Skip to main content

A Performance Study of High-End Fog and Fog Cluster in iFogSim

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence in Information Systems (CIIS 2018)

Abstract

Fog computing is introduced to help leverage the processing burden in cloud as it can no longer sustain the ever-growing volume, velocity and variety of the IoT-generated data. Existing studies have shown that fog computing is able to reduce the latency and provide other benefits in the IoT-fog-cloud environment. While fog is heterogeneous since can be any device with computing, networking and storage ability, its scalability must be ensured. Currently, not many studies have been conducted to see the performance of fog in different scalability approaches i.e. scaling up and scaling down. This paper provides a brief explanation on iFogSim, which is a Java-based program that allows modelling and simulation of fog computing environments. The iFogSim is used in this study to simulate the fog environment in scaling up and scaling out approaches running in five configuration settings. In the scaling out approach, it presents a cluster of fogs with similar specifications and the scaling up approach presents a high-end fog with greater capabilities than the fogs in the first approach. Our initial findings delineate that the scaling out approach gives a better result in reducing the cost of execution in cloud. In this paper, we provide an insightful discussion on the strength and weakness in these two approaches. This would open up new avenues of further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal, D., El Abbadi, A., Das, S., Elmore, A.J.: Database scalability, elasticity, and autonomy in the cloud. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). LNCS(PART 1), vol. 6587, pp. 2–15 (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Appuswamy, R., Gkantsidis, C., Narayanan, D., Hodson, O., Rowstron, A.: Scale-up vs scale-out for Hadoop, pp. 1–13 (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2523616.2523629

  3. Barroso, L., Dean, J., Holzle, U.: Web search for a planet: the google cluster architecture. IEEE Micro 23(2), 22–28 (2003). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/absall.jsp?arnumber=1196112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S.: Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13–16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cisco: Fog Computing and the Internet of Things: Extend the Cloud to Where the Things Are, pp. 1–6 (2015). http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/trends/iot/docs/computing-overview.pdf

  6. Dastjerdi, A.V., Gupta, H., Calheiros, R.N., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: Fog computing: principles, architectures, and applications. In: Internet of Things: Principles and Paradigms (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, H., Dastjerdi, A.V., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in internet of things, edge and fog computing environments, pp. 1–22 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02007

  8. Hong, K., Lillethun, D.: Mobile fog: a programming model for large-scale applications on the internet of things, pp. 15–20 (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2491270

  9. Lopes, M.M., Capretz, M.A.M., Bittencourt, L.F.: MyiFogSim: a simulator for virtual machine migration in fog computing. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 47–52 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmoud, M.M., Rodrigues, J.J., Saleem, K., Al-Muhtadi, J., Kumar, N., Korotaev, V.: Towards energy-aware fog-enabled cloud of things for healthcare. Comput. Electr. Eng. 67, 58–69 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.02.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmud, R., Buyya, R.: Modelling and simulation of fog and edge computing environments using iFogSim toolkit. In: Fog and Edge Computing: Principles and Paradigms, chap. 17, pp. 1–35. Wiley Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmud, R., Ramamohanarao, K., Buyya, R.: Latency-aware application module management for fog computing environments. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 9(4), 1–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newaz, S.S., Lee, G.M., Uddin, M.R., Mohammed, A.F.Y., Choi, J.K., et al.: Towards realizing the importance of placing fog computing facilities at the central office of a pon. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 152–157 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. OpenFog Consortium: Out of the Fog: Use Case Scenarios, pp. 0–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. OpenFog Consortium: Out of the Fog: Use Case Scenarios, pp. 1–8 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Skala, K., Davidovic, D., Afgan, E., Sojat, Z.: Scalable distributed computing hierarchy: cloud, fog and dew computing. Open J. Cloud Comput. 2(1), 16–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stojmenovic, I., Wen, S.: The fog computing paradigm: scenarios and security issues, vol. 2, pp. 1–8 (2014). https://fedcsis.org/proceedings/2014/drp/503.html

  18. Taneja, M., Davy, A.: Resource aware placement of IoT application modules in Fog-Cloud Computing Paradigm, pp. 1222–1228 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Westbase Technology: Fog Computing vs Cloud Computing: What’s the difference? (2017). http://www.westbaseuk.com/news/fog-computing-vs-cloud-computing-whats-the-difference/

  20. Ye, D., Wu, M., Tang, S., Yu, R.: Scalable fog computing with service offloading in bus networks. In: Proceeding of the 2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud), pp. 247–251 (2016). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=7545926

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatin Hamadah Rahman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahman, F.H., Au, T.W., Shah Newaz, S.H., Haji Suhaili, W.S. (2019). A Performance Study of High-End Fog and Fog Cluster in iFogSim. In: Omar, S., Haji Suhaili, W., Phon-Amnuaisuk, S. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Information Systems. CIIS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 888. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03302-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics