Skip to main content

Oilfield Abandonment Decision by Applying a Fuzzy Pay-Off Method for Real Options

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applying Fuzzy Logic for the Digital Economy and Society

Abstract

This work presents a model for valuing the abandonment real option of an oilfield. The model uses a fuzzy scenario-based real option valuation method named Center of Gravity Fuzzy Pay-Off Method (CoG-FPOM). This method uses fuzzy numbers as possibility distributions and was recently proposed to overcome an inconsistency detected within the original Fuzzy Pay-Off Method. The model is simple to use and can evidence the value added by this kind of analysis in the digital oilfield context. One example of the application of the model is presented and its results show that taking the abandonment option into account in this case increases the oilfield value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this work we only consider type-1 fuzzy sets, for which the truth value algebra is the set [0,  1].

  2. 2.

    The presented model uses three scenarios and triangular fuzzy numbers, but it can be adapted to four scenarios and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers or whatever scenario strategy the company uses.

  3. 3.

    The most common reasons are technical (life of equipment/facilities) or contractual (end of concession period).

  4. 4.

    The expected pay-off for the following year must always be discounted to the year of the analysis—in our example, the expected pay-off for year 11 must be discounted to year 10.

  5. 5.

    Managers of the petroleum exploration and production industry who have at least 10 years of experience in the planning/management/projection activity.

References

  1. Amram, M., & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bai, Y., & Wang, D. (2006) Fundamentals of fuzzy logic control – Fuzzy sets, fuzzy rules and defuzzifications (pp. 17–36). London: Springer London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel, J. E., & Bratvold, R. B. (2008). From uncertainty quantification to decision making in the oil and gas industry. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 26(5), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borges, R. E. P., Dias, M. A. G., Neto, A. D. D., & Meier, A. (2018). Fuzzy pay-off method for real options: The center of gravity approach with application in oilfield abandonment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 353, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyle, P. P. (1977). Options: A Monte Carlo approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(3), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlsson, C., & Fullér, R. (2001) On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlsson, C., & Fuller, R. (2003). A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 139(2003), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson, C., & Fullér, R. (2011). Possibility for decision: A possibilistic approach to real life decisions. Berlin: Springer Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Collan, M. (2011). Valuation of industrial giga-investments: Theory and practice. Fuzzy Economic Review, XVI(1), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collan, M., Björk, K.-M., & Kyläheiko, K. (2014). Evaluation of an information systems investment into reducing the bullwhip effect – A three-step process. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 17(3), 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collan, M., Fullér, R., & Mezei, J. (2009). A fuzzy pay-off method for real option valuation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 2009, 238196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collan, M., Haahtela, T., & Kyläheiko, K. (2016). On the usability of real option valuation model types under different types of uncertainty. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 11(1), 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Collan, M., & Kinnunen, J. (2011). A procedure for the rapid pre-acquisition screening of target companies using the pay-off method for real option valuation. Journal of Real Options and Strategy, 4(1), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Collan, M., & Kyläheiko, K. (2013). Forward-looking valuation of strategic patent portfolios under structural uncertainty. Journal of Intellectual Properties Rights, 18, 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collan, M., & Luukka, P. (2014). Evaluating R&D projects as investments by using an overall ranking from four new fuzzy similarity measure-based TOPSIS variants. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(3), 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, J., Ross, S., & Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dias, M. A. G. (2004). Valuation of exploration and production assets: An overview of real options models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 44(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dias, M. A. G. (2014). Análise de Investimentos com Opções Reais. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dubois, D. (1997). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1997). The three semantics of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 90(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Favato, G., Cottingham, J. A., & Isachenkova, N. (2015). Blending scenarios into real options: Relevance of the pay-off method to management investment decisions. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(2), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, S. H., & Liao, S. H. (2011). A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15296–15302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jafarizadeh, B., & Bratvold, R. (2012). Two-factor oil-price model and real option valuation: An example of oilfield abandonment. SPE Economics and Management, 4(3), 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuchta, D. (2000). Fuzzy capital budgeting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111(3), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathews, S., Datar, V., & Johnson, B. (2007). A practical method for valuing real options: The Boeing approach. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(2), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Osmundsen, P., & Tveteras, R. (2003). Decommissioning of petroleum installations—Major policy issues. Energy Policy, 31(970911), 1579–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Parente, V., Ferreira, D., Moutinho dos Santos, E., & Luczynski, E. (2006). Offshore decommissioning issues: Deductibility and transferability. Energy Policy, 34(15), 1992–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Robichek, A. A., & Horne, J. C. (1967). Abandonment value and capital budgeting. Journal of Finance, 22(4), 577–589.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taleb, N. N. (2007). Black swans and the domains of statistics. The American Statistician, 61(3), 198–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tourinho, O. A. F. (1979) The valuation of reserves of natural resources—An option pricing approach. PhD thesis. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Infection Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the great technical support received from Mikael Collan, Roberto Teodoro and from the members of the Research Center for Fuzzy Management Methods of the University of Fribourg. Roberto E. P. Borges acknowledges the financial support received from Capes/Brazil through the PDSE scholarship number 88881.131650/2016-01. Marco A. G. Dias acknowledges the financial support from Petrobras/Cenpes through the research project FlexWell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Evelim Penha Borges .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borges, R.E.P., Meier, A., Dias, M.A.G., Neto, A.D.D. (2019). Oilfield Abandonment Decision by Applying a Fuzzy Pay-Off Method for Real Options. In: Meier, A., Portmann, E., Terán, L. (eds) Applying Fuzzy Logic for the Digital Economy and Society. Fuzzy Management Methods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03368-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics