.: A top-down event-driven approach for concurrent activity recognition. Multimed. Tools Appl. 69(2), 293–311 (2012)
Wang, J., Chen, Y., Hao, S., Peng, X., Hu, L.: Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: a survey. Pattern Recognit. Lett. (2018, in press)
Ward, J.A., Lukowicz, P., Troster, G., Starner, T.E.: Activity recognition of assembly tasks using body-worn microphones and accelerometers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28(10), 1553–1567 (2006)
Acknowledgments
This research has received funding from the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 723737 (HUMAN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mannhardt, F., Bovo, R., Oliveira, M.F., Julier, S. (2018). A Taxonomy for Combining Activity Recognition and Process Discovery in Industrial Environments. In: Yin, H., Camacho, D., Novais, P., Tallón-Ballesteros, A. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2018. IDEAL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03496-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03495-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03496-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)