Advertisement

Territorial Cohesion: The Economy and Welfare of Cities

  • Jacek ZauchaEmail author
  • Tomasz Komornicki
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The paper examines how cities contribute to three dimensions of territorial cohesion: polycentricity, territorial governance and the socio-economic growth. The focus is on the role of cities and Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) as producers of well-being and prosperity in space. This issue is examined on the basis of the recent economic models. However, the economic approach is filtered through the lenses of the territorial cohesion, i.e. impact of growth on polycentricity, and territorial governance (place-based policy design). The theoretical considerations are illustrated by empirical findings mainly from Poland and Central Europe illustrating interplay between growth, polycentricity and territorial governance. On that basis the authors propose how to better integrate cities and FUAs in pursuing territorial cohesion at regional, national, transborder and EU level. The paper provides some plausible answers how to make use of urban economic growth for reinforcing key aspects of territorial cohesion such as vertical and horizontal co-operation, connectivity, urban–rural interactions and securing access to services of general economic interest.

Keywords

Welfare of cities Territorial cohesion Polycentrism Territorial governance Territorial cooperation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The chapter presents the outcomes of the research by the Institute of Development in Sopot financed by the Polish National Science Centre under a project: ‘Concept of the territorial cohesion in cohesion policy. Implications for Economic Growth’ (no. 2012/05/B/HS4/04212).

References

  1. Arouri M, Youssef AB, Nguyen-Viet C, Soucat A (2014) Effects of urbanization on economic growth and human capital formation in Africa. Program on The Global Demography of Aging at Harvard University Working Paper No. 119. Retrieved from http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/pgda/working.htm. Access 20 May 2018
  2. Baldwin R, Okubo T (2009) Tax reform, delocation, and heterogeneous firms. Scand J Econ 111(4):741–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bański J (2008) Przemiany funkcjonalno-przestrzenne terenów wiejskich. In: Ekspertyzy do Koncepcji Przestrzennego zagospodarowania Kraju 2008–2033. Tom I, Warszawa: Ministry of regional development, pp 393–434 [in Polish]Google Scholar
  4. Bański J, Degorski M, Komornicki T, Śleszyński P (2018) The delimitation of areas of strategic intervention in Poland: a methodological trial and its results. Moravian Geogr Rep 26(2):84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barca F (2009) An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm
  6. Bottazzi L, Peri G (2003) Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data. Eur Econ Rev 47(4):687–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodzicki T (2018) The role of openness in economic growth of regions. The perspectives of economic growth and new economic geography theory and empirics. Working paper of Institute for Development 001/2018 (040)Google Scholar
  8. Brülhart M, Sbergami F (2009) Agglomeration and growth: cross country evidence. J Urban Econ 65(1):48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camagni R (2008) Regional competitiveness: towards a concept of territorial capital. In: Capello R, Camagni R, Chizzolini B, Fratesi U (eds) Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe. European Competiveness and Global Strategies, Springer, Berlin, pp 33–49Google Scholar
  10. Churski P, Hauke J (2012) Polycentric development and growth areas (w:) T. Markowski, M. Turała (red.) Territorial Cohesion Policy in Poland – Issues In Impact Assessment. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN, vol. 33, Warsaw: KPZK PAN, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  11. Cieślik A, Rokicki B (2013) Rola sieci transportowej w rozwoju polskich regionów: zastosowanie modelu potencjału ekonomicznego. Acta Universitatis Niciolai Copernici, Ekonomia XLIV(1):113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciołek D (2017) Oszacowanie produktu krajowego brutto w polskich powiatach [Estimation of gross domestic product in Polish Local Administrative Districts]. Gospodarka Narodowa 3(289):55–87Google Scholar
  13. Ciołek D, Brodzicki T (2015) Territorial capital and polish regional development: a neoclassical approach. Institute for Development Working Papers no. 011/2015Google Scholar
  14. Ciołek D, Brodzicki T (2016) Determinanty produktywności polskich powiatów [Productivity determinants of Polish Local Administrative Districts]. Bank i Kredyt 47(5):463–494Google Scholar
  15. Ciołek D, Brodzicki T (2017a) Spatial dependence structure of total factor productivity in polish local administrative districts. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica 3(329):73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciołek D, Brodzicki T (2017b) Territorial capital and polish regional development: a neoclassical approach. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger”. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 147–168Google Scholar
  17. Colenbrander S (2016) Cities as engines of economic growth: the case for providing basic infrastructure and services in Urban areas. IIED Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  18. Davoudi S, Zaucha J, Brooks E (2016) Evolutionary resilience and complex lagoon systems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 12(4):711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixit A (2009) Governance, institutions and economic activity. Am Econ Rev 99(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doucet P, Böhme K, Zaucha J, (2014) EU territory and policy-making: from words to deeds to promote policy integration. Debate article. European Journal of Spatial DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  21. Du D (2017) The causal relationship between land urbanization quality and economic growth. Qual Quant 51(6):2707–2723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duranton G (2014) The urbanization and development puzzle. In Shahid Y (ed) The Buzz in cities: new economic thinking. Washington D.C., The Growth Dialogue, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  23. EC (2017) My Region, My Europe, Our Future – Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: office for official publications of the european communitiesGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellison G, Glaeser EL, Ker WR (2010) What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. Am Econ Rev 100:1195–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ESPON (2004) Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Luxembourg: ESPON Project 1.1.1. Luxembourg: ESPONGoogle Scholar
  26. ESPON (2013) ESPON TANGO—Territorial Approaches for New Governance. Scientific Report Version 20/12/2013. Luxembourg: ESPON and NordregioGoogle Scholar
  27. Faludi A (2015) Place is no man’s land. Geographia Pol 88(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Faludi A (2016) EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms. Plann Theor Pract 17(2):302–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forslid R, Okubo T (2010) Spatial relocation with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8117Google Scholar
  30. Glaeser EL (2013) A World of Cities: the Causes and Consequences of Urbanization in Poorer Countries, NBER Working Paper 19745Google Scholar
  31. Henderson V (2003) The urbanization process and economic growth. The so-what question. J Econ Growth 8:47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Komornicki T (2013) Assesment of Infrastructure construction, its role in regional development, report. GRINCOH Working Paper 604. Retrieved from http://www.grincoh.eu/media/serie_6_spaces__territories_and_regions/grincoh_wp6.04_komornicki.pdf. Access 10 Aug 2018
  33. Komornicki T (2016) Migration outflow from rural areas in Poland after the year 2004, Landflucht? Gesellschaft in Bewegung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, Heft 2.2016, Bundesinstitut fur Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, pp 151–160Google Scholar
  34. Komornicki T, Ciołek D (2017) Territorial capital in Poland. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 93–146Google Scholar
  35. Komornicki T, Czapiewski K (2016) Regional development in Świętokrzyskie and Podkarpackie Regions. Background analysis for the project, polish lagging regions. Warszawa, World BankGoogle Scholar
  36. Komornicki T, Korcelli P, Siłka P, Śleszyński P, Świątek D (2013) Powiązania funkcjonalne pomiędzy polskimi metropoliami. Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO, Warszawa, p 218Google Scholar
  37. Komornicki T, Rosik P, Śleszyński P, Stępniak M (2014) Raport przygotowany w ramach III etapu projektu: Oszacowanie oczekiwanych rezultatów interwencji za pomocą miar dostępności transportowej dostosowanych do potrzeb dokumentów strategicznych i operacyjnych dotyczących perspektywy finansowej 2014–2020. Ministerstwo Inwestycji i Rozwoju, Warszawa [in Polish]Google Scholar
  38. Komornicki T, Bański J, Degórski M, Śleszyński P (2017) Obszary Wzrostu jako przedmiot strategicznej interwencji państwa. In: Okrasa W (ed) Jakość życia i spójność przestrzenna: Interakcje rozwoju i dobrostanu w kontekście lokalnym. War5szawa: Wydawnictwo naukowe UKSW, pp 157–176Google Scholar
  39. Komornicki T., Rosik P., Stępniak M., Śleszyński P., Goliszek P., Pomianowski W., Kowalczyk K.(2018) Evaluation and monitoring of accessibility changes in Poland using the MAI indicator, IGSO PAS, MED., Warsaw, p 92Google Scholar
  40. Korcelli P, Degórski M, Drzazga D, Komornicki T, Markowski T, Szlachta J, Węcławowicz G, Zaleski J, Zaucha J (2010) Ekspercki projekt koncepcji przestrzennego zagospodarowania kraju do roku 2033 [Expert proposal for the National Spatial Development Concept till the year 2033]. Studia KPZK PAN, 128Google Scholar
  41. Kunzmann KR, Wegener M (1991) The Pattern of Urbanisation in Western Europe 1960–1990. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung 28. Dortmund: Institut für Raumplanung, Universität DortmundGoogle Scholar
  42. Markowski T (2013) Territorial dimension of integrated development policy—expectations and challenges concerning planning and institutional systems. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN 35:51–64Google Scholar
  43. Markowski T (2017) New externalities in development of creative and intelligent city—theoretical concept. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN 51:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Markowski T (2018) Polityka urbanistyczna państwa—koncepcja, zakres i struktura instytucjonalna w systemie zintegrowanego zarządzania rozwojem [State Urban Policy—concept, Institutional scope and structure in integrative management of the development]. Studia KPZK PAN 183:89–101Google Scholar
  45. Marshall A (1879) Economics of industry. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Medeiros E (2014) Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA). The process, methods and techniques. Lisbon, Centro de cEstudios Geográficod da Universidade de Lisboa—Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do TerritórioGoogle Scholar
  48. Medeiros E (2016). Territorial cohesion: an EU concept. Eur J Spat Dev, 60. Retrieved from https://relocal.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2017/01/Refereed_60-1.pdf. Access 17 May 2018
  49. Mikolajczyk A (2015) Pomorskie doświadczenia dialogu terytorialnego jako przykład dobrej praktyki w zakresie realizowania terytorialnie ukierunkowanej polityki rozwoju [Experience of Pomerania Region on territorial dialogue as a good practice related to place-based evelopment policy]. In: Zaucha J, Brodzicki T, Ciołek D, Komornicki T, Mogiła Z, Szlachta J, Zaleski J (2015) Terytorialny wymiar wzrostu i rozwoju. Warszawa, Difin, pp 396–406Google Scholar
  50. Mills E, McDonald J (2017) Sources of metropolitan growth. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Ministry of Regional Development (2011) National spatial development concept. Ministry of Regional Development, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  52. Mogiła Z (2015) Conceptual model of the concept of the territorial cohesion. Working paper of Institute for Development 010/2015 (029)Google Scholar
  53. Mogiła Z (2017) Cohesion as a territorial optimum. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare: lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 73–92Google Scholar
  54. Moreno R, Paci R, Usai S (2005) Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions. Environment and Planning A, 37:1793–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mukhopadhyay P (2018) Engines without drivers: cities in India’s growth story. CPRINDIA Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.cprindia.org/research/papers/engines-without-drivers-cities-india%E2%80%99s-growth-story. Access 21 July 2018
  56. Nijkamp P (2010) Regional development in an unstable word. In. Churski P, Ratajczak W (eds) Regional development and regional policy in Poland: first experiences and new challenges of the European Union membership. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN 27, part 1: 10–18Google Scholar
  57. Nijkamp P (2018) The body and soul of space: a microcosmic perspective. Presentation at the conference spatial development of Poland in the face of civilization challenges of the Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jachranka 5–6 June 2018. Retrieved from http://kpzk.pan.pl/images/prezentacje_kpzk60/Peter-Nijkamp-Conference-Warsaw3.pdf. Access 20 July 2018
  58. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. OECD (1997) Regional competitiveness and skills. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  60. Ottaviano GM (2010) ‘New’new economic geography: firm heterogeneity and agglomeration economies. J Econ Geogr 11(2):231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rodríguez-Pose A (2013) Do institutions matter for regional development? Reg Stud 47(7):1034–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodríguez-Pose A, Ketterer T (2016) Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe. Retrieved from https://az659834.vo.msecnd.net/eventsairwesteuprod/production-ersa-public/1a1b44496f22469194d50076e57fbbe4. Access 21 May 2018
  63. Rosik P, Stępniak M, Komornicki T (2015) The decade of the big push to roads in Poland: impact on improvement in accessibility and territorial cohesion from a policy perspective. Transp Policy 37:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Śleszyński P (2013) Delimitacja Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych stolic województw. Przegląd Geograficzny 85(2):173–197 [in Polish]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Śleszyński P, Bański J, Degórski M, Komornicki T (2017) Delimitacja Obszarów Strategicznej Interwencji Państwa: obszarów wzrostu i obszarów problemowych, 2017, Warszawa, Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, 310 p (Prace Geograficzne, 260)Google Scholar
  66. Śleszyński P, Bierzyński A, Cerić D, Ciechański A, Degórska B, Degórski M, Komornicki T, Korcelli-Olejniczak E, Piotrowski F, Stępniak M, Węcławowicz G, Wiśniewski R (2017b) Analiza sytuacji rozwojowej miast, w tym charakterystyka miast tracących funkcje społeczno-gospodarcze, Raport dla Ministerstwa Rozwoju. Ministerstwo Rozwoju, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  67. Smętkowski M, Jałowiecki B, Gorzelak G (2008) Obszary metropolitalne w Polsce: problemy rozwojowe i delimitacja, Raporty i Analizy EUROREG, 1 [in Polish]Google Scholar
  68. Spiekermann K, Wegener M, Květoň V, Marada M, Schürmann C, Biosca O, Ulied Segui A, Antikainen H, Kotavaara O, Rusanen J, Bielańska D, Fiorello D, Komornicki T, Rosik P, Stepniak M (2013) TRACC transport accessibility at regional/local scale and patterns in Europe. Final Report. ESPON Applied ResearchGoogle Scholar
  69. Staniek Z (2007) Zróżnicowanie ekonomii instytucjonalnej [Differences in institutional economics]. Retrieved from http://www.e-sgh.pl/niezbednik/student_przedmiot.php?pid=1081. Access 29 May 2018
  70. Szlachta J, Zaucha J, Komornicki T (2017) Polish development policy and its territorial dimension. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk, University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 49–71Google Scholar
  71. World Bank (2009) World development report 2009: reshaping economic geography. World Bank, Washington D.CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. World Bank (2015) Competitive cities for jobs and growth. World Bank Group, Washington D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. World Bank (2017) Cities in Europe and Central Asia: Poland. World Bank Group, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  74. Yusuf, S., Leipziger, D. (2014) Making city lights shine brighter. CEPR Policy Insight, 71Google Scholar
  75. Zaucha J (2007) Rola przestrzeni w kształtowaniu relacji gospodarczych—ekonomiczne fundamenty planowania przestrzennego w Europie Bałtyckiej [Territory as a factor determining economic relations—economic foundations for spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region]. Fundacja Rozwoju Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, GdańskGoogle Scholar
  76. Zaucha J (2011) Spatial functional linkages according to the economist. In: Komornicki T, Siłka P (eds) Functional linkages between polish metropolises. Studia Regionalia KPZK PAN 29: 130–147Google Scholar
  77. Zaucha J (2014) Regional institutions and economic growth of regions. Working paper of Institute for Development 002/2013 (013)Google Scholar
  78. Zaucha J, Szlachta J, (2017) Territorial cohesion: origin, content and operationalization. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 23–47Google Scholar
  79. Zaucha J, Świątek D, Stańczuk-Olejnik K (2013) Place-based territorially sensitive and integrated approach. Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Rozwoju, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  80. Zaucha J, Komornicki T, Böhme K, Świątek D, Żuber P (2014) Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. Eur Plan Stud 22(2):246–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zaucha J, Komornicki T, Szlachta J (2017) Territorial cohesion in Polish region al development Policy as a process of adaptation to the specifics of a territorial unit. In: Bradley J, Zaucha J (eds) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk and Institute for Development, pp 205–222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Gdańsk and Institute for DevelopmentGdańsk and SopotPoland
  2. 2.Department of Spatial OrganizationInstitute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations